Literature DB >> 19349825

Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience.

Pedro Lylyk1, Carlos Miranda, Rosana Ceratto, Angel Ferrario, Esteban Scrivano, Hugh Ramirez Luna, Aaron L Berez, Quang Tran, Peter K Nelson, David Fiorella.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Pipeline embolization device (PED) (Chestnut Medical Technologies, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) is a new microcatheter-delivered endovascular construct designed to achieve the curative reconstruction of the parent arteries giving rise to wide-necked and fusiform intracranial aneurysms. We present our initial periprocedural experience with the PED and midterm follow-up results for a series of 53 patients.
METHODS: Patients harboring large and giant wide-necked, nonsaccular, and recurrent intracranial aneurysms were selected for treatment. All patients were pretreated with dual antiplatelet medications for at least 72 hours before surgery and continued taking both agents for at least 6 months after treatment. A control digital subtraction angiogram was typically performed at 3, 6, and 12 months.
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (age range, 11-77 years; average age, 55.2 years; 48 female) with 63 intracranial aneurysms were treated with the PED. Small (n = 33), large (n = 22), and giant (n = 8) wide-necked aneurysms were included. A total of 72 PEDs were used. Treatment was achieved with a single PED in 44 aneurysms, with 2 overlapping PEDs in 17 aneurysms, and with 3 overlapping PEDs in 2 aneurysms. The mean time between the treatment and last follow-up digital subtraction angiogram was 5.9 months (range, 1-22 months). Complete angiographic occlusion was achieved in 56%, 93%, and 95% of aneurysms at 3 (n = 42), 6 (n = 28), and 12 (n = 18) months, respectively. The only aneurysm that remained patent at the time of the 12-month follow-up examination had been treated previously with stent-supported coiling. The presence of a preexisting endoluminal stent may have limited the efficacy of the PED reconstruction in this aneurysm. No aneurysms demonstrated a deterioration of angiographic occlusion during the follow-up period (i.e., no recanalizations). No major complications (stroke or death) were encountered during the study period. Three patients (5%), all with giant aneurysms, experienced transient exacerbations of preexisting cranial neuropathies and headache after the PED treatment. All 3 were treated with corticosteroids, and these symptoms resolved within 1 month.
CONCLUSION: Endovascular reconstruction with the PED represents a safe, durable, and curative treatment of selected wide-necked, large and giant cerebral aneurysms. The rate of complete occlusion at the time of the 12-month follow-up examination approached 100% in the present study. To date, no angiographic recurrences have been observed during serial angiographic follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19349825     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  244 in total

1.  Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms.

Authors:  J P Cruz; M Chow; C O'Kelly; B Marotta; J Spears; W Montanera; D Fiorella; T Marotta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Endovascular repositioning of a pipeline embolization device dislocated from the vertebral into the basilar artery using a stent-in-stent technique. Practical and technical considerations.

Authors:  H U Kerl; M Al-Zghloul; C Groden; M A Brockmann
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 3.  Review of 2 decades of aneurysm-recurrence literature, part 1: reducing recurrence after endovascular coiling.

Authors:  E Crobeddu; G Lanzino; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Pipeline in clinical practice in 2011.

Authors:  David Fiorella
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Endovascular treatment of a ruptured blood blister-like aneurysm with a flow-diverting stent.

Authors:  S Rasskazoff; J Silvaggio; P A Brouwer; A Kaufmann; A Nistor; D Iancu
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Contrast-enhanced angiographic cone-beam CT of cerebrovascular stents: experimental optimization and clinical application.

Authors:  N V Patel; M J Gounis; A K Wakhloo; N Noordhoek; J Blijd; D Babic; D Takhtani; S-K Lee; A Norbash
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Endovascular management of cerebral aneurysm : review of the literature.

Authors:  Mario Zanaty; Nohra Chalouhi; Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris; Robert H Rosenwasser; Pascal M Jabbour
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 6.829

8.  Computational hemodynamics analysis of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters: correlation with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  W Chong; Y Zhang; Y Qian; L Lai; G Parker; K Mitchell
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: A one-year follow-up multicenter study.

Authors:  G Foa Torres; F Roca; A Noguera; J Godes; S Petrocelli; I Aznar; S Ales; P Muszynski; R Maehara; M Vicente; J M Pumar
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 1.610

10.  Disappearance of a small intracranial aneurysm as a result of vessel straightening and in-stent stenosis following use of an Enterprise vascular reconstruction device.

Authors:  Koichiro Takemoto; Satoshi Tateshima; Sachin Rastogi; Nestor Gonzalez; Reza Jahan; Gary Duckwiler; Fernando Vinuela
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.