Jinhong Jung1, Ji Hyeon Joo1, So Yeon Kim2, Jin Hyoung Kim2, Jonggi Choi3, Danbi Lee3, Ju Hyun Shim3, Kang Mo Kim3, Young-Suk Lim3, Han Chu Lee3, Jin-Hong Park1, Sang Min Yoon1. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Introduction: We evaluated the radiologic response rate of combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiotherapy (RT) in treatment-naïve patients with liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) and analyzed its clinical importance in overall survival (OS) outcomes. Methods: Patients who were treated with TACE plus RT as a first-line treatment for HCC with MVI between January 2010 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiologic response was assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) at 2 and 4 months after completion of RT. Landmark analysis at 2 and 4 months, and time-dependent Cox regression analysis using response as a time-dependent covariate were performed for univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: The 2-month landmark analysis included 427 patients, and the 4-month landmark analysis included 355 patients after excluding patients without imaging studies for response evaluation at 4 months. Radiologic responses were observed in 210 (49.2%) patients at 2 months and 181 (51.8%) patients at 4 months. In multivariable analyses, radiologic response was identified as an independent prognosticator for OS at 2 months (median OS: responders, 23.1 months vs. nonresponders, 8.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 3.194; p < 0.001) and 4 months (median OS: responders, 26.5 months vs. nonresponders, 9.3 months; HR, 4.534; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Radiologic response assessed by mRECIST was a significant prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced-stage HCC showing MVI treated with combined TACE plus RT.
Introduction: We evaluated the radiologic response rate of combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiotherapy (RT) in treatment-naïve patients with liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) and analyzed its clinical importance in overall survival (OS) outcomes. Methods: Patients who were treated with TACE plus RT as a first-line treatment for HCC with MVI between January 2010 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiologic response was assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) at 2 and 4 months after completion of RT. Landmark analysis at 2 and 4 months, and time-dependent Cox regression analysis using response as a time-dependent covariate were performed for univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: The 2-month landmark analysis included 427 patients, and the 4-month landmark analysis included 355 patients after excluding patients without imaging studies for response evaluation at 4 months. Radiologic responses were observed in 210 (49.2%) patients at 2 months and 181 (51.8%) patients at 4 months. In multivariable analyses, radiologic response was identified as an independent prognosticator for OS at 2 months (median OS: responders, 23.1 months vs. nonresponders, 8.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 3.194; p < 0.001) and 4 months (median OS: responders, 26.5 months vs. nonresponders, 9.3 months; HR, 4.534; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Radiologic response assessed by mRECIST was a significant prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced-stage HCC showing MVI treated with combined TACE plus RT.
Authors: Jorge A Marrero; Laura M Kulik; Claude B Sirlin; Andrew X Zhu; Richard S Finn; Michael M Abecassis; Lewis R Roberts; Julie K Heimbach Journal: Hepatology Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Richard S Finn; Shukui Qin; Masafumi Ikeda; Peter R Galle; Michel Ducreux; Tae-You Kim; Masatoshi Kudo; Valeriy Breder; Philippe Merle; Ahmed O Kaseb; Daneng Li; Wendy Verret; Derek-Zhen Xu; Sairy Hernandez; Juan Liu; Chen Huang; Sohail Mulla; Yulei Wang; Ho Yeong Lim; Andrew X Zhu; Ann-Lii Cheng Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yeon Joo Kim; Jinhong Jung; Ji Hyeon Joo; So Yeon Kim; Jin Hyoung Kim; Young-Suk Lim; Han Chu Lee; Jong Hoon Kim; Sang Min Yoon Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2019-09-07 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Hee Ho Chu; Jin Hyoung Kim; Ju Hyun Shim; Sang Min Yoon; Pyeong Hwa Kim; Ibrahim Alrashidi Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 6.639