| Literature DB >> 35637757 |
Jingjing Luo1, Xiaoyan Hou1, Shanshan Li1, Qingying Luo1, Hejun Wu1, Guanghui Shen1, Xuequan Gu2, Xiaoyan Mo2, Zhiqing Zhang1.
Abstract
In present work, Zanthoxylum bungeanum meal (ZBM) used as experimental material, the stability of typical alkylamides (hydroxyl-α-sanshool and hydroxyl-β-sanshool) in ZBM under different acidification conditions was investigated, in order to reveal degradation or transformation mechanism of numbing substances from Z. bungeanum exposed to acid environment and its transform direction. The alkylamides content of ZBM was detected by using HPLC after different conditions of acidification. The results indicated that hydroxyl-α-sanshool and hydroxyl-β-sanshool under the concentration of hydrochloric acid is 14% decreased by 80% after only 0.5 h. Moreover, some of the components undergo isomerization and addition reactions in the process of acidification, the products of isomerization are hydroxyl-ε-sanshool and (1Z,2E,4E,8E,10E)-N-(2-hydroxy-2-methylpropyl)dodeca-2,4,8,10-tetraenimidic acid; and the product of the addition reaction is (2E,6E,8E,10E)-1-chloro-1-(2-hydroxy-2-methylpropyl)amino)dodeca-2,6,8,10-tetraen-1-ol, which indicated that acid environment has greatly changed the numbing substances in Z. bungeanum and its products.Entities:
Keywords: Acidification; Degradation mechanism; Numbing substances; Zanthoxylum bungeanum
Year: 2022 PMID: 35637757 PMCID: PMC9142844 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem X ISSN: 2590-1575
Initial numbing substance content and numbing degree of ZBM.
| Number of samples | AS1(mAU) | CS1(μg/mL) | AS2(mAU) | CS2(μg/mL) | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-1 | 90.8226 ± 0.91 | 98.47 ± 0.86 | 10.5798 ± 1.08 | 8.17 ± 1.12 | 5.13 ± 0.33 |
| A-2 | 91.0045 ± 0.53 | 98.59 ± 0.67 | 10.6902 ± 0.77 | 8.18 ± 0.89 | 5.09 ± 0.59 |
| A-3 | 90.7633 ± 1.12 | 98.56 ± 1.08 | 10.6988 ± 0.86 | 8.17 ± 1.03 | 5.44 ± 1.06 |
Note: AS1: peak area of hydroxyl-α-sanshool; CS1: content of hydroxyl-α-sanshool; AS2: peak area of hydroxyl-β-sanshool; CS2: content of hydroxyl-β-sanshool; G: numbing degree.
Influence results of different reagents on numbing substances.
| Degrade reagents | AS1(mAU) | CS1(μg/mL) | DS1(%) | AS2(mAU) | CS2(μg/mL) | DS2(%) | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NaOH | 87.8506 ± 0.66 | 95.47 ± 0.57 | 3.08 ± 0.31 | 9.3795 ± 0.94 | 7.21 ± 0.67 | 12.08 ± 0.55 | 5.03 ± 0.84 |
| H2O2 | 64.9142 ± 1.91 | 72.31 ± 0.89 | 26.59 ± 0.66 | 8.6313 ± 1.44 | 6.63 ± 0.82 | 19.13 ± 0.67 | 4.56 ± 0.61 |
| HCl | 59.8004 ± 1.21 | 67.16 ± 1.09 | 31.83 ± 0.93 | 8.411 ± 1.02 | 6.46 ± 0.78 | 21.21 ± 0.56 | 4.01 ± 0.95 |
Note: DS1: Degradation rate of hydroxyl-α-sanshool; DS2: Degradation rate of hydroxyl-β-sanshool.
Fig. 1Effect of material size (a), hydrochloric acid concentration (b), temperature (c), and time (d) on the degradation rate of numbing substances.
Orthogonal array design and result for the optimization of degrade conditions.
| NO | Factor | DS1(%) | DS2(%) | G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | ||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 62.420 ± 1.02 | 33.688 ± 0.66 | 2.31 ± 0.54 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 71.896 ± 0.55 | 36.609 ± 0.83 | 2.25 ± 1.01 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 75.160 ± 0.42 | 39.382 ± 0.71 | 2.22 ± 0.96 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 65.391 ± 0.75 | 35.054 ± 1.11 | 2.28 ± 0.43 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 70.565 ± 0.65 | 38.421 ± 1.04 | 2.26 ± 0.64 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 73.263 ± 0.37 | 40.812 ± 0.94 | 2.24 ± 1.05 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 69.046 ± 1.04 | 38.621 ± 0.56 | 2.27 ± 0.56 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 72.854 ± 1.12 | 40.915 ± 0.76 | 2.24 ± 0.72 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 75.559 ± 0.93 | 42.689 ± 0.53 | 2.21 ± 0.95 |
| DS1 | k1 | 69.825 | 65.619 | 69.512 | 69.515 | ||
| k2 | 69.739 | 71.772 | 70.949 | 71.402 | |||
| k3 | 72.486 | 74.661 | 71.59 | 71.135 | |||
| R | 2.747 | 9.042 | 2.078 | 1.887 | |||
| Primary and secondary factors:B > A > C > D optimal portfolio:A3B3C3D2 | |||||||
| DS2 | k1 | 36.560 | 35.787 | 38.472 | 38.266 | ||
| k2 | 38.096 | 38.649 | 38.117 | 38.681 | |||
| k3 | 40.742 | 40.961 | 38.808 | 38.450 | |||
| R | 4.182 | 5.174 | 0.691 | 0.414 | |||
| Primary and secondary factors:B > A > C > D optimal portfolio:A3B3C3D2 | |||||||
| G | k1 | 2.26 | 2.287 | 2.263 | 2.26 | ||
| k2 | 2.26 | 2.25 | 2.247 | 2.253 | |||
| k3 | 2.24 | 2.223 | 2.25 | 2.247 | |||
| R | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.013 | 0.013 | |||
| Primary and secondary factors:B > A > C = D optimal portfolio:A3B3C2D3 | |||||||
Fig. 2Analysis of compounds from AH1-AH5 (a) and BH1-BH5 (b) by HPLC; Effect of 14% hydrochloric acid on the chromatographic peaks of hydroxyl-α-sanshool (c) and hydroxyl-β-sanshool (d) by HPLC. The infrared fingerprints of AH5 (e) and BH5 (f).
Fig. 3The total ion chromatograms of AH5 (a); Mass spectrometry, structural formula and transformation path of peak 1 (b), peak 2 (c); peak 3 (d); peak 4 (e), peak 5 (f).
Fig. 4Diagram of transform path of sanshool exposed to acid environment.