Literature DB >> 3563556

Informed consent: the physicians' perspective.

K M Taylor, M Kelner.   

Abstract

Using the current controversy in breast cancer treatment as a model, this paper reports on physicians' attitudes and behavior in the use of informed consent. Findings are based on a survey of 170 oncologists from eight countries and representing three medical specialties. Physician responses indicate that they regarded informed consent as an intrusion into the doctor-patient relationship. Problems identified by the physicians included: decreasingly effective doctor-patient communication; less personalized relationships with patients and curtailed freedom with regard to disclosure procedures. They also viewed the informed consent regulation as having a negative impact on their patient care. The constraints of obtaining informed consent reduced physicians' willingness to participate in scientific experiments. The consent form was seen to highlight their dual role as care-giver and scientific investigator, making them uncomfortable in dealing with patients. These findings demonstrate the ways in which legal restrictions associated with the introduction of new technologies critically affect the practice of medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3563556     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90246-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  14 in total

1.  Difficulties in obtaining informed consent by psychiatrists, surgeons and obstetricians/gynaecologists.

Authors:  G Kent
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-02

2.  Designing clinical protocols for optimal use: measuring attributes of treatment and cancer control trials.

Authors:  J E Veney; W P Kory; J M Barnsley; A D Kaluzny
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Is there a role for preference assessments in research on quality of life in oncology?

Authors:  J E Till; H J Sutherland; E M Meslin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  S J Edwards; R J Lilford; J Hewison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

5.  Adherence to informed consent standards in Shiraz hospitals: matrons' perspective.

Authors:  Alireza Mohsenian Sisakht; Najme Karamzade Ziarati; Farideh Kouchak; Mehrdad Askarian
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-10-26

6.  American oncology and the discourse on hope.

Authors:  M J Delvecchio Good; B J Good; C Schaffer; S E Lind
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1990-03

7.  How informed is signed consent?

Authors:  D J Byrne; A Napier; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-19

8.  Informing patients about clinical trials.

Authors:  B J Oddens; A Algra; J van Gijn
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1993-07

Review 9.  Integrating clinical and research psychiatry.

Authors:  J M de Groot; S H Kennedy
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.186

10.  Informed consent in clinical research with drugs in Spain: perspective of clinical trials committee members.

Authors:  R Dal-Ré
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.