| Literature DB >> 35642008 |
Lauretta Turin1, Sara Surini2, Nick Wheelhouse3, Mara Silvia Rocchi4.
Abstract
Environmental transmission of Chlamydia abortus as a result of enzootic disease or disease outbreaks and the threats posed by this pathogen has been previously reported, however a state-of-the-science review of these reports and the identification of future research priorities in this area is still lacking. This study provides an overview of the current knowledge of host-pathogen-environment interactions, addressing public health risks and identifying critical questions and research gaps. We performed a systematic PubMed and Web of Science search for publications related to Chlamydia abortus in the past four decades, and we reviewed and combined the evidence critically discussing and commenting the results. A total of 182 studies, 5 chapters of specific books and the "OIE terrestrial manual" were included in this review. There were substantial variations between the studies in topic addressed and experimental design. Overall, the literature largely supports the crucial role played by environmental exposure on the acquisition of zoonotic disease caused by Chlamydia abortus. We also identify the paucity of information related to interspecies transmission and pathogen adaptation in relation to environmental dissemination and zoonotic risk. This analysis further highlights the need for additional research given that environmental transmission represents a serious risk not only to susceptible patients (pregnant women and immunocompromised individuals), but also for other species including wildlife.Entities:
Keywords: Chlamydia abortus; environmental exposure; interspecies transmission; public health
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35642008 PMCID: PMC9152823 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-022-01052-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.829
Figure 1Schematic representation of developmental cycle.
Figuer 2Representation of the global spread of The reconstruction of the map is based on the collection of data available to date, not exhaustive and probably far from representing the real situation. In addition, the tests used in the seroprevalence study have varying specificity levels, sometimes confusing some Chlamydial species. A The percentage of seroprevalence in the different countries where the studies were conducted (different color). B The percentage of seroprevalence in the different countries (spot size) and the animal species concerned (different color).