| Literature DB >> 35641987 |
Shruthi Sriramkumar1,2, Riddhi Sood2,3, Thomas D Huntington2, Ahmed H Ghobashi2,3, Truc T Vuong1,2, Tara X Metcalfe1,2, Weini Wang1,2, Kenneth P Nephew1,2,3,4,5, Heather M O'Hagan6,7,8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Platinum based agents-cisplatin and carboplatin in combination with taxanes are used for the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) patients. However, the majority of OC patients develop recurrent, platinum resistant disease that is uniformly fatal. Platinum treatment enriches for chemoresistant aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) + ovarian cancer stem cells (OCSCs), which contribute to tumor recurrence and disease relapse. Acquired platinum resistance also includes metabolic reprograming and switching to oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Chemosensitive cells rely on glycolysis while chemoresistant cells have the ability to switch between glycolysis and OXPHOS, depending on which pathway drives a selective advantage for growth and chemoresistance. High expression of genes involved in OXPHOS and high production of mitochondrial ROS are characteristics of OCSCs, suggesting that OCSCs favor OXPHOS over glycolysis. Based on connections between OCSCs, chemoresistance and OXPHOS, we hypothesize that platinum treatment induces changes in metabolism that contribute to platinum-induced enrichment of OCSCs.Entities:
Keywords: ALDH + cells; Cancer stem cells; Chemoresistance; OXPHOS; Ovarian cancer; Platinum; SIRT1
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35641987 PMCID: PMC9153190 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03447-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 8.440
Fig. 1Mitochondrial OXPHOS activity increases in response to cisplatin treatment in OC cells. Scatter plots of OVCAR5 (A) and OVSAHO (B) cells untreated or treated with 12 µM and 4 µM cisplatin, respectively, for 16 h followed by staining with JC-1 for 30 min and analysis by flow cytometry. Histogram of untreated and cisplatin treated OVCAR5 (C) and OVSAHO (D) cells after JC-1 staining as in A and B. Ratio of red to green fluorescence intensity in untreated and cisplatin treated OVCAR5 (E) and OVSAHO (F) cells after JC-1 staining as in A and B. The OXPHOS inhibitor carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (OXPHOSi) was used as an assay control. Graphs display mean ratio of red to green fluorescence ± SEM (N = 3). Student t-test was used to calculate statistical significance. For all untreated versus cisplatin treated, P values *< 0.05, **< 0.005 and ***< 0.0005
Fig. 2Expression of genes involved in mitochondrial OXPHOS increases after cisplatin treatment. Gene expression of the indicated genes by RT-qPCR in OVCAR5 (A) OVCAR3 (B) and OVSAHO (C) cells untreated or treated with 12 µM, 15 µM or 4 µM cisplatin, respectively, for 16 h. Expression of HIF-1α in OVCAR5 (D) and OVCAR3 (E) cells treated as in A and C. F OVCAR5 cells were untreated (U) or treated with 12 µM cisplatin for 16 h (T). Cell lysates were collected and analyzed for indicated proteins by western blot. G c-Myc expression in untreated (U) or 12 µM cisplatin treated (T) OVCAR5 cells. Expression of the indicated glycolysis genes in OVCAR5 (H), OVCAR3 (I) and OVSAHO cells (J) treated as in A, B and C, respectively. Graphs display mean fold change ± SEM relative to untreated. Expression of all the genes was normalized to the house keeping gene Actin B. For all untreated versus cisplatin treated, P values *< 0.05, **< 0.005 and ***< 0.0005
Fig. 3Mitochondrial OXPHOS inhibitors in combination with cisplatin block the platinum-induced increase in percent ALDH + cells. Percent ALDH + OVCAR5 (A) and OVSAHO cells (B) untreated or treated with 12 µM or 4 µM cisplatin, respectively, alone or in combination with DMSO or 5 µM Rotenone for 16 h followed by ALDEFLUOR assay. Percentage ALDH + OVCAR5 (C) and OVSAHO (D, E) cells treated with cisplatin alone or in combination with DMSO or 1 µM IACS-010759 for 16 h followed by ALDEFLUOR assay. D Shows gates used to determine ALDH + cells for one biological replicate of OVSAHO cells treated with DMSO or IACS in combination with cisplatin. F Percent ALDH + OVCAR5 cells treated with cisplatin alone or in combination with DMSO or 1 µM oligomycin for 16 h followed by ALDEFLUOR assay. Graphs display mean ± SEM percent ALDH + cells in N = 3 biological replicates. G Spheroid formation assay in OVCAR5 cells pre-treated for 3 h with DMSO or 1 μM IACS-010759 alone or in combination with 6 μM cisplatin and cultured for 14 days. For all untreated versus cisplatin treated, P values *< 0.05, **< 0.005, ***< 0.0005, ****< 0.0001
Fig. 4Platinum-induced increase in SIRT1 activity contributes to the enrichment of ALDH + cells. OVCAR5 (A), OVCAR3 (B) and OVSAHO (C) were untreated (U) or treated with respective IC50 dose of cisplatin (T) for 16 h (OVCAR5—12 μM, OVCAR3—15 μM and OVSAHO—4 μM). Cell lysates were collected and analyzed by western blot. A Graph displays mean ± SEM densitometric analysis of N = 3 biological replicates of H4K16ac relative to total H2A. Relative expression of SIRT1 in OVCAR5 (D), OVCAR3 (E) and OVSAHO (F) cells treated as in A, B and C, respectively. G OVCAR5 cells infected with empty vector (EV) or SIRT1 viral shRNA followed by treatment as in A. Lysates were collected and analyzed by western blot for the indicated proteins. H OVCAR5 cells infected EV or SIRT1 viral shRNA, untreated or treated as in A followed by ALDEFLUOR assay. Graph shows mean ± SEM percent ALDH + cells in N = 3 biological replicates. Percent ALDH + OVCAR5 (I) and OVSAHO (J) cells treated with cisplatin alone or in combination with DMSO or 3 µM Ex-527 for 16 h followed by ALDEFLUOR assay. Graph depicts mean ± SEM percent ALDH + cells in N = 3 biological replicates. (K) Correlation analysis of SIRT1 and TFAM expression using RNA-seq data from TCGA OC patient dataset. L Relative expression of SIRT1 and TFAM in OVCAR5 cells infected with EV or SIRT1 viral shRNA and treated as in A. Graph displays mean relative expression ± SEM to the untreated. Gene expression was normalized to the house keeping gene Actin B. For all comparisons, P—*< 0.05, **< 0.005, ***< 0.0005, ****< 0.0001
Fig. 5OXPHOS inhibition blocks the platinum-induced enrichment of ALDH + cells in vivo. A 2 × 106 OVCAR3 cells were injected s.c in 6–7 weeks old NSG mice. Once the tumors were > 100 mm3, mice were randomized into three groups and treated with vehicle alone or combination of vehicle + carboplatin or IACS-010759 for 3 weeks as indicated. At the end of the study, tumors were collected, dissociated into single cells and the ALDEFLUOR assay was performed. B Tumor volumes were measured using a digital caliper through 3 weeks of treatment by the same investigator throughout the study. N = 4–5 mice per group. *P relative to carboplatin + vehicle. #P relative to vehicle. C Percentage of ALDH + cells in dissociated xenograft tumor samples using ALDEFLUOR assay. D Expression of glycolysis and OXPHOS genes in tumor xenografts. Graph indicates mean ± SEM in the different treatment groups. N = 4–5 mice per group. For all treated with vehicle alone versus carboplatin + vehicle or IACS-010759, P values *< 0.05, **< 0.005, ***< 0.0005, ****< 0.0001. E Western blot of the indicated proteins in whole cell lysates from tumor xenografts. F Model for how platinum treatment of HGSOC cells results in increased mitochondrial activity that contributes to the platinum-induced enrichment of ALDH + OCSCs. Platinum induces an increase in SIRT1 activity that increases TFAM levels, which in turn likely increases expression of OXPHOS genes that leads to an increase in mitochondrial activity