Alan Araiza1, Melanie Duran1, Joseph Varon2. 1. United Memorial Medical Center (Araiza, Duran, Varon), Houston, Tex.; Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (Araiza), Tijuana, México; Universidad Xochicalco (Duran), Ensenada, México; The University of Houston School of Medicine (Varon), Houston, Tex. 2. United Memorial Medical Center (Araiza, Duran, Varon), Houston, Tex.; Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (Araiza), Tijuana, México; Universidad Xochicalco (Duran), Ensenada, México; The University of Houston School of Medicine (Varon), Houston, Tex. jvaron@uh.edu.
Early administration of vasopressors in patients with septic shock improves patient outcomes
Despite advancements in sepsis management, mortality rates remain high. In 2011, 1 in 18 deaths in Canada involved sepsis.1 Delays in achieving adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP) are associated with increased mortality.2 Therefore, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline recommends prioritizing treatment of low MAP through vasopressors given peripherally, rather than waiting for placement of a central venous catheter.3
When central venous access cannot be established delivering vasopressors via peripheral catheters is acceptable
Administration of vasopressors through peripheral venous catheters has traditionally been avoided given concerns of extravasation, limb ischemia and tissue necrosis.4 However, placement of central venous catheters requires special training, can be time consuming and can delay vasopressor initiation. In addition, central line insertion and maintenance can cause complications like pneumothorax (2.1%), catheter-related bloodstream infection (0.5%–1.4%) or deep vein thrombosis (0.5%–1.4%).5
Extravasation injury from vasopressors given through a peripheral catheter is uncommon
A meta-analysis of 16 055 patients treated with peripherally administered vasopressors reported an incidence of adverse events (i.e., extravasation, limb ischemia and necrosis) of 1.8% (95% confidence interval 0.1%–4.8%). The incidence did not differ significantly according to vasopressor type, or catheter location or gauge.5 Since 1 study found that extravasation was more likely with catheters placed below the antecubital fossa, placing the peripheral catheter as proximally as possible seems appropriate.4 Most extravasation events happened 6–50 hours after the infusion was started. Serious complications were uncommon even when extravasation occurred.4,5
Risks of extravasation can be minimized with a few simple steps
If extravasation occurs, clinicians should stop the infusion immediately but not remove the catheter. While the vasopressor infusion is restarted through a new access site, the drug should be aspirated through the original catheter. The catheter can then be removed while aspiration is taking place. Phentolamine should be injected subcutaneously along the edges of the extravasation area. Surgical evaluation should be considered.4,5
Institutional protocols should be considered when using peripheral vasopressors
Institutional protocols may contribute to the low incidence of complications. We propose an algorithm for clinical monitoring and management of extravasation in adult patients based on the limited published data and our clinical experience (Appendix 1, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.211966/tab-related-content).4,5
Authors: Laura Evans; Andrew Rhodes; Waleed Alhazzani; Massimo Antonelli; Craig M Coopersmith; Craig French; Flávia R Machado; Lauralyn Mcintyre; Marlies Ostermann; Hallie C Prescott; Christa Schorr; Steven Simpson; W Joost Wiersinga; Fayez Alshamsi; Derek C Angus; Yaseen Arabi; Luciano Azevedo; Richard Beale; Gregory Beilman; Emilie Belley-Cote; Lisa Burry; Maurizio Cecconi; John Centofanti; Angel Coz Yataco; Jan De Waele; R Phillip Dellinger; Kent Doi; Bin Du; Elisa Estenssoro; Ricard Ferrer; Charles Gomersall; Carol Hodgson; Morten Hylander Møller; Theodore Iwashyna; Shevin Jacob; Ruth Kleinpell; Michael Klompas; Younsuck Koh; Anand Kumar; Arthur Kwizera; Suzana Lobo; Henry Masur; Steven McGloughlin; Sangeeta Mehta; Yatin Mehta; Mervyn Mer; Mark Nunnally; Simon Oczkowski; Tiffany Osborn; Elizabeth Papathanassoglou; Anders Perner; Michael Puskarich; Jason Roberts; William Schweickert; Maureen Seckel; Jonathan Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Tobias Welte; Janice Zimmerman; Mitchell Levy Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-10-02 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Deirdre A Hennessy; Andrea Soo; Daniel J Niven; Rachel J Jolley; Juan Posadas-Calleja; Henry T Stelfox; Christopher J Doig Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Victoria S Owen; Brianna K Rosgen; Stephana J Cherak; Andre Ferland; Henry T Stelfox; Kirsten M Fiest; Daniel J Niven Journal: Crit Care Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 9.097