Literature DB >> 35641683

Posterior rim loading of a low-conforming tibial insert in unrestricted kinematic alignment is caused by rotational alignment of an asymmetric baseplate designed for mechanical alignment.

Maury L Hull1,2,3, Stephanie Nicolet-Petersen4, Augustine Saiz5, Connor Delman5, Stephen M Howell4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because different targets are used for internal-external rotation, an asymmetric baseplate designed for mechanical alignment may lead to under-coverage and concomitant posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment following unrestricted kinematic alignment (KA) TKA. Recognizing that such loading can lead to premature wear and/or subsidence, our aim was to determine the cause(s) so that occurrence could be remedied. Our hypothesis was that baseplate design features such as asymmetric shape when aligned in KA would consistently contribute to posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment.
METHODS: Based on analysis of fluoroscopic images of 50 patients performing dynamic, weight bearing deep knee bend and step up and of postoperative CT images, five possible causes were investigated. Causes included internal rotation of the baseplate when positioned in KA; posterior position of the lateral femoral condyle at extension; internal tibial rotation with flexion; internal rotational deviation of the baseplate from the KA rotation target; and posterior slope.
RESULTS: The incidence of posterior rim loading was 18% (9 of 50 patients). When positioned in KA, the asymmetric baseplate left 15% versus 10% of the AP depth of the lateral compartment uncovered posteriorly for posterior rim loading and non-posterior rim loading groups, respectively (p = 0.009). The lateral femoral condyle at extension was more posterior by 4 mm for the posterior rim loading group (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment was caused in part by the asymmetric design of the tibial baseplate designed for mechanical alignment which was internally rotated when positioned in KA thus under-covering a substantial percentage of the posterior lateral tibia. This highlights the need for new, asymmetric baseplates designed to maximize coverage when used in KA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanical alignment; Tibiofemoral kinematics; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement

Year:  2022        PMID: 35641683     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06994-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  3 in total

Review 1.  Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pier Francesco Indelli; Angelo Graceffa; Massimiliano Marcucci; Andrea Baldini
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

2.  The posterolateral upslope of a low-conforming insert blocks the medial pivot during a deep knee bend in TKA: a comparative analysis of two implants with different insert conformities.

Authors:  Connor M Delman; Delaney Ridenour; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Low tibial baseplate migration 1 year after unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty using a medial conforming implant design.

Authors:  Abigail E Niesen; Anna L Garverick; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.114

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.