| Literature DB >> 35642325 |
Rawah H Elkousy1, Nada M Mostafa2, Ahmed M Abd-Alkhalek3, Mahmoud A El Hassab4, Sara T Al-Rashood5, Wagdy M Eldehna6,7, Omayma A Eldahshan2,8.
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori can cause chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric carcinoma. This study compares chemical composition and anti-H. pylori activity of mandarin leaves and marjoram herb essential oils, and their combined oil. GC/MS analysis of mandarin oil revealed six compounds (100% identified), mainly methyl-N-methyl anthranilate (89.93%), and 13 compounds (93.52% identified) of marjoram oil, mainly trans-sabinene hydrate (36.11%), terpinen-4-ol (17.97%), linalyl acetate (9.18%), and caryophyllene oxide (8.25%)). Marjoram oil (MIC = 11.40 µg/mL) demonstrated higher activity than mandarin oil (MIC = 31.25 µg/mL). The combined oil showed a synergistic effect at MIC of 1.95 µg/mL (same as clarithromycin). In-silico molecular docking on H. pylori urease, CagA, pharmacokinetic and toxicity studies were performed on major compounds from both oils. The best scores were for caryophyllene oxide then linalyl acetate and methyl-N-methyl anthranilate. Compounds revealed high safety and desirable properties. The combined oil can be an excellent candidate to manage H. pylori.Entities:
Keywords: Helicobacter pylori; Marjoram oil; clarithromycin; essential oils; petitgrain mandarin oil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35642325 PMCID: PMC9176704 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2022.2081846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.756
Figure 1.GC-MS Chromatogram of mandarin oil.
The essential oil composition of mandarin leaves oil.
| Peak no. | Components | Molecular formula | Retention time (min) | RIcal | RILit | % Composition | Method of identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | C10H14 | 10.105 | 1015 | 1018 | 0.72 | RI, MS | |
| 2. | Limonene | C10H16 | 10.228 | 1019 | 1022 | 1.35 | RI, MS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. | C15H24 | 21.876 | 1411 | 1418 | 1.11 | RI, MS | |
| 6. | Caryophyllene oxide | C15H24O | 26.104 | 1576 | 1572 | 0.63 | RI, MS |
|
|
|
Major compounds are in bold.
Figure 2.GC-MS Chromatogram of marjoram oil.
The essential oil composition of marjoram oil.
| Peak no. | Components | Molecular formula | Retention time (min) | RIcal | RILit | % Composition | Method of identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Camphene | C10H16 | 8.530 | 959 | 953 | 0.65 | RI, MS |
| 2. | C10H14 | 10.114 | 1015 | 1018 | 3.18 | RI, MS | |
| 3. | C10H16 | 11.452 | 1058 | 1059 | 3.51 | RI, MS | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. | Dehydro Sabinene ketone | C9H12O | 13.137 | 1112 | 1117 | 1.12 | RI, MS |
| 6. | 3-Isothujenol | C10H18O | 13.703 | 1130 | 1134 | 0.82 | RI, MS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10. | U.I. | – | 17.659 | 1263 | – | 2.55 | – |
| 11. | Bornyl acetate | C15H18O2 | 18.199 | 1281 | 1280 | 1.24 | RI, MS |
| 12. | 3-Thujanyl acetate | C12H20O2 | 18.485 | 1291 | 1295 | 0.53 | RI, MS |
| 13 | U.I. | – | 18.560 | 1294 | – | 2.10 | – |
| 14 | U.I. | – | 20.200 | 1351 | – | 1.94 | – |
| 15 | U.I. | – | 23.502 | 1475 | – | 2.45 | – |
| 16 | Spathulenol | C15H24O | 25.961 | 1571 | 1577 | 2.24 | RI, MS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 93.52 | ||||||
U.I.: Unidentified, major compounds are in bold.
Figure 3.The MIC90 & MIC graphs of Anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of mandarin oil leaves (A), marjoram oil (B), equal amounts of both oils(C), and Clarithromycin (D) as standard. All determinations were carried out in a triplicate manner and values are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Docking scores of marjoram and mandarin major oil compounds on H. pylori virulent factors domains (urease and CagA).
| Compound name | Urease (1e9y) | Cag A (4dvy) |
|---|---|---|
| Caryophyllene oxide | −11.4 | −9.5 |
| Linalyl acetate | −9.1 | −8.3 |
| Methyl- | −8.9 | −8.2 |
| α- Terpineol | −7.6 | −7.4 |
| −7.4 | −6.9 | |
| Terpine-4-ol | −7.2 | −7.1 |
| γ-Terpinene | −6.6 | −5.4 |
The predicted toxicity of marjoram and mandarin major oil compounds.
| Compound name | Any potential toxicity | Predicted LD50 |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 mg/kg | None | |
| Terpine-4-ol | 1016 mg/kg | None |
| Linalyl acetate | 12000 mg/kg | None |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 5000 mg/kg | None |
| α-Terpineol | 2830 mg/kg | None |
| Methyl- | 2910 mg/kg | None |
| γ-Terpinene | 2500 mg/kg | None |
The predicted pharmacokinetics of marjoram and mandarin major oil compounds.
| Parameter | Terpine-4-ol | Linalyl acetate | Caryophyllene oxide | α-Terpineol | Methyl- | γ-Terpinene | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIA | High | High | High | High | High | High | High |
| BBB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| P-gP substrate | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| CYP1A2 inhibitor | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
| CYP2C19 inhibitor | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No |
| CYP2C9 inhibitor | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No |
| CYP2D6 inhibitor | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| CYP3A4 inhibitor | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Lipinski Violations | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| PAINS | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
GIA (gastrointestinal absorption), BBB (Blood Brain Barrier), PgP (P-glyco pro- tein transporter), CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 are the five forms of cytochromes P450 (CYP). PAINS (Pan Assay Interference).
Figure 6.The predicted physicochemical properties for selected compounds, such as linalyl acetate (A) and trans-sabinene hydrate (B).