Theresa Bartschmid1, Fedja J Wendisch1,2, Amin Farhadi1, Gilles R Bourret1. 1. Department of Chemistry and Physics of Materials, University of Salzburg, Jakob Haringer Strasse 2A, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria. 2. Nanoinstitut München, Department of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80539 München, Germany.
Abstract
Vertically aligned silicon nanowire (VA-SiNW) arrays can significantly enhance light absorption and reduce light reflection for efficient light trapping. VA-SiNW arrays thus have the potential to improve solar cell design by providing reduced front-face reflection while allowing the fabrication of thin, flexible, and efficient silicon-based solar cells by lowering the required amount of silicon. Because their interaction with light is highly dependent on the array geometry, the ability to control the array morphology, functionality, and dimension offers many opportunities. Herein, after a short discussion about the remarkable optical properties of SiNW arrays, we report on our recent progress in using chemical and electrochemical methods to structure and pattern SiNW arrays in three dimensions, providing substrates with spatially controlled optical properties. Our approach is based on metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE) and three-dimensional electrochemical axial lithography (3DEAL), which are both affordable and large-scale wet-chemical methods that can provide a spatial resolution all the way down to the sub-5 nm range.
Vertically aligned silicon nanowire (VA-SiNW) arrays can significantly enhance light absorption and reduce light reflection for efficient light trapping. VA-SiNW arrays thus have the potential to improve solar cell design by providing reduced front-face reflection while allowing the fabrication of thin, flexible, and efficient silicon-based solar cells by lowering the required amount of silicon. Because their interaction with light is highly dependent on the array geometry, the ability to control the array morphology, functionality, and dimension offers many opportunities. Herein, after a short discussion about the remarkable optical properties of SiNW arrays, we report on our recent progress in using chemical and electrochemical methods to structure and pattern SiNW arrays in three dimensions, providing substrates with spatially controlled optical properties. Our approach is based on metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE) and three-dimensional electrochemical axial lithography (3DEAL), which are both affordable and large-scale wet-chemical methods that can provide a spatial resolution all the way down to the sub-5 nm range.
Vertically
aligned silicon nanowire (VA-SiNW) arrays can significantly
trap light thanks to various enhanced absorption and scattering processes.
As such, they are a promising platform to improve solar cell design
by (i) reducing front-face reflection; (ii) allowing the fabrication
of thin, flexible, and efficient silicon-based solar cells; and (iii)
potentially decreasing fabrication cost by lowering the amount of
silicon required to absorb the incoming solar light. Because the strong
interaction of SiNW arrays with light is highly dependent on the array
geometry,[1−13] the development of synthetic methods to finely tune the array dimension
and morphology is necessary. Additionally, the controlled structuring
and patterning of Si in three dimensions can provide an additional
degree of freedom by providing the opportunity to control light absorption
in three dimensions, which could be beneficial for improved photovoltaic
and photocatalytic systems. After discussing the remarkable optical
properties of SiNW arrays, we report on our recent progress in using
chemical and electrochemical methods to structure and pattern SiNW
arrays in three dimensions, which provide substrates with spatially
controlled optical properties at both the nanoscale and the macroscale.
Optoelectronic Properties of Silicon Nanowires
The
rich interaction of VA-SiNW arrays with light (Figure a,b) gives rise to a variety
of optical effects (Figure c) that include waveguiding,[8−11] Fabry–Pérot resonances,[9,12] low reflectivity (moth-eye effect),[1−7] diffractive effects,[12] and near-field
coupling.[13] Thus, these arrays have highly
tunable light reflection, absorption, and scattering properties, while
providing the opportunity to decouple the light absorption from the
charge separation process, which minimizes charge recombination (Figure d). In the following,
the different interaction mechanisms of light with the SiNW arrays
are briefly explained. For a more detailed description, we direct
the reader to the articles and review papers cited in this section.
Figure 1
Optoelectronic
properties of SiNW arrays. (a) Scheme showing the
geometrical parameters that can be easily adjusted during the synthesis
of SiNW arrays: wire diameter (d), length (l), and array pitch (p). (b) Photographs
of various SiNW arrays synthesized in our laboratories showing colors
that cover the whole visible spectrum, including black silicon surfaces
that significantly trap the incident light. (c, d) Schematic illustration
of (c) various light trapping effects that can lead to enhanced absorption,
reduced reflection, and diffraction; and (d) decoupled light absorption
from the charge separation process that can lead to reduced charge
recombination.
Optoelectronic
properties of SiNW arrays. (a) Scheme showing the
geometrical parameters that can be easily adjusted during the synthesis
of SiNW arrays: wire diameter (d), length (l), and array pitch (p). (b) Photographs
of various SiNW arrays synthesized in our laboratories showing colors
that cover the whole visible spectrum, including black silicon surfaces
that significantly trap the incident light. (c, d) Schematic illustration
of (c) various light trapping effects that can lead to enhanced absorption,
reduced reflection, and diffraction; and (d) decoupled light absorption
from the charge separation process that can lead to reduced charge
recombination.
Leaky Waveguide Modes
Semiconductor
nanowires can act as subwavelength dielectric cylindrical waveguides,
where the light is guided and trapped inside the wire, causing a higher
light absorption at specific wavelengths, responsible for the vivid
colors of SiNW arrays with wire diameters d in the
sub-300 nm range (Figure a–d).[8−11] Characteristic dips are seen in the reflectance spectra of such
VA-SiNW arrays (Figure e). Leu et al. studied the diameter-dependent waveguiding behavior
of SiNWs with diameters ranging from 25 to 300 nm (pitch, p = 700 nm, and length, l = 3800 nm).[10] A contour plot of the simulated absorption,
seen in Figure f,
shows that SiNWs can sustain so-called hybrid HE1n modes
(black dotted lines), where 1 is the azimuthal mode number and n the radial mode number, which represents the radial variation
of the electromagnetic field.[9] All modes
red-shift with increasing diameters, while larger nanowires can sustain
multiple modes: Light absorption can be increased at different wavelengths.
The simulated electric field (E-field) intensity map (Figure g) shows that the HE11 mode is enhancing the E-field not only inside but also periodically
around the nanowires, leading to so-called leaky waveguiding. Additionally,
under normal incidence, the leaky waveguide modes can couple at a
short pitch.[9] This can lead to a red shift
and broadening of the resonance, while the enhanced E-fields generated
around the nanowires can confine the light inside the gap region,
increasing further the E-field enhancement. Such a near-field coupling
has been used to enhance molecular sensing on silicon nanowires.[13]
Figure 2
Guided modes, Fabry–Pérot resonances, and
black silicon
for solar cells. (a–g) Guided modes. (a–d) Top row,
optical microscopy images (scale bars: 100 μm); bottom row,
corresponding secondary electron SEM images tilted images (scale bars:
100 nm) of various SiNW arrays (p = 430 nm, l ∼ 1700 nm). (a) d = 118 nm. (b) d = 87 nm. (c) d = 77 nm. (d) d = 63 nm. (e) Reflectance spectra of the SiNW arrays shown in panels
a–d. Adapted from ref (11). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (f) Contour
plot of simulated absorption as a function of wavelength and nanowire
diameter (p = 800 nm, l = 3800 nm).
Dotted black lines indicate different waveguiding modes. (g) Electric
field intensity maps of leaky mode resonances for d = 120 nm at λ = 670 nm (HE11 mode). The dotted
white line indicates the edge of the nanowire cross-section. (f, g)
Reprinted with permission from ref (10). Copyright 2012 The Optical Society. (h) Reflectance
spectrum of VA-SiNW array showing oscillations characteristic of Fabry–Pérot
resonances (d = 200 nm, l = 2.4
μm). Inset: Corresponding normalized magnitude of the electric
field at the wavelength noted with an asterisk. Modified from ref (12). Copyright 2016 American
Chemical Society. (i–k) Black silicon for solar cells. (i)
SEM image of black silicon prepared via reactive ion etching. (j)
Reflectance spectra of a bare black-Si sample (dashed line), a black-Si
sample coated with 20 nm of Al2O3 (black solid
line), and typical random silicon pyramids coated with 90-nm-thick
Al2O3 film (black dotted line). A dramatic decrease
in reflectance is observed for black silicon, especially below 500
nm. (k) Relative photocurrent, with respect to the photocurrent at
normal incidence, for different light incidence angles for both the
black-Si (circles) and reference (squares) solar cells. The light
incidence angle θ is defined in the inset. Adapted by permission
from ref (14). Copyright
2015 Springer Nature.
Guided modes, Fabry–Pérot resonances, and
black silicon
for solar cells. (a–g) Guided modes. (a–d) Top row,
optical microscopy images (scale bars: 100 μm); bottom row,
corresponding secondary electron SEM images tilted images (scale bars:
100 nm) of various SiNW arrays (p = 430 nm, l ∼ 1700 nm). (a) d = 118 nm. (b) d = 87 nm. (c) d = 77 nm. (d) d = 63 nm. (e) Reflectance spectra of the SiNW arrays shown in panels
a–d. Adapted from ref (11). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (f) Contour
plot of simulated absorption as a function of wavelength and nanowire
diameter (p = 800 nm, l = 3800 nm).
Dotted black lines indicate different waveguiding modes. (g) Electric
field intensity maps of leaky mode resonances for d = 120 nm at λ = 670 nm (HE11 mode). The dotted
white line indicates the edge of the nanowire cross-section. (f, g)
Reprinted with permission from ref (10). Copyright 2012 The Optical Society. (h) Reflectance
spectrum of VA-SiNW array showing oscillations characteristic of Fabry–Pérot
resonances (d = 200 nm, l = 2.4
μm). Inset: Corresponding normalized magnitude of the electric
field at the wavelength noted with an asterisk. Modified from ref (12). Copyright 2016 American
Chemical Society. (i–k) Black silicon for solar cells. (i)
SEM image of black silicon prepared via reactive ion etching. (j)
Reflectance spectra of a bare black-Si sample (dashed line), a black-Si
sample coated with 20 nm of Al2O3 (black solid
line), and typical random silicon pyramids coated with 90-nm-thick
Al2O3 film (black dotted line). A dramatic decrease
in reflectance is observed for black silicon, especially below 500
nm. (k) Relative photocurrent, with respect to the photocurrent at
normal incidence, for different light incidence angles for both the
black-Si (circles) and reference (squares) solar cells. The light
incidence angle θ is defined in the inset. Adapted by permission
from ref (14). Copyright
2015 Springer Nature.
Fabry–Pérot
Resonances
VA-SiNWs irradiated under normal incidence (i.e.,
parallel to the
NW long-axis) can sustain Fabry–Pérot resonances where
the incident light is reflected at the bottom and the top of the nanowire
array to form a standing wave, leading to a characteristic dip in
the reflectance spectrum.[9,12] Such Fabry–Pérot
cavities are observed whenever the round trip nanowire length 2l = mλeff, where m is
an integer, and λeff is the effective wavelength
in the nanowire array, defined by λeff = λ0/neff, where λ0 is the wavelength of light in vacuum and neff is the effective refractive index. Such a condition can
be met at several wavelengths for large nanowire lengths, seen by
oscillations in the reflectance spectrum of such VA-SiNW arrays (Figure h). The Fabry–Pérot
modes can be easily identified by the evenly spaced nodes of the E-field
along the NW long-axis, seen on the E-field maps calculated via numerical
simulations (inset Figure h). Additionally, the position of these resonances depends
on the NW length.[11]
Low Reflectivity
Due to a Refractive Index
Gradient (Moth-Eye Effect, Black Silicon)
Because of the
high silicon’s refractive index, untreated silicon solar cells
reflect a considerable amount of the incoming solar light (i.e., >30%
in the UV to near-IR range). This is because light reflection occurs
and is highest when a sharp and large change in refractive index occurs
between two interfaces. The use of nanostructured surfaces such as
silicon nanowire arrays can gradually change the refractive index,
leading to a significant reduction of the substrate reflectivity thanks
to the so-called moth-eye effect.[2−7] Such black silicon can almost completely suppress light reflection,
affording the preparation of Si substrates with reflectivity values
down to 1–2% across the UV to near-IR range.[1,14−16] This dramatic change of the silicon surface optical
property has already shown potential for increasing the conversion
efficiency of solar cells across a wide range of incidence angles
(Figure i–k).[1,14−16] Thus, black silicon can lower the amount of active
material while significantly reducing light reflection and has potential
for fabricating high-efficiency and low-cost thin film solar conversion
systems.
Diffractive Effects
Periodical arrays
of nanowires can show diffractive effects. Depending on the diffraction
order, wavelength, incidence angle, and array pitch, vivid structural
colors can be observed. For 2D hexagonal lattice photonic crystals,
the first order diffraction occurs for , where λ is the
position-dependent
peak diffracted wavelength and θ the incidence angle.[12]
Decoupled Light Absorption
and Charge Separation
In addition to their superior optical
properties in comparison
to those of bulk silicon, SiNWs benefit from their one-dimensional
geometry which can decouple light absorption from the charge separation
process (Figure d).[17−19] In a photovoltaic or photocatalytic device, the recombination of
the photoexcited charge carriers before their extraction can reduce
conversion efficiencies. For bulk material with a planar surface,
the minority charge carrier diffusion length Ld should be larger than the semiconductor thickness t, which should be large enough to ensure sufficient light
absorption. For a bulk material, this can lead to either strong recombination
if t is too large (i.e., Ld < t) or improper light absorption if t is too small.[7] Within nanowires,
charge separation can occur in the radial direction, orthogonal to
light absorption, which occurs along the wire axis. This contributes
to lower charge recombination within nanowire devices and allows the
use of low-purity semiconductors with small Ld, potentially reducing fabrication costs.[17,20,21]
Previous
Attempts at Structuring and Patterning
SiNWs
Structuring via Selective Etching
A major challenge in the synthesis of SiNW arrays is the independent
control of nanowire shape, dimension, and composition, while maintaining
simple, fast, and large-scale fabrication capabilities. Often, exotic
nanowire structures have a more complex behavior and provide additional
possibilities to tailor and control functional properties. Vapor–liquid–solid
(VLS) syntheses can be modified to obtain precise control over the
nanowire diameter in the axial direction, by locally varying dopant
concentrations (gold impurities or acceptor/donor atoms) along the
lengths of the nanowire, in combination with selective chemical etching
(Figure a,b),[22,23] or by controlling the catalyst droplet size during the VLS growth.[24] By controlling specific reactive ion etching
(RIE) processes, nanowires can be prepared with a periodically modulated
diameter[25] (Figure c) or with a conical shape.[15,16] Finally, metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE) has emerged as a
low-cost, solution-based, and high-throughput technique to structure
single-crystalline and polycrystalline silicon.[26−28]
Figure 3
Structuring SiNWs via
selective etching. (a, b) Modified VLS synthesis
in combination with selective etching. The structures are etched anisotropically
due to incorporated (a) acceptor/donor atoms (adapted from ref (23); copyright 2013 American
Chemical Society) or (b) gold impurities (adapted with permission
from ref (22); copyright
2015 The American Association for the Advancement of Science). (c)
Periodically diameter-modulated SiNW arrays synthesized via a Bosch-type
deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) process by tuning polymer passivation
and silicon etching periods. Adapted with permission from ref (25). Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH
GmbH. (d–f) Metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE) to structure
Si. (d) Schematic of MACE using a metal catalyst film (in yellow)
to etch through the Si (gray) showing the localized oxidation of Si
in contact with the metal film due to the reduction of H2O2 at the metal film. (e) Synthesis of SiNW arrays via
MACE and colloidal lithography. First row: Scheme showing the main
synthesis steps. Left: a PS monolayer (in blue) is deposited on the
surface via self-assembly. Center: Size reduction of the PS spheres
to form a non-close-packed monolayer (not shown), followed by the
deposition of a gold film and subsequent removal of the templating
spheres yields a gold nanohole array. Right: MACE yields well-defined
silicon nanowire arrays. Second row: Photographs of 2 in. Si wafers
during the process. Third row: Corresponding secondary electron SEM
images. (d, e) Adapted from ref (26). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (f)
Zigzag SiNW arrays fabricated via alternating MACE steps with different
etchant compositions featuring different physical properties such
as viscosity and surface tension. Adapted from ref (29). Copyright 2017 American
Chemical Society.
Structuring SiNWs via
selective etching. (a, b) Modified VLS synthesis
in combination with selective etching. The structures are etched anisotropically
due to incorporated (a) acceptor/donor atoms (adapted from ref (23); copyright 2013 American
Chemical Society) or (b) gold impurities (adapted with permission
from ref (22); copyright
2015 The American Association for the Advancement of Science). (c)
Periodically diameter-modulated SiNW arrays synthesized via a Bosch-type
deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) process by tuning polymer passivation
and silicon etching periods. Adapted with permission from ref (25). Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH
GmbH. (d–f) Metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE) to structure
Si. (d) Schematic of MACE using a metal catalyst film (in yellow)
to etch through the Si (gray) showing the localized oxidation of Si
in contact with the metal film due to the reduction of H2O2 at the metal film. (e) Synthesis of SiNW arrays via
MACE and colloidal lithography. First row: Scheme showing the main
synthesis steps. Left: a PS monolayer (in blue) is deposited on the
surface via self-assembly. Center: Size reduction of the PS spheres
to form a non-close-packed monolayer (not shown), followed by the
deposition of a gold film and subsequent removal of the templating
spheres yields a gold nanohole array. Right: MACE yields well-defined
silicon nanowire arrays. Second row: Photographs of 2 in. Si wafers
during the process. Third row: Corresponding secondary electron SEM
images. (d, e) Adapted from ref (26). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (f)
Zigzag SiNW arrays fabricated via alternating MACE steps with different
etchant compositions featuring different physical properties such
as viscosity and surface tension. Adapted from ref (29). Copyright 2017 American
Chemical Society.
Synthesis of SiNW Arrays
via Metal-Assisted Chemical Etching
(MACE) and Colloidal Lithography[26−28]
During MACE,
a Si wafer covered by a nanostructured metal, usually made of a noble
metal such as Au, is immersed in a solution containing hydrofluoric
acid (HF) and an oxidant, typically hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (Figure d).[26] The noble metal catalyzes the reduction
of the oxidant, and holes (h+) are formed (eq ).The holes are conducted through the metal
and injected into the silicon, which oxidizes and dissolves in the
presence of HF, generating hydrogen gas as a byproduct (eq ). HF is used, because it only dissolves
the oxidized silicon.Due to the catalytic behavior
of noble metals
toward the reduction of the oxidant, the redox reaction occurs much
faster at the metal. As a result, the Si underneath the Au is etched
preferentially. The nanostructured metal catalyst stays in intimate
contact with the silicon surface thanks to attractive van der Waals
interactions, leading to a homogeneous and remarkably anisotropic
etching (Figure d).[30] The silicon doping (type and concentration)
affects both the etch rate and porosity due to band-bending that affects
the hole confinement at the Au/Si interface.[28,31] In general, MACE is independent of the crystallographic orientation.Aside from conventional “clean room” patterning methods,
colloidal lithography has appeared as a straightforward benchtop and
large-scale technique to prepare the nanostructured metal film.[32,33] It involves the deposition of a monolayer of spheres that are usually
made from either polystyrene[33] or a SiO2 core and a polymer shell,[34] which
form a hexagonally close-packed (hcp) array on the Si surface. The
sphere monolayer is used as a template with tunable geometry and dimension
for the physical deposition of the noble metal film. After lift-off,
this leads to a metal nanohole array, which is then used for MACE,
during which the noble metal film sinks into the silicon, producing
an array of VA-SiNWs. The length of the nanowires is controlled by
the MACE duration, while their diameter is controlled by the oxygen
plasma duration during the size reduction of the polymeric spheres.
The pitch is determined by the initial diameter of the polymeric spheres
before size reduction. Thus, the combination of colloidal lithography
and MACE provides a benchtop, cost-effective, and versatile way to
synthesize VA-SiNW arrays with tunable geometries (Figure e).[26] MACE also allows the fabrication of exotic zigzag architectures
along the long-axis by adjusting the solution composition and, thus,
viscosity and surface tension (Figure f).[29]Achieving large-scale
homogeneous SiNW arrays, such as the ones
shown in Figure e,
can be challenging because the metal catalyst might show instability
during MACE when the experimental parameters are not set appropriately
to (i) achieve a defect free nanostructured catalyst and (ii) ensure
homogeneous adhesion of the nanostructured catalyst to the Si surface
during MACE.[26] While the colloidal mask
can be fabricated by drop-casting, spin-coating, or self-assembly
on the water–air interface, large-scale monolayers with only
microscopic defects, such as grain boundaries, dislocations, and vacancies,
are only possible using self-assembly on the water–air interface,
ideally by using a Langmuir trough. Additionally, we have recently
reported the critical parameters to optimize the large-scale homogeneity
of the VA-SiNW array by precisely controlling etchant composition,
metal film thickness, adhesion layer thickness, nanowire diameter
and pitch, metal film coverage, Si/Au/etchant interface length, and
crystalline quality of the colloidal template (i.e., grain size and
defects).[26] By adjusting these experimental
conditions to the desired SiNW array architecture, large-scale homogeneous
SiNW arrays can be fabricated with high-throughput and reproducibility.
Low Resolution Patterning
Many techniques
are available to deposit additional materials on silicon nanowire
arrays. Sputtering or thermal evaporation lead to incomplete shells
or particles with more material located at the top of the SiNWs than
on their sidewalls. Chemical approaches, like self-assembly, can be
used to homogeneously decorate the nanowires with gold particles.[13] Conformal metal shells can be produced via chemical
vapor synthesis,[35] electrochemical deposition,[36] organometallic precursor pyrolysis,[37] or wet-chemical synthesis.[38] For the deposition of defined patterns along the nanowire
axis, electron-beam lithography has been the method of choice. However,
it can only be used to pattern nanostructures lying flat on a substrate
and as such cannot be used to pattern three-dimensional nanoscale
systems such as SiNWs arrays.[39,40] The most promising
approach to pattern specific areas of SiNW arrays is electrochemistry.
By masking the bottom of the array with a photoresist layer, conformal
metal shells can be electrodeposited on the top of the wires.[36] However, synthesizing hybrid metal-SiNW arrays
with exact control over the metal composition, dimension, and position
along the wire axis is challenging and can only be achieved by performing
three-dimensional lithography. To date, multiphoton microfabrication
techniques can be used to perform lithography in three dimensions,[41] but those are usually low-throughput, cannot
produce features below 10 nm, and are limited to polymeric substrates.
Structuring and Patterning Silicon Nanowires
in 3D for Spatially Controlled Light Absorption (Our Work)
Our group has become expert in structuring and patterning SiNW
arrays in three dimensions using affordable, large-scale, and solution-based
chemical and electrochemical methods (Figure ).[11,26,33,34,42−44] The SiNW arrays are synthesized using a combination
of colloidal lithography and metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE).
Our benchtop approaches allow synthesizing exotic SiNW morphologies
with elliptical or hexagonal cross-sections, bisegmented nanowires
by combining MACE with KOH etching, substrates with graded optical
properties using a dip-etching technique, and Si nanowires functionalized
with plasmonic or catalytic nanostructures located at well-defined
locations along the nanowires using the three-dimensional electrochemical
lithography (3DEAL). Such control over the nanostructured silicon
geometry provides the opportunity to (i) control light absorption
within specific locations along the nanowires long-axis;[11] (ii) produce substrates with graded morphologies
and, thus, graded optical properties at the macroscale;[11] (iii) concentrate light of desired wavelengths
at specific locations by placing well-defined plasmonic structures
along the nanowires, which provides homogeneous three-dimensional
E-field enhancements;[42] and (iv) define
catalytically active and passive regions on SiNWs for photoelectrochemical
applications.[43]
Figure 4
Summary of our work to
structure and pattern VA-SiNW arrays in
3D via colloidal lithography, MACE, and 3DEAL. Modified from refs (11), (33), and (42) (copyright 2017, 2018,
2020, respectively, American Chemical Society), and adapted from ref (44) (2021, CC BY 3.0).
Summary of our work to
structure and pattern VA-SiNW arrays in
3D via colloidal lithography, MACE, and 3DEAL. Modified from refs (11), (33), and (42) (copyright 2017, 2018,
2020, respectively, American Chemical Society), and adapted from ref (44) (2021, CC BY 3.0).
Controlled Nanowire Cross-Sections via Colloidal
Lithography[33,44]
Conventional colloidal
lithography is constrained by the spherical shape of the template
which leads to the synthesis of SiNWs with a cylindrical morphology
after MACE. Since the optical properties of SiNWs are highly dependent
on their morphology,[11,45] this clearly limits the potential
of the approach. Interestingly, we found that, during a short isotropic
plasma etching, the hcp PS spheres show a reduced etching rate at
the contact points between the spheres, which leads to a hexagonal
sphere template (Figure a–c). We demonstrated that such modified templates can be
used to prepare SiNWs with a well-defined hexagonal morphology after
MACE. By using different etching durations, it is possible to continuously
adjust the wire cross-section from a perfect hexagon to a perfect
circle.[33]
Figure 5
Modified colloidal lithography to control
SiNW cross-section. (a–c)
Hexagonal cross-sections: a short isotropic oxygen plasma etching
step yields a hexagonal sphere template, which, after subsequent metal
deposition and MACE, leads to hexagonal SiNWs. Adapted from ref (33). Copyright 2017 American
Chemical Society. (d–f) Elliptical cross-sections: Deposition
of the metal layer under an oblique angle results in an elliptical
shadowing effect, leading to SiNWs with controllable elliptical morphologies
after MACE. Adapted from ref (44) (2021, CC BY 3.0). Schemes (a, d) and secondary electron
SEM images (b, c, e, f).
Modified colloidal lithography to control
SiNW cross-section. (a–c)
Hexagonal cross-sections: a short isotropic oxygen plasma etching
step yields a hexagonal sphere template, which, after subsequent metal
deposition and MACE, leads to hexagonal SiNWs. Adapted from ref (33). Copyright 2017 American
Chemical Society. (d–f) Elliptical cross-sections: Deposition
of the metal layer under an oblique angle results in an elliptical
shadowing effect, leading to SiNWs with controllable elliptical morphologies
after MACE. Adapted from ref (44) (2021, CC BY 3.0). Schemes (a, d) and secondary electron
SEM images (b, c, e, f).Instead of modifying
the colloidal template morphology, it is also
possible to control the SiNW morphology by using an oblique metal
deposition that yields elliptical holes due to a shadowing effect
(Figure d–f).[44] After MACE, this yields SiNWs that have elliptical
cross-sections, with aspect ratios up to 2.6 controlled by the deposition
angle.
Synthesis of Bisegmented Nanowire Arrays[11]
Our group recently reported the synthesis
of asymmetric bisegmented VA-SiNWs via sequential MACE and KOH etching
steps (Figure a,b).[11] In a first step, VA-SiNWs are prepared via MACE.
Next, the VA-SiNW substrate is immersed into an aqueous KOH solution
that etches Si and reduces the SiNW diameter. The SiNW diameter after
KOH etching can be controlled from a few tens to hundreds of nanometers
by adjusting the etching time and KOH concentration. The Au nanohole
film used for MACE is present at the bottom of the nanowires and is
left untouched during KOH etching. As such, it protects the Si substrate
and effectively directs KOH etching at the nanowires. A subsequent
MACE step yields a bisegmented wire where the bottom half has a diameter
inherited from the colloidal template, while the top half has a dimeter
that depends on the KOH etching conditions. The length of each segment
is controlled by the respective MACE durations. This procedure allows
precise control over the NW diameter along the NW length. Asymmetric
bisegmented VA-SiNW arrays have enhanced and tunable optical properties
as demonstrated by UV–vis reflectance measurements and electromagnetic
simulations using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. Figure c,d compares the
experimental and simulated spectra of bisegmented nanowires (black
curve) with the corresponding single-diameter VA-SiNWs (red and blue
curves). While the single-diameter NWs show only one dip in their
reflectance spectrum, corresponding to one guided mode, the bisegmented
structure shows a significantly broadened reflectance dip. Absorption
maps (Figure e) show
that the smaller diameter top segment absorbs much more in the lower-wavelength
range, while the larger diameter bottom segment is responsible for
absorption at higher wavelengths. Overall, this leads to the observed
broadening of the reflectance dip. While conventional SiNWs increase
the light absorption by ∼270% in the wavelength range 375–825
nm compared to the same volume of bulk silicon, the bisegmented NWs
provide an even higher enhancement of ∼300%. These results
demonstrate the potential of such bisegmented VA-SiNWs to (i) increase
the overall light absorption thanks to a broadening of the range of
wavelengths absorbed, controlled by a precise engineering of the geometrical
parameters, and (ii) spatially control light absorption at different
wavelengths. The reduced reflectance and increased absorption over
a broad range of wavelengths make these structures promising candidates
for photovoltaic applications.[25]
Figure 6
Bisegmented
VA-SiNW arrays. (a) Schematic representation of the
synthesis route using sequential MACE and KOH etching steps. (b) Secondary
electron SEM image of bisegmented VA-SiNWs with top and bottom diameters
of dbi,top = 98 nm and dbi,bottom = 133 nm, respectively. (c) Measured reflectance
spectra of two different VA-SiNWs with a single-diameter of dsingle1 = 87 nm (red curve) and dsingle2 = 118 nm (blue curve). The black curve shows the
measured reflectance of the bisegmented structure shown in panel b.
(d) Simulated reflectance spectra corresponding to the VA-SiNWs shown
in panel c, same color code. (e) Two-dimensional maps of the simulated
relative absorption within one SiNW in the bisegmented VA-SiNW array
simulated at 553 and 638 nm, with similar dimensions to the wires
shown in panel b. Adapted from ref (11). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Bisegmented
VA-SiNW arrays. (a) Schematic representation of the
synthesis route using sequential MACE and KOH etching steps. (b) Secondary
electron SEM image of bisegmented VA-SiNWs with top and bottom diameters
of dbi,top = 98 nm and dbi,bottom = 133 nm, respectively. (c) Measured reflectance
spectra of two different VA-SiNWs with a single-diameter of dsingle1 = 87 nm (red curve) and dsingle2 = 118 nm (blue curve). The black curve shows the
measured reflectance of the bisegmented structure shown in panel b.
(d) Simulated reflectance spectra corresponding to the VA-SiNWs shown
in panel c, same color code. (e) Two-dimensional maps of the simulated
relative absorption within one SiNW in the bisegmented VA-SiNW array
simulated at 553 and 638 nm, with similar dimensions to the wires
shown in panel b. Adapted from ref (11). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Graded Arrays via Dip-Etching[11]
In addition to controlling light absorption
at
the nanoscale, our group developed a simple dip-etching method to
synthesize arrays exhibiting a shape and diameter gradient at the
centimeter-scale, yielding substrates with graded optical properties
(Figure ).[11]Figure a shows the dip-etching principle. After the production of
VA-SiNWs with a desired diameter, length, and pitch via MACE, the
substrates are immersed in a two-phase mixture composed of an aqueous
KOH solution at the bottom and an organic n-hexane
phase at the top. Progressive removal of the substrate from the KOH
solution leads to a substrate with gradual changes in the KOH etching
duration. The organic phase is used to reduce the residual KOH adhering
to the VA-SiNW substrate and obtain a more homogeneous etching.
Figure 7
Dip-etching. (a) Schematic overview of
the dip-etching process:
VA-SiNWs produced via MACE are incubated in a two-phase system of
aqueous KOH solution and an organic n-hexane phase
floating on top of the KOH. Slow removal from the solution leads to
varying etching times across the substrate. The Au nanohole film is
dissolved in KI/I2 solution leading to substrates with
gradually changing VA-SiNW dimensions and shapes. (b) Photograph of
a gradient VA-SiNW sample (shortest KOH exposure on the left side).
(c) Scheme of the gradient morphology and (d) secondary electron SEM
images (scale bars: 200 nm) of selected positions indicated by the
numbers 1–6. (e) Measured (left) and simulated (right) reflectance
spectra for different positions on the gradient VA-SiNW structure,
same positions as indicated in panel c. Adapted from ref (11). Copyright 2020 American
Chemical Society.
Dip-etching. (a) Schematic overview of
the dip-etching process:
VA-SiNWs produced via MACE are incubated in a two-phase system of
aqueous KOH solution and an organic n-hexane phase
floating on top of the KOH. Slow removal from the solution leads to
varying etching times across the substrate. The Au nanohole film is
dissolved in KI/I2 solution leading to substrates with
gradually changing VA-SiNW dimensions and shapes. (b) Photograph of
a gradient VA-SiNW sample (shortest KOH exposure on the left side).
(c) Scheme of the gradient morphology and (d) secondary electron SEM
images (scale bars: 200 nm) of selected positions indicated by the
numbers 1–6. (e) Measured (left) and simulated (right) reflectance
spectra for different positions on the gradient VA-SiNW structure,
same positions as indicated in panel c. Adapted from ref (11). Copyright 2020 American
Chemical Society.SEM analysis demonstrates
a gradual change in shape and dimensions
of the SiNWs across the substrate (Figure b−d). Regions exposed for a short
time to the KOH solution are composed of cylindrical SiNWs. The SiNW
diameter gradually decreases across the substrate, while at some point
the SiNWs become conical. Finally, for the longest etching times in
KOH, the nanowires convert into short nanocones. The gradual change
in the optical properties of these substrates is obvious by the nice
progressive change in color from blue to orange to gray, seen in Figure b. This is also evidenced
by the progressive changes seen in both the measured and simulated
UV–vis reflectance spectra (Figure e). This approach can be used to study the
influence of SiNW shape and dimensions on specific properties or functions
using only one substrate.
Plasmonic materials have a strong and tunable interaction
with light, which has been investigated by different scientific communities.[46−53] From a photovoltaic point of view, plasmonic nanostructures can
increase light absorption in the semiconductor by enhancing the local
electric field at the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and
via the direct injection of hot charge carriers generated in the plasmonic
nanostructure into the semiconductor.[48,50,54] The integration of metal nanostructures within SiNW
arrays could thus be used to precisely define plasmonic hot spots
in three dimensions within the array.[37,55,56] In this regard, control over the metal nanoparticle
geometrical parameters is crucial to engineer the LSPR for specific
applications, as the LSPR depends on the metal, the nanoparticle size
and shape, and the relative position of the nanoparticles to each
other. However, the fabrication of hybrid single-crystalline Si (c-Si)
nanowire architectures with defined metal nanostructures is a challenging
task.We recently developed a benchtop method, termed three-dimensional
electrochemical axial lithography (3DEAL), which allows the patterning
of vertically aligned crystalline silicon micro- and nanowire arrays
with tailored metal architectures (Figure ).[42] The method
is adapted from coaxial lithography (COAL), a powerful method for
synthesizing metal shells around semiconductor nanowires grown from
solution[57−59] and, as such, not compatible with c-Si. Both COAL
and 3DEAL are based on the sequential electrodeposition of sacrificial
and target shells, which, in combination with selective etching, yields
well-defined metal rings around nanowires. However, 3DEAL can be used
to modify large-scale pre-existing nanostructures, such as c-SiNW
arrays. In short, 3DEAL is made possible by the synthesis of a porous
template with tunable dimensions that guides the electrodeposition
of conformal metallic shells, which grow from the MACE base gold layer
present at the bottom of the wires (Figure a). In the simplest case, a NiAu multisegmented
shell is grown, which, after the selective etching of the Ni shells,
yields isolated Au nanorings with well-defined height and position
along the NW length, both determined by the charge used during the
electrodeposition of the Au and Ni shells, respectively. 3DEAL is
highly versatile and can be used to synthesize a variety of metal
ring architectures composed of different metals (Au, Ag, Fe, and Ni)
with controlled height, thickness, and position along either straight
or kinked wire arrays (Figure b). Positive (nanorings) and negative (gaps) features are
electrochemically controlled, and as such can be adjusted down to
40 and 5 nm, respectively, with relative size distributions in the
10–20% range, which are on par with state-of-the-art electrochemical
templated syntheses of multisegmented nanowires.[60−62] Additionally,
the thickness of the metal shells is chemically controlled and can
be adjusted in the 30–150 nm range. The technique is compatible
with a wide range of array geometries: To date, we have successfully
patterned VA-SiNW arrays with wire diameters and array pitches ranging
from 150 nm to 1 μm and 500 nm to 1.5 μm, respectively.
Figure 8
Three-dimensional
electrochemical axial lithography (3DEAL) to
decorate VA-SiNW with plasmonic materials. (a) Scheme showing the
successive synthesis steps. After MACE, the SiNWs (in gray) are coated
with a SiO2 shell (in blue) and are embedded within a polymer
film (orange). The dissolution of the SiO2 shell generates
annular pores. The pores guide the electrodeposition of multisegmented
shells around the SiNWs starting from the gold film at the bottom
(here: nickel shown in black and gold in yellow). Dissolution of the
polymeric membrane and selective etching of the sacrificial shell
(here: nickel) leads to a well-defined metal shell (here: a gold ring).
(b) VA-SiNWs decorated with a Ag ring dimer. Left: Dark-field STEM
image and corresponding EDX image (green, Ag; red, Si). Right: Low
magnification of a cross-sectional secondary electron SEM image of
the corresponding VA-SiNW array showing the high homogeneity of the
technique. (c–h) VA-SiNW arrays patterned with Au rings. (c)
Typical raw Raman spectra after 1,4-benzenedithiol functionalization
of SiNWs (black curve), native SiNWs with a gold film at the bottom
(magenta curve), a single Au ring array (blue curve), and a 30 nm
gap ring dimer array (red curve). The spectra are offset for clarity.
(d–h) E-field maps. (d, e) The SiNW region close to the Au
rings is shown. (f–h) The whole nanowire is shown. (d, h) Two
Au rings around a SiNW. (e, g) One Au ring around a SiNW. (f) Bare
SiNW. Adapted from ref (42). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Three-dimensional
electrochemical axial lithography (3DEAL) to
decorate VA-SiNW with plasmonic materials. (a) Scheme showing the
successive synthesis steps. After MACE, the SiNWs (in gray) are coated
with a SiO2 shell (in blue) and are embedded within a polymer
film (orange). The dissolution of the SiO2 shell generates
annular pores. The pores guide the electrodeposition of multisegmented
shells around the SiNWs starting from the gold film at the bottom
(here: nickel shown in black and gold in yellow). Dissolution of the
polymeric membrane and selective etching of the sacrificial shell
(here: nickel) leads to a well-defined metal shell (here: a gold ring).
(b) VA-SiNWs decorated with a Ag ring dimer. Left: Dark-field STEM
image and corresponding EDX image (green, Ag; red, Si). Right: Low
magnification of a cross-sectional secondary electron SEM image of
the corresponding VA-SiNW array showing the high homogeneity of the
technique. (c–h) VA-SiNW arrays patterned with Au rings. (c)
Typical raw Raman spectra after 1,4-benzenedithiol functionalization
of SiNWs (black curve), native SiNWs with a gold film at the bottom
(magenta curve), a single Au ring array (blue curve), and a 30 nm
gap ring dimer array (red curve). The spectra are offset for clarity.
(d–h) E-field maps. (d, e) The SiNW region close to the Au
rings is shown. (f–h) The whole nanowire is shown. (d, h) Two
Au rings around a SiNW. (e, g) One Au ring around a SiNW. (f) Bare
SiNW. Adapted from ref (42). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.3DEAL is well-suited to synthesize optically active metal nanostructures
within VA-SiNW arrays that provide large E-field enhancements, as
verified via Raman spectroscopy and FDTD simulations (Figure c–e). Indeed, functionalized
SiNW arrays patterned with gold rings showed a large Raman signal
compared to the reference bare SiNW arrays. Additionally, arrays with
a Au ring dimer (30 nm gap) showed a higher Raman signal than the
array with only one Au ring, which confirmed the E-field enhancement
values expected from our FDTD simulations. Furthermore, Raman map
analysis over 900 different points showed that the Raman signal and
thus the E-field enhancement was highly homogeneous, with a relative
standard deviation of 13%.The FDTD simulations also indicate
that the Au rings concentrate
the light within specific regions of the SiNWs (Figure f–h): The E-field intensity in the
Si located above the rings (top 1.5 μm of the SiNW) is enhanced
by a factor of ∼2 for a single Au ring (Figure g) and ∼3 for a Au ring dimer (Figure h) compared to a
pristine Si nanowire (Figure f), while it is nearly suppressed below the rings (bottom
1.5 μm of the SiNW). These results together with the remarkably
small standard deviation obtained from Raman measurements demonstrate
the reliability and potential of the method to engineer plasmonic
fields and to spatially control light absorption within SiNW arrays.Furthermore, the enhanced optical properties of
silicon–metal
hybrids have rendered them great platforms for photoelectrochemical
studies.[17,19,37,63] In this context, the ability to control the precise
location of catalytic metals on the nanostructured silicon provides
the possibility to optimize catalyst loading, improve conversion efficiencies,
and lower fabrication costs.[43,64] Indeed, the local catalyst
activity can be affected by inhomogeneous mass-transport, charge recombination,
light absorption, catalyst coverage, and defect distribution,[21,65,66] which can be mitigated by optimizing
the catalyst location at the semiconductor surface.[64,67] Nanostructured silicon is a favorable photocathode for solar water
splitting, thanks to the high abundance of Si, highly defined and
tunable electronic properties, appropriate band gap for solar light
absorption, and proper band-edge energy for the hydrogen evolution
reaction (HER).[17] Because of the slow reduction
kinetics of protons, decorating silicon photoelectrodes with catalysts
is necessary to achieve high conversion efficiencies. However, the
catalyst position within the SiNW arrays can play a decisive role
for the conversion efficiencies, as discussed above. The possibility
to precisely engineer hybrid metal-SiNW architectures could help to
further understand the influence of catalyst location and loading
on parasitic light absorption in the metal catalysts, local light
absorption in the semiconductor, relative values of the minority charge
carrier-diffusion length, and local mass-transport to the catalyst.To provide the community with a synthetic platform affording such
complex studies, we modified the original 3DEAL to pattern SiNW arrays
with insulating SiO2 shells, which direct the electrochemical
deposition directly at the exposed regions on the SiNW surface (Figure ). Because the high
surface area of nanostructured photoelectrodes can lead to an increased
recombination rate and decreased open-circuit potential, the ability
to passivate specific regions of the SiNWs should lead to higher efficiencies.[17,19−21]
Figure 9
3DEAL for the spatioselective deposition of catalytic
materials.
(a) Scheme showing the final structure. (b–h) SiNWs patterned
with SiO2 and a Ni–Mo catalyst. (b) Secondary electron
STEM image. (c) STEM elemental map (red, Si; blue, O; green, Ni).
(d) High-magnification secondary electron STEM image. (e) Secondary
electron SEM image. Tilt angle: 30°. Image width: 30 μm.
(f) Photograph of a typical photocathode. Top: Back side. Bottom:
Front side. (g, h) Linear sweep voltammograms for the hydrogen evolution
reaction in 0.1 M H2SO4, pH = 1. Light source:
Calibrated solar simulator with an AM1.5G filter to a light irradiance
of P = 120 mW/cm2. The potentials are
all given versus the reversible hydrogen electrode potential (RHE).
The vertical gray dotted lines are guide to the eyes to show the 0
V vs RHE potential. (g) Blue curve: Bare SiNW arrays. Red curve: SiNW
array patterned with Ni–Mo catalysts. Black curve: Dark current.
(h) Chopped illumination. Adapted from ref (43). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
3DEAL for the spatioselective deposition of catalytic
materials.
(a) Scheme showing the final structure. (b–h) SiNWs patterned
with SiO2 and a Ni–Mo catalyst. (b) Secondary electron
STEM image. (c) STEM elemental map (red, Si; blue, O; green, Ni).
(d) High-magnification secondary electron STEM image. (e) Secondary
electron SEM image. Tilt angle: 30°. Image width: 30 μm.
(f) Photograph of a typical photocathode. Top: Back side. Bottom:
Front side. (g, h) Linear sweep voltammograms for the hydrogen evolution
reaction in 0.1 M H2SO4, pH = 1. Light source:
Calibrated solar simulator with an AM1.5G filter to a light irradiance
of P = 120 mW/cm2. The potentials are
all given versus the reversible hydrogen electrode potential (RHE).
The vertical gray dotted lines are guide to the eyes to show the 0
V vs RHE potential. (g) Blue curve: Bare SiNW arrays. Red curve: SiNW
array patterned with Ni–Mo catalysts. Black curve: Dark current.
(h) Chopped illumination. Adapted from ref (43). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.We prepared VA-SiNW photocathodes patterned with
insulating SiO2 shells and a Ni–Mo alloy catalyst
(Figure a–f)
and tested them
for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Linear sweep voltammetry
in 0.1 M H2SO4 (pH = 1) under light irradiation
(300 W Xe lamp equipped with an AM1.5G filter calibrated to 120 mW/cm2) demonstrates the viability to pattern SiNW arrays with functional
metal electrocatalysts (Figure g,h). The onset potential, at which the current reaches 1
mA/cm2, increases from −0.17 V (vs reversible hydrogen
electrode, RHE) for the bare wires (Figure g, blue curve) to +0.11 V (vs RHE) for the
SiNW array partially coated with Ni–Mo catalysts (red curve).
This demonstrates the potential of the technique to investigate the
influence of catalyst location on the conversion efficiencies of nanostructured
photoelectrodes.
Conclusions
Thanks
to their fascinating and tunable optical properties, VA-SiNW
arrays provide exciting opportunities for photovoltaics, photodetection,
photoelectrochemistry, and sensing. The methods described here can
be used to perform three-dimensional, high-resolution structuring
and patterning of VA-SiNW arrays, which provide additional degrees
of freedom to manipulate light at both the nanoscale and the macroscale.
The 3DEAL is a powerful technique for decorating VA-SiNW arrays with
optically and catalytically active nanomaterials and, as such, should
be relevant to a variety of research areas. In particular, 3DEAL has
the potential to tackle important challenges in photoelectrochemical
devices, such as optimization of catalyst loading, investigation of
charge separation and transfer within nanostructured photoelectrodes,
and further improvement of metal/semiconductor photoelectrode conversion
efficiencies. Because our synthetic approach involves simple benchtop
and chemical techniques that are available to most researchers, it
should benefit most groups interested in and working on nanostructured
silicon substrates.
Authors: Neil P Dasgupta; Jianwei Sun; Chong Liu; Sarah Brittman; Sean C Andrews; Jongwoo Lim; Hanwei Gao; Ruoxue Yan; Peidong Yang Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Sun-Kyung Kim; Robert W Day; James F Cahoon; Thomas J Kempa; Kyung-Deok Song; Hong-Gyu Park; Charles M Lieber Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Jo Sing Julia Tang; Romina Sigrid Bader; Eric S A Goerlitzer; Jan Fedja Wendisch; Gilles Remi Bourret; Marcel Rey; Nicolas Vogel Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2018-09-27
Authors: Theresa Bartschmid; Amin Farhadi; Maurizio E Musso; Eric Sidney Aaron Goerlitzer; Nicolas Vogel; Gilles R Bourret Journal: ACS Appl Nano Mater Date: 2022-08-15