Literature DB >> 22321064

Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification.

Valeria Hidalgo-Ruz1, Lars Gutow, Richard C Thompson, Martin Thiel.   

Abstract

This review of 68 studies compares the methodologies used for the identification and quantification of microplastics from the marine environment. Three main sampling strategies were identified: selective, volume-reduced, and bulk sampling. Most sediment samples came from sandy beaches at the high tide line, and most seawater samples were taken at the sea surface using neuston nets. Four steps were distinguished during sample processing: density separation, filtration, sieving, and visual sorting of microplastics. Visual sorting was one of the most commonly used methods for the identification of microplastics (using type, shape, degradation stage, and color as criteria). Chemical and physical characteristics (e.g., specific density) were also used. The most reliable method to identify the chemical composition of microplastics is by infrared spectroscopy. Most studies reported that plastic fragments were polyethylene and polypropylene polymers. Units commonly used for abundance estimates are "items per m(2)" for sediment and sea surface studies and "items per m(3)" for water column studies. Mesh size of sieves and filters used during sampling or sample processing influence abundance estimates. Most studies reported two main size ranges of microplastics: (i) 500 μm-5 mm, which are retained by a 500 μm sieve/net, and (ii) 1-500 μm, or fractions thereof that are retained on filters. We recommend that future programs of monitoring continue to distinguish these size fractions, but we suggest standardized sampling procedures which allow the spatiotemporal comparison of microplastic abundance across marine environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22321064     DOI: 10.1021/es2031505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  192 in total

1.  Sampling of riverine litter with citizen scientists--findings and recommendations.

Authors:  S Rech; V Macaya-Caquilpán; J F Pantoja; M M Rivadeneira; C Kroeger Campodónico; M Thiel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm-125 μm) during drinking water treatment.

Authors:  Yongli Zhang; Allison Diehl; Ashton Lewandowski; Kishore Gopalakrishnan; Tracie Baker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Patterns, dynamics and consequences of microplastic ingestion by the temperate coral, Astrangia poculata.

Authors:  Randi D Rotjan; Koty H Sharp; Anna E Gauthier; Rowan Yelton; Eliya M Baron Lopez; Jessica Carilli; Jonathan C Kagan; Juanita Urban-Rich
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The occurrence of microplastic contamination in littoral sediments of the Persian Gulf, Iran.

Authors:  Abolfazl Naji; Zinat Esmaili; Sherri A Mason; A Dick Vethaak
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Quantifying microplastic pollution on sandy beaches: the conundrum of large sample variability and spatial heterogeneity.

Authors:  Mara Fisner; Alessandra P Majer; Danilo Balthazar-Silva; Daniel Gorman; Alexander Turra
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Release of polyester and cotton fibers from textiles in machine washings.

Authors:  Markus Sillanpää; Pirjo Sainio
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Toward sustainable environmental quality: Priority research questions for Europe.

Authors:  Paul J Van den Brink; Alistair B A Boxall; Lorraine Maltby; Bryan W Brooks; Murray A Rudd; Thomas Backhaus; David Spurgeon; Violaine Verougstraete; Charmaine Ajao; Gerald T Ankley; Sabine E Apitz; Kathryn Arnold; Tomas Brodin; Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles; Jennifer Chapman; Jone Corrales; Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Teresa F Fernandes; Jerker Fick; Alex T Ford; Gemma Giménez Papiol; Ksenia J Groh; Thomas H Hutchinson; Hank Kruger; Jussi V K Kukkonen; Stefania Loutseti; Stuart Marshall; Derek Muir; Manuel E Ortiz-Santaliestra; Kai B Paul; Andreu Rico; Ismael Rodea-Palomares; Jörg Römbke; Tomas Rydberg; Helmut Segner; Mathijs Smit; Cornelis A M van Gestel; Marco Vighi; Inge Werner; Elke I Zimmer; Joke van Wensem
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Plastic debris in the open ocean.

Authors:  Andrés Cózar; Fidel Echevarría; J Ignacio González-Gordillo; Xabier Irigoien; Bárbara Ubeda; Santiago Hernández-León; Alvaro T Palma; Sandra Navarro; Juan García-de-Lomas; Andrea Ruiz; María L Fernández-de-Puelles; Carlos M Duarte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The potential of fluorescent dyes-comparative study of Nile red and three derivatives for the detection of microplastics.

Authors:  Michael T Sturm; Harald Horn; Katrin Schuhen
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.142

10.  Microplastic leachates impair behavioural vigilance and predator avoidance in a temperate intertidal gastropod.

Authors:  Laurent Seuront
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.