| Literature DB >> 35645805 |
Xuefei Yu1, Xuhang Zhu2, Lizhuo Zhang3, Jiang-Jiang Qin4, Chunlai Feng1, Qinglin Li5.
Abstract
Aberrant activation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) has been implicated in tumorigenesis and radioiodine resistance of thyroid cancer, indicating its therapeutic potential. In the present study, we confirmed the association between PDGFRA and radioiodine resistance in thyroid cancer using bioinformatics analysis and constructed a prediction model of PDGFRA inhibitors using machine learning and molecular docking approaches. We then performed a virtual screening of a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) derived compound library and successfully identified 4',5,7-trimethoxyflavone as a potential PDGFRA inhibitor. Further characterization revealed a significant inhibitory effect of 4',5,7-trimethoxyflavone on PDGFRA-MAPK pathway activation, and that it could upregulate expression of sodium iodide symporter (NIS) as well as improve radioiodine uptake capacity of radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer (RAIR-TC), suggesting it a potential drug lead for the development of new RAIR-TC therapy.Entities:
Keywords: PDGFRA inhibitors; machine learning; radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer; traditional Chinese medicine; virtual screening
Year: 2022 PMID: 35645805 PMCID: PMC9133930 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.883581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1The virtual screening workflow adopted in this study.
Compounds for model construction.
| Category | Label | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total number | |
| Training set | 345 | 455 | 800 |
| Test set | 78 | 122 | 200 |
| Screening set | — | — | 2994 |
FIGURE 2The correlation between RDGFRA and radioiodine uptake of thyroid cancer. (A) The expression of PDGFRA in different types of thyroid cancer from Oncomine database. *, p <0.05, compared with normal group. (B) The biological correlation between PDGFRA and related regulatory genes was analyzed based on STRING database. (C) Correlation between PDGFRA and PAX8 based on cBioPortal database. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival-time of PDGFRA mRNA expression based on cBioPortal database. DTC: Differentiated Thyroid Cancer; ATC: Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.
Optimal parameters and overall Performance of Random Forest Prediction Model.
| v | n_estimator | max_depth | min_sample_split | min_sample_leaf | ACC (%) | P | R (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 177 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 89 | 83% | 91 |
v: Number of folds for cross-validation; ACC: accuracy; P: precision; R: recall.
FIGURE 3Selection of feature descriptors based on Random Forest model. (A) AUC of Random Forest model under the best parameters. (B) Feature importance scores calculated by the Random Forest model. AUC: area under receiver operating characteristic curve.
The 93 molecular descriptors filtered by the Random Forest model.
| Descriptor class | Descriptors | Number |
|---|---|---|
| Physical properties | apol, h_logD, rsynth | 3 |
| Subdivided surface areas | SlogP_VSA0,SlogP_VSA1,SlogP_VSA2,SlogP_VSA3,SlogP_VSA4,SlogP_VSA5,SlogP_VSA9,SMR_VSA1,SMR_VSA2,SMR_VSA3,SMR_VSA4,SMR_VSA7 | 12 |
| Atom counts and bond counts | a_aro,a_ICM,a_nN,a_nS,b_1rotN,b_1rotR,b_max1len,chiral,opr_brigid | 9 |
| Partial charge descriptors | PEOE_RPC+,PEOE_RPC-,PEOE_VSA+0,PEOE_VSA+1,PEOE_VSA+2,PEOE_VSA+3, PEOE_VSA-0,PEOE_VSA-1,PEOE_VSA-3,PEOE_VSA-4,PEOE_VSA-5,PEOE_VSA-6, PEOE_VSA_FHYD, PEOE_VSA_FNEG,Q_RPC+,Q_RPC- | 16 |
| Pharmacophore feature descriptors | a_don, vsa_acc, vsa_don, vsa_other | 4 |
| Adjacency and distance matrix descriptors | BalabanJ,BCUT_PEOE_0,BCUT_SLOGP_1,GCUT_PEOE_1,GCUT_SLOGP_0,GCUT_SLOGP_1 | 6 |
| Potential energy descriptors | E,E_ang,E_ele,E_oop,E_sol,E_tor | 6 |
| MOPAC descriptors | MNDO_dipole | 1 |
| Surface area descriptors | dens,glob,npr1,pmi1,pmiX,pmiY,pmiZ,std_dim2,std_dim3,vsurf_A,vsurf_CP,vsurf_CW2,vsurf_EDmin1,vsurf_EWmin1,vsurf_HB1,vsurf_HL1,vsurf_IW1,vsurf_IW7,vsurf_IW8 | 19 |
| Conformation dependent Charge Descriptors | ASA+,ASA-,ASA_P,CASA-,dipole,dipoleX,dipoleY,dipoleZ,FASA+,FASA- | 10 |
| Hueckel theory descriptors | h_ema,h_logD,h_pavgQ,h_pKa,h_pKb,h_pstates,h_pstrain | 7 |
FIGURE 4Construction and optimization of SVM based prediction model. (A) Parameter optimization results based on Grid search and cross validation. (B) AUC of SVM based prediction model under the best parameters. AUC: area under receiver operating characteristic curve.
Optimal parameters and overall Performance of SVM based prediction model.
| v | c | Gamma | Kernel | ACC (%) | P (%) | R (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 8 | 0.03135 | rbf | 94 | 88 | 97 |
v: Number of folds for cross-validation; ACC: accuracy; P: precision; R: recall.
Screening results of active TCM ingredients based on SVM based prediction model.
| CID | Name | TCM name | CID | Name | TCM name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11066 | Oxyberberine | Coptidis Rhizoma | 5281636 | Gentisin | Dipsaci Radix |
| 68077 | Tangeretin | Citrus Reticulata、Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium Viride, Aurantii Fructus Immaturus | 5281704 | Afrormosin | licorice、Spatholobus Suberectus Dunn |
| 79730 | 4',5,7-Trimethoxyflavone | Aurantii Fructus Immaturus | 5317756 | Glycycoumarin | licorice |
| 124050 | Isoglycyrol | Licorice | 5319013 | Licoricone | licorice |
| 150032 | Menisporphine | Phellodendri Chinrnsis Cortex | 5319422 | 3'-Methoxydaidzein | Polygonati Rhizoma |
| 160921 | Nevadensin | Asparagi Radix | 5319744 | 3'-O-Methylorobol | Ecliptae Herba |
| 161271 | Salvigenin | Scutellariae Barbatae Herba、Scutellariae Radix | 5320083 | Glycyrol | licorice、Amygdalus Communis Vas |
| 161748 | Myricanone | Chuanxiong Rhizoma | 5320290 | Onjixanthone I | Forsythiae Fructus |
| 185034 | Sainfuran | Radix Bupleuri | 5352005 | Retusin | Agastacherugosus (Fisch.etMey)O.Ktze |
| 442694 | Batatasin I | Rhizoma Dioscoreae | 11983285 | Confusarin | Dendrobium nobile Lindl |
| 480787 | Glycyrin | licorice | 13965473 | Odoratin | licorice、Spatholobus Suberectus Dunn |
| 480817 | Gancaonin V | licorice | 13970974 | 4,6-Dimethoxy-7-(3-methylbut-2-enoxy)furo [2,3-b]quinoline | Dendrobium nobile Lindl |
| 629964 | 4',5,7,8-Tetramethoxyflavone | Aurantii Fructus Immaturus | 14187587 | Isoglycycoumarin | licorice |
| 688717 | 3-Hydroxy-2',4',7-trimethoxyflavone | Lonicerae Japonicae Flos | 14353376 | 5-Hydroxy-7,8,4'-trimethoxyflavone | Scutellariae Barbatae Herba |
| 5281601 | Apigenin dimethylether | Scutellariae Barbatae Herba、Lonicerae Japonicae Flos、Epimrdii Herba | 44257530 | Phaseol | licorice、Amygdalus Communis Vas |
Docking results of potential inhibitors with PDGFRA.
| CID | S | NHB | Binding site | CID | S | NHB | Binding site |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11066 | −6.03787 | 1 | GLU556 | 5281636 | −5.09768 | 2 | ILE965/SER783 |
| 68077 | −6.36916 | 1 | THR855 | 5281704 | −5.76621 | 1 | ARG560 |
| 79730 | −6.50424 | 1 | GLU556 | 5317756 | −6.18588 | 0 | — |
| 124050 | −5.93374 | 0 | — | 5319013 | −6.12188 | 0 | — |
| 150032 | −5.51394 | 0 | — | 5319422 | −5.3683 | 2 | GLU556/ARG554 |
| 160921 | −5.67415 | 0 | — | 5319744 | −5.35448 | 0 | — |
| 161271 | −6.12935 | 2 | GLN828/MET622 | 5320083 | −5.89688 | 1 | ARG554 |
| 161748 | −6.14682 | 1 | LYS833 | 5320290 | −5.55545 | 0 | — |
| 185034 | −5.70737 | 0 | — | 5352005 | −6.20545 | 2 | SER847/ARG841 |
| 442694 | −5.52984 | 1 | ARG560 | 11983285 | −5.63999 | 1 | ARG817 |
| 480787 | −5.8909 | 2 | GLU556/ARG817 | 13965473 | −5.63319 | 0 | — |
| 480817 | −5.84344 | 1 | ASP968 | 13970974 | −5.84314 | 2 | ARG554/THR855 |
| 629964 | −6.08919 | 2 | TYR679/GLY680 | 14187587 | −6.21415 | 0 | — |
| 688717 | −6.19365 | 1 | ARG597 | 14353376 | −5.47657 | 2 | GLU675/ILE965 |
| 5281601 | −5.77296 | 1 | ARG560 | 44257530 | −5.74329 | 0 | — |
NHB: number of hydrogen bonds.
FIGURE 5Docking results of the top 4 compounds with PDGFRA. 79730, 68077, 5352005, and 161271 are PubChem CID of 4’,5,7-Trimethoxyflavone, Tangeretin, Retusin, and Salvigenin, respectively. PDGFRA protein is shown as a white surface model, while the ligand is shown as a green stick model. The hydrogen bond is shown as the dotted lines. In the 2D interaction diagram, the ligand is shown as a chemical formula, the residues are shown in purple circles marked with their names, and the hydrogen bond is shown as the green dotted lines.
FIGURE 6Biological validation of the virtually screened PDGFRA inhibitors. (A) The effect of 4’,5,7-trimethoxyflavone on the viability of thyroid carcinoma cells and normal thyroid cells. (B) The expression of PDGFRA in thyroid carcinoma cells and normal thyroid cells. (C) The effect of 4’,5,7-trimethoxyflavone on radioiodine uptake capacity of IHH4 cell line. (D,E) The effect of 4’,5,7-trimethoxyflavone on protein expression of p-PDGFRA and p-p38. (F) The binding of 4’,5,7-trimethoxyflavone to PDGFRA was examined by the CETSA test. (G) The effect of 4’,5,7-trimethoxyflavone on expression and cellular location of NIS. ***, p <0.001, compared with control group. Nthy: Nthy-ori-3-1 cell line; Tri: 4’,5,7-trimethoxyflavone; p-PDGFRA: phospho-PDGFRA (Tyr754); p-p38: phospho-p38 MAPK (Tyr 182).