Literature DB >> 35643081

Cross-species incompatibility between a DNA satellite and the Drosophila Spartan homolog poisons germline genome integrity.

Cara L Brand1, Mia T Levine2.   

Abstract

Satellite DNA spans megabases of eukaryotic sequence and evolves rapidly.1-6 Paradoxically, satellite-rich genomic regions mediate strictly conserved, essential processes such as chromosome segregation and nuclear structure.7-10 A leading resolution to this paradox posits that satellite DNA and satellite-associated chromosomal proteins coevolve to preserve these essential functions.11 We experimentally test this model of intragenomic coevolution by conducting the first evolution-guided manipulation of both chromosomal protein and DNA satellite. The 359bp satellite spans an 11 Mb array in Drosophila melanogaster that is absent from its sister species, Drosophila simulans.12-14 This species-specific DNA satellite colocalizes with the adaptively evolving, ovary-enriched protein, maternal haploid (MH), the Drosophila homolog of Spartan.15 To determine if MH and 359bp coevolve, we swapped the D. simulans version of MH ("MH[sim]") into D. melanogaster. MH[sim] triggers ovarian cell death, reduced ovary size, and loss of mature eggs. Surprisingly, the D. melanogaster mh-null mutant has no such ovary phenotypes,15 suggesting that MH[sim] is toxic in a D. melanogaster background. Using both cell biology and genetics, we discovered that MH[sim] poisons oogenesis through a DNA-damage pathway. Remarkably, deleting the D. melanogaster-specific 359bp satellite array completely restores mh[sim] germline genome integrity and fertility, consistent with a history of coevolution between these two fast-evolving loci. Germline genome integrity and fertility are also restored by overexpressing topoisomerase II (Top2), suggesting that MH[sim] interferes with Top2-mediated processing of 359bp. The observed 359bp-MH[sim] cross-species incompatibility supports a model under which seemingly inert repetitive DNA and essential chromosomal proteins must coevolve to preserve germline genome integrity.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  359bp; DNA satellite; Drosophila; Spartan; coevolution; maternal haploid; topoisomerase II

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35643081      PMCID: PMC9283324          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.900


  75 in total

Review 1.  Eggs over easy: cell death in the Drosophila ovary.

Authors:  Kimberly McCall
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Mouse minor satellite DNA genetically maps to the centromere and is physically linked to the proximal telomere.

Authors:  D Kipling; H E Ackford; B A Taylor; H J Cooke
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.736

3.  DNA double-strand break-induced phosphorylation of Drosophila histone variant H2Av helps prevent radiation-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  James P Madigan; Heather L Chotkowski; Robert L Glaser
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Hybrid lethal systems in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. II. The Zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr) gene of D. melanogaster.

Authors:  K Sawamura; M T Yamamoto; T K Watanabe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Cytogenetical localization of Zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr), a Drosophila melanogaster gene that rescues interspecific hybrids from embryonic lethality.

Authors:  K Sawamura; M T Yamamoto
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1993-06

6.  Mapping simple repeated DNA sequences in heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A R Lohe; A J Hilliker; P A Roberts
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Centromere strength provides the cell biological basis for meiotic drive and karyotype evolution in mice.

Authors:  Lukáš Chmátal; Sofia I Gabriel; George P Mitsainas; Jessica Martínez-Vargas; Jacint Ventura; Jeremy B Searle; Richard M Schultz; Michael A Lampson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Metalloprotease SPRTN/DVC1 Orchestrates Replication-Coupled DNA-Protein Crosslink Repair.

Authors:  Bruno Vaz; Marta Popovic; Joseph A Newman; John Fielden; Hazel Aitkenhead; Swagata Halder; Abhay Narayan Singh; Iolanda Vendrell; Roman Fischer; Ignacio Torrecilla; Neele Drobnitzky; Raimundo Freire; David J Amor; Paul J Lockhart; Benedikt M Kessler; Gillies W McKenna; Opher Gileadi; Kristijan Ramadan
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 9.  Type II DNA Topoisomerases Cause Spontaneous Double-Strand Breaks in Genomic DNA.

Authors:  Suguru Morimoto; Masataka Tsuda; Heeyoun Bunch; Hiroyuki Sasanuma; Caroline Austin; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Evolution of genome structure in the Drosophila simulans species complex.

Authors:  Mahul Chakraborty; Ching-Ho Chang; Danielle E Khost; Jeffrey Vedanayagam; Jeffrey R Adrion; Yi Liao; Kristi L Montooth; Colin D Meiklejohn; Amanda M Larracuente; J J Emerson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  3 in total

1.  Testing the Drosophila maternal haploid gene for functional divergence and a role in hybrid incompatibility.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Benjamin McCormick; Connor M Kean; Sahana Natesan; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.542

Review 2.  Meiotic drive in house mice: mechanisms, consequences, and insights for human biology.

Authors:  Uma P Arora; Beth L Dumont
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.620

3.  In-Depth Satellitome Analyses of 37 Drosophila Species Illuminate Repetitive DNA Evolution in the Drosophila Genus.

Authors:  Leonardo G de Lima; Francisco J Ruiz-Ruano
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.065

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.