Literature DB >> 17540307

TNM staging system for renal-cell carcinoma: current status and future perspectives.

Vincenzo Ficarra1, Antonio Galfano, Mariangela Mancini, Guido Martignoni, Walter Artibani.   

Abstract

The Tumour, Nodes, and Metastasis (TNM) staging system is a method of stratifying patients with cancer and is based on data obtained from large multicentre studies that involved large numbers of patients, and have a good level of evidence. However, despite continual revisions to the methodology to incorporate evidence from new clinical studies, the optimum stratification of patients with renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) using the TNM staging system remains controversial and further revisions, in our opinion, are needed. Revision of the TNM staging system for renal-cell cancer could also result in the simultaneous update of the integrated prognostic systems that are currently used along side this traditional method of staging. These integrated systems could become key instruments for guiding patient counselling, for appropriate follow up strategies, for patient selection for clinical trials, and for appropriate assessment of results if the perception that they are complex is overcome. This perception is driven by the presence of more than one system, the heterogeneity of clinical and pathological variables included in the methodology, and the need for robust comparative studies between the various systems. Therefore, in everyday clinical practice, the TNM system is regarded as a more reliable method of staging. In this Essay, we aim to highlight the problems associated with the current version of the TNM staging system and highlight areas in which this grading instrument can be improved in future to become a more refined and standardised method of communication between all clinicians involved in clinical management of RCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17540307     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70173-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  34 in total

1.  Kidney cancer: The prognostic value of urinary collecting system invasion.

Authors:  Alison M Lake; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Recent developments in kidney cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Transcript signature predicts tissue NK cell content and defines renal cell carcinoma subgroups independent of TNM staging.

Authors:  Judith Eckl; Alexander Buchner; Petra U Prinz; Rainer Riesenberg; Sabine I Siegert; Robert Kammerer; Peter J Nelson; Elfriede Noessner
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Human renal cell carcinoma induces a dendritic cell subset that uses T-cell crosstalk for tumor-permissive milieu alterations.

Authors:  Ainhoa-M Figel; Dorothee Brech; Petra U Prinz; Ulrike K Lettenmeyer; Judith Eckl; Adriana Turqueti-Neves; Josef Mysliwietz; David Anz; Nicole Rieth; Niklas Muenchmeier; Alexander Buchner; Stefan Porubsky; Sabine I Siegert; Stephan Segerer; Peter J Nelson; Elfriede Noessner
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Renal cell carcinoma: where will the state-of-the-art lead us?

Authors:  A Rose Brannon; W Kimryn Rathmell
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Loss of BAP1 protein expression is an independent marker of poor prognosis in patients with low-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Richard W Joseph; Payal Kapur; Daniel J Serie; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Mansi Parasramka; Thai Ho; John C Cheville; Eugene Frenkel; Dinesh Rakheja; James Brugarolas; Alexander Parker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  High peritumoral Bmi-1 expression is an independent prognosticator of poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Qilai Long; Li Liu; Yu Xia; Qi Bai; Jiajun Wang; Jiejie Xu; Jianming Guo
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-05-14

8.  Development and evaluation of BioScore: a biomarker panel to enhance prognostic algorithms for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexander S Parker; Bradley C Leibovich; Christine M Lohse; Yuri Sheinin; Susan M Kuntz; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Michael L Blute; Eugene D Kwon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Decoy receptor 3 is a prognostic factor in renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Stephan Macher-Goeppinger; Sebastian Aulmann; Nina Wagener; Benjamin Funke; Katrin E Tagscherer; Axel Haferkamp; Markus Hohenfellner; Sunghee Kim; Frank Autschbach; Peter Schirmacher; Wilfried Roth
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.715

10.  Determination of angptl4 mRNA as a diagnostic marker of primary and metastatic clear cell renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jérôme Verine; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; Hany Soliman; Jean-Paul Feugeas; Jean-Sébastien Vidal; Pierre Mongiat-Artus; Stéphanie Belhadj; Josette Philippe; Matthieu Lesage; Evelyne Wittmer; Stéphane Chanel; Anne Couvelard; Sophie Ferlicot; Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq; Jean-Michel Vignaud; Anne Janin; Stéphane Germain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.