| Literature DB >> 35645959 |
Wei You1, Junqiang Feng1, Huijian Ge1,2, Hengwei Jin1,2, Peng Liu1,2, Youxiang Li1,2, Yuhua Jiang1,2, Xinke Liu1,2.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The Neuroform EZ stent system (Boston Scientific Corporation, Fremont, CA, United States) is a fourth-generation intracranial aneurysm stent designed specifically for the cerebrovasculature to support aneurysm treatment. In this study, we analyzed our consecutive series of patients with aneurysm treated with the Neuroform EZ stent, with special attention to the occurrence of in-stent stenosis (ISS).Entities:
Keywords: bifurcated aneurysm; in-stent stenosis; intracranial aneurysm; neuroform-EZ stent; stent-assisted coiling
Year: 2022 PMID: 35645959 PMCID: PMC9136285 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.873014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses in association with in-stent stenosis (ISS).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||||
| Female | 12 (60%) | 66 (68.8%) | 78 (67.2%) | 0.6 | ||
| Mean (range) age, years | 52.6 ± 7.8 | 57.9 ± 9 | 57 ± 9 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.94 (0.88–0.998) |
|
| ||||||
| Hypertension | 11 (55%) | 60 (62.5%) | 71 (61.2%) | 0.62 | ||
| Diabetes | 2 (10%) | 11 (11.5%) | 13 (11.2%) | 1 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 0 (0%) | 5 (5.2%) | 5 (4.3%) | 0.59 | ||
| Current smoking | 6 (30%) | 12 (12.5%) | 18 (15.5%) | 0.08 | 0.28 | 2 (0.57–7.04) |
| Alcohol abuse | 3 (15%) | 14 (14.6%) | 17 (14.7%) | 1 | ||
| Symptomatic presentation of IA | 13 (65%) | 55 (57.3%) | 68 (58.6%) | 0.62 | ||
| Reptured (history of SAH) | 3 (15%) | 7 (7.3%) | 10 (8.6%) | 0.37 | ||
| Previous treatment of IA | 0 (0%) | 5 (5.2%) | 5 (4.3%) | 0.59 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Saccular aneurysm | 19 (95%) | 88 (91.7%) | 107 (92.2%) | 0.7 | ||
| Aneurysm size (max length, mm) | 6.52 ± 3.49 | 6.39 ± 3.82 | 6.41 ± 3.75 | 0.89 | ||
| Aneurysm neck size (mm) | 4.28 ± 2.13 | 4.61 ± 2.37 | 4.56 ± 2.32 | 0.57 | ||
| Bifurcation aneurysm | 11 (55%) | 18 (18.8%) | 29 (25%) | 0.002 | 0.006 | 4.59 (1.54–13.67) |
| Posterior circulating aneurysm | 7 (35%) | 16 (16.7%) | 23 (19.8%) | 0.07 | 0.43 | 1.6 (0.5–5.11) |
|
| ||||||
| RROC immediately | 0.36 | |||||
| 1 | 10 (50%) | 62 (64.6%) | 72 (62.1%) | |||
| 2 | 5 (25%) | 14 (14.6%) | 19 (16.4%) | |||
| 3 | 5 (25%) | 20 (20.8%) | 25 (21.6%) | |||
| RROC at first FU | 0.42 | |||||
| 1 | 14 (70%) | 76 (79.2%) | 90 (77.6%) | |||
| 2 | 2 (10%) | 10 (10.4%) | 12 (10.3%) | |||
| 3 | 4 (20%) | 10 (10.4%) | 14 (12.4%) | |||
IA, intracranial aneurysm; RROC, Raymond-Roy occlusion classification; FU, follow-up;
significant difference in univariate analysis;
significant difference in multivariate analysis.
Radiological and clinical characteristics of the ISS cases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49 | M | 14 | Mild | MCA bif | 6 | Diffuse, Middle | N/A | |
| 2 | 47 | F | 18 | Mild | ICA | 7 | Diffuse, Distal | N/A | |
| 3 | 43 | M | 18 | Mild | BA tip | 8 | Focal, Proximal | N/A | |
| 4 | 50 | M | 19 | Mild | AcomA | 7 | Focal, Proximal | N/A | |
| 5 | 43 | F | 23 | Mild | ICA | 6 | Focal, Distal | 13 | Stable |
| 6 | 59 | F | 24 | Mild | BA tip | 6 | Diffuse, Distal | N/A | |
| 7 | 41 | F | 25 | Moderate | BA trunk | 7 | Diffuse, Distal | 18 | Stable |
| 8 | 61 | F | 26 | Moderate | MCA bif | 7 | Diffuse, Proximal | N/A | |
| 9 | 55 | M | 28 | Moderate | ACA | 6 | Focal, Proximal | N/A | |
| 10 | 61 | F | 29 | Moderate | MCA bif | 8 | Diffuse, Distal | N/A | |
| 11 | 52 | F | 30 | Moderate | ICA | 5 | Diffuse, Middle | 29 | CR |
| 12 | 45 | M | 35 | Moderate | PCA | 5 | Focal, Proximal | N/A | |
| 13 | 41 | F | 35 | Moderate | ICA | 7 | Diffuse, Proximal | N/A | |
| 14 | 57 | F | 40 | Moderate | BA tip | 7 | Focal, Proximal | N/A | |
| 15 | 61 | M | 42 | Moderate | MCA bif | 7 | Diffuse, Proximal | N/A | |
| 16 | 60 | F | 44 | Moderate | ICA | 6 | Focal, Middle | N/A | |
| 17 | 50 | F | 65 | Severe | BA tip | 6 | Focal, Proximal | N/A | |
| 18 | 40 | M | 67 | Severe | ACA | 8 | Diffuse, Proximal | N/A | |
| 19 | 62 | F | 73 | Severe | MCA bif | 13 | Focal, Proximal | N/A | |
| 20 | 57 | M | 1 | Severe | BA tip | 6 | Diffuse, Distal | N/A | |
N/A, not applicable; F, female; M, male; y, years; bif, bifurcation; mo, month; FU, follow-up; CR, completely resolved; MCA, middle cerebral artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; BA, basilar artery; ACA, anterior cerebral artery; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; AComA, anterior communicating artery.
Figure 1In-stent stenosis case presentation. Case 1: (A) digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images showing an aneurysm located at the bifurcation of the left middle cerebral artery. Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) therapy was performed with the NF-EZ stent. (B) Angiography follow-up at 13 months showing severe ISS at the distal end of the stent. Case 2: (C,D) DSA images showing an aneurysm at the tip of the basilar artery. Two NF-EZ stents were used for the “Y” type SAC operation. (E,F) Six-month follow-up angiography showing multiple ISS, including (E) severe ISS in the left posterior cerebral artery at the distal of the stent and (F) moderate ISS in the basilar artery at the proximal end of the stent. The arrow shows the location of ISS.
Figure 2Case of ISS showing complete resolution during long-term angiographic follow-up. (A) A 52-year-old female had an aneurysm in the right internal carotid artery (ICA) a paraophthalmic aneurysm, and was treated with SAC therapy using the NF-EZ stent. On the immediate postoperative image, the marker at both ends of the stent showed that the stent was in the proper position. (B) Follow-up image at 5 months revealing extensive mild ISS. The patient was asymptomatic and continued to undergo dual antiplatelet therapy. (C) Angiography at 29 months follow-up revealing complete resolution of ISS. The arrow shows the location of ISS.
Figure 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the logistic regression classification model. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.8 with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.9 and 0.64 at the point of the cutoff value.