| Literature DB >> 35645507 |
Srikanth S Raju1, Rajendra E Reddy1, Thabitha S Rani1, Kiranmayi Merum1, Srujana P Mudusu1, Ajay M Tulluru1.
Abstract
Aim and objective: This study was carried out to comparatively assess the efficiency of four methods of obturation viz Lentulo spiral, Navi tip syringe, Bi directional spiral, and Past inject carrier in deciduous teeth using vista scan. Materials and methods: A total sample of 100 primary root canals [4 groups of 25 canals each] with 2/3rd of root length were selected and randomly allocated into four different obturating techniques, i.e., Group I: Lentulo spiral, Group II: Navi tip syringe, Group III: Bi directional spiral, and Group IV: Past inject carrier. The quality of obturation [Coll and sadrain, 1996] and presence or absence of voids were evaluated by using Vista scan. The recorded data was statistically analyzed.Entities:
Keywords: Deciduous teeth; Obturation techniques; Quality of obturation; Vista scan; Voids
Year: 2022 PMID: 35645507 PMCID: PMC9108824 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ISSN: 0974-7052
Fig. 1Four obturating systems (I–Lentulo spiral, II- Navi tip syringe, III- Bi-directional spiral, IV- Micro mega past inject)
Fig. 2Optimally filled canal obtained by Lentulospiral technique
Fig. 5Void shown in obturation done by Navitip syringe technique
Descriptive statistics of percentage, mean rank value and p value of under filled, optimally filled canals, and over filled canals obtained with different obturation techniques
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Group I | 72 | 50.00 | 16 | 50.00 | 12 | 51.50 |
| Group II | 64 | 46.00 | 36 | 60.00 | 00 | 45.50 |
| Group III | 68 | 48.00 | 04 | 44.00 | 28 | 59.50 |
| Group IV | 88 | 58.00 | 12 | 48.00 | 00 | 45.50 |
| 0.224 | 0.021 | 0.002 | ||||
Descriptive statistics of percentage of presence and absence of voids and p value obtained with four obturation techniques
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | 4 (16%) | 21 (84%) | 0.396 |
| Group II | 4 (16%) | 21 (84%) | |
| Group III | 8 (32%) | 17 (68%) | |
| Group IV | 4 (16%) | 21 (84%) |
Intergroup comparison with Mann Whitney test between all the groups in under filled, optimal filled canals, and over filled canals
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Group I vs II | −1.76 | 0.077 | −0.917 | 0.359 | −1.59 | 0.111 |
| Group I vs III | −1.40 | 0.162 | −0.624 | 0.533 | −1.40 | 0.162 |
| Group I vs IV | −1.76 | 0.077 | −1.09 | 0.274 | −0.403 | 0.687 |
| Group II vs III | −2.82 | 0.005 * | −0.296 | 0.768 | −2.80 | 0.005* |
| Group II vs IV | 0.000 | 1.00 | −1.96 | 0.049* | −1.96 | 0.049* |
| Group III vs IV | −2.82 | .005 * | −1.69 | 0.091 | −1.03 | .302 |
Z value–Mann Whitney test; p value–probability; *Significant at p < 0.05