Literature DB >> 35876798

Testing the Drosophila maternal haploid gene for functional divergence and a role in hybrid incompatibility.

Dean M Castillo1,2, Benjamin McCormick2, Connor M Kean2, Sahana Natesan2, Daniel A Barbash2.   

Abstract

Crosses between Drosophila simulans females and Drosophila melanogaster males produce viable F1 sons and poorly viable F1 daughters. Unlike most hybrid incompatibilities, this hybrid incompatibility violates Haldane's rule, the observation that incompatibilities preferentially affect the heterogametic sex. Furthermore, it has a different genetic basis than hybrid lethality in the reciprocal cross, with the causal allele in Drosophila melanogaster being a large species-specific block of complex satellite DNA on its X chromosome known as the 359-bp satellite, rather than a protein-coding locus. The causal allele(s) in Drosophila simulans are unknown but likely involve maternally expressed genes or factors since the F1 females die during early embryogenesis. The maternal haploid (mh) gene is an intriguing candidate because it is expressed maternally and its protein product localizes to the 359-bp repeat. We found that this gene has diverged extensively between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. This observation led to the hypothesis that Drosophila melanogaster mh may have coevolved with the 359-bp repeat and that hybrid incompatibility thus results from the absence of a coevolved mh allele in Drosophila simulans. We tested for the functional divergence of mh by creating matched transformants of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans orthologs in both Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans strains. Surprisingly, we find that Drosophila simulans mh fully complements the female sterile phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster mh mutations. Contrary to our hypothesis, we find no evidence that adding a Drosophila melanogaster mh gene to Drosophila simulans increases hybrid viability.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Drosophilazzm321990 ; hybrid incompatibilities; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35876798      PMCID: PMC9434238          DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)        ISSN: 2160-1836            Impact factor:   3.542


  38 in total

1.  Developmental defects of female-sterile mutants of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Zalokar; C Audit; I Erk
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Genetic rescue of inviable hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species.

Authors:  P Hutter; M Ashburner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 May 28-Jun 3       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Two distinct mechanisms generate endogenous siRNAs from bidirectional transcription in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Katsutomo Okamura; Sudha Balla; Raquel Martin; Na Liu; Eric C Lai
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-25       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Mapping simple repeated DNA sequences in heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A R Lohe; A J Hilliker; P A Roberts
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  An essential cell cycle regulation gene causes hybrid inviability in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nitin Phadnis; EmilyClare P Baker; Jacob C Cooper; Kimberly A Frizzell; Emily Hsieh; Aida Flor A de la Cruz; Jay Shendure; Jacob O Kitzman; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A second-generation assembly of the Drosophila simulans genome provides new insights into patterns of lineage-specific divergence.

Authors:  Tina T Hu; Michael B Eisen; Kevin R Thornton; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Genetic and Transgenic Reagents for Drosophila simulans, D. mauritiana, D. yakuba, D. santomea, and D. virilis.

Authors:  David L Stern; Justin Crocker; Yun Ding; Nicolas Frankel; Gretchen Kappes; Elizabeth Kim; Ryan Kuzmickas; Andrew Lemire; Joshua D Mast; Serge Picard
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Highly Contiguous Genome Assemblies of 15 Drosophila Species Generated Using Nanopore Sequencing.

Authors:  Danny E Miller; Cynthia Staber; Julia Zeitlinger; R Scott Hawley
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Dynamic Evolution of Euchromatic Satellites on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and the simulans Clade.

Authors:  John S Sproul; Danielle E Khost; Danna G Eickbush; Sherif Negm; Xiaolu Wei; Isaac Wong; Amanda M Larracuente
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Evolution of genome structure in the Drosophila simulans species complex.

Authors:  Mahul Chakraborty; Ching-Ho Chang; Danielle E Khost; Jeffrey Vedanayagam; Jeffrey R Adrion; Yi Liao; Kristi L Montooth; Colin D Meiklejohn; Amanda M Larracuente; J J Emerson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.