| Literature DB >> 35646290 |
Federico Greco1, Bruno Beomonte Zobel2, Carlo Augusto Mallio2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is the loss of skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and is a sign of cancer cachexia. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may show cachexia. AIM: To evaluate the amount of SMM in male clear cell RCC (ccRCC) patients with and without collateral vessels.Entities:
Keywords: Body composition; Cancer cachexia; Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; Collateral vessels; Kidney cancer; Sarcopenia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35646290 PMCID: PMC9124980 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i4.82
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Radiol ISSN: 1949-8470
Figure 1Axial computed tomography image shows the presence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma collateral vessels with the typical tortuous course located in the retroperitoneal space (arrow).
Total abdominal muscle area and total abdominal muscle area corrected for age in the two groups
|
|
|
|
| ccRCCa group (mean, range, and SD) | 164.02 (91, 233.5 ± 31.86) | 3.08 (1.29, 5.83 ± 1.06) |
| ccRCCp group (mean, range, and standard deviation) | 150.91 (76.3, 218.3 ± 30.34) | 2.67 (1, 4.67 ± 0.91) |
|
| 0.02 | 0.02 |
TAMA: Total abdominal muscle area; TAMA_C: Total abdominal muscle area corrected for age; ccRCC: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Figure 2Bar chart with error bars showing a significant difference in mean values of total abdominal muscle area between the two groups. ccRCC: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Figure 3Axial computed tomography images with maximum intensity projection reconstruction of an 84-year-old male clear cell renal cell carcinoma patient without collateral vessels and an 82-year-old male clear cell renal cell carcinoma patient with collateral vessels. These images show skeletal muscle masses (SMMs) and tumors in a clear cell renal cell carcinoma patient without collateral vessels (ccRCCa) (A) and a clear cell renal cell carcinoma patient with collateral vessels (ccRCCp) (B) (orange and dark orange arrows in A and B, respectively), as well as collateral vessels adjacent to the tumor in the ccRCCp patient (light blue arrows in B) and nodal metastasis infiltrating the ureter (yellow arrows in B). Please note the decrease of SMM clearly evident in the ccRCCp patient (B) compared to the ccRCCa patient (A).
Total abdominal muscle area of clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients with low Fuhrman grade (I/II) and high Fuhrman grade (III/IV)
|
|
|
| ccRCC patients with low fuhrman grade (I/II) (mean, range, and standard deviation) | 158.27 (83.2-233.5), 35.41 |
| ccRCC patients with high Fuhrman grade (III/IV) (mean, range, and standard deviation) | 155.71 (76.3-219.2), 29.44 |
|
| 0.66 |
TAMA: Total abdominal muscle area; ccRCC: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Total abdominal muscle area of alive and dead clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients
|
|
|
| Alive ccRCC patients | 162.02 |
| (mean, range, and standard deviation) | 91, 233.5 ± 28.42 |
| Dead ccRCC patients | 150.91 |
| (mean, range, and standard deviation) | 76.3, 219.2 ± 34.84 |
|
| 0.0008 |
TAMA: Total abdominal muscle area; ccRCC: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier curves showing no statistically significant difference of survival between the two groups (ccRCCa group is depicted as blue curve and ccRCCb group is depicted as red curve).