| Literature DB >> 35632242 |
Atta-Ur Rahman1, Abdullah Alqahtani2, Nahier Aldhafferi2, Muhammad Umar Nasir3, Muhammad Farhan Khan4, Muhammad Adnan Khan5, Amir Mosavi6,7,8.
Abstract
Oral cancer is a dangerous and extensive cancer with a high death ratio. Oral cancer is the most usual cancer in the world, with more than 300,335 deaths every year. The cancerous tumor appears in the neck, oral glands, face, and mouth. To overcome this dangerous cancer, there are many ways to detect like a biopsy, in which small chunks of tissues are taken from the mouth and tested under a secure and hygienic microscope. However, microscope results of tissues to detect oral cancer are not up to the mark, a microscope cannot easily identify the cancerous cells and normal cells. Detection of cancerous cells using microscopic biopsy images helps in allaying and predicting the issues and gives better results if biologically approaches apply accurately for the prediction of cancerous cells, but during the physical examinations microscopic biopsy images for cancer detection there are major chances for human error and mistake. So, with the development of technology deep learning algorithms plays a major role in medical image diagnosing. Deep learning algorithms are efficiently developed to predict breast cancer, oral cancer, lung cancer, or any other type of medical image. In this study, the proposed model of transfer learning model using AlexNet in the convolutional neural network to extract rank features from oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) biopsy images to train the model. Simulation results have shown that the proposed model achieved higher classification accuracy 97.66% and 90.06% of training and testing, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: AlexNet; angiogenic; artificial intelligence; machine learning; malignant; medical imaging; neural network; oral cancer; oral squamous cell carcinoma; transfer learning
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35632242 PMCID: PMC9146317 DOI: 10.3390/s22103833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Compare and weaknesses of previous studies.
| Publication | Method | Dataset | Accuracy | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A.Alhazmi [ | ANN | Public | 78.95% | Requires data preprocessing |
| C.S. Chu [ | SVM, KNN | Public | 70.59% | Requires data preprocessing |
| R.A.Welikala [ | ResNet101 | Public | 78.30% | Requires data preprocessing and learning criteria decision method |
| V. Shavlokhova [ | CNN | Private | 77.89% | Requires better image data preprocessing techniques and learning criteria method |
| M. Aberville [ | Deep Learning | Public | 80.01% | Requires data image preprocessing techniquesClass instances |
| H. Alkhadar [ | KNN, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest | Public | 76% | Requires handcrafted features |
Figure 1Proposed model of oral cancer prediction empowered with transfer learning.
Pseudocode of the proposed model for oral cancer prediction.
| 1 | Start |
| 2 | Input Oral Cancer Data from Data Cloud |
| 3 | Pre-process Oral Cancer data |
| 4 | Load Data |
| 5 | Load Customized Model |
| 6 | Prediction of Oral Cancer using Transfer Learning (AlexNet) |
| 7 | Training Phase |
| 8 | Image Testing Phase |
| 9 | Compute the Performance and Accuracy of the proposed model by using the Performance Matrix |
| 10 | Finish |
OSCC biopsy dataset instances.
| Classes | No. of Images |
|---|---|
| Sick (OSCC) | 2511 |
| Healthy | 2435 |
Figure 2Sick and healthy oral squamous cell carcinoma biopsy dataset.
Figure 3Pre-processed (227 × 227) oral squamous cell carcinoma biopsy images.
Figure 4Customized AlexNet for oral cancer prediction using transfer learning.
Proposed model training simulation parameters.
| No. of Epochs | Learning Rate | No. of Layers | Image Dimension | Pooling Method | Mini-Batch Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.001 | 25 | 227 × 227 × 3 | MAX | 2.5674 |
|
| 2.3498 | ||||
|
| 1.3600 | ||||
|
| 1.4948 | ||||
|
| 6.1029 | ||||
|
| 0.2491 | ||||
|
| 0.3736 |
Proposed model training simulation accuracies.
| No. of Epochs | Learning Rate | Accuracy (%) | Loss Rate (%) | Iterations | Time Elapsed (hh:mm:ss) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0.001 | 76.12 | 23.88 | 38 per | 00:03:15 |
| 20 | 80.35 | 19.65 | 00:03:45 | ||
| 30 | 86.15 | 13.85 | 00:04:34 | ||
| 40 | 90.62 | 9.38 | 00:04:55 | ||
| 50 | 85.94 | 14.06 | 00:06:11 | ||
| 60 | 94.44 | 5.56 | 00:07:17 | ||
| 70 | 97.66 | 2.34 | 00:08:34 |
Figure 5The proposed model predicted results of oral cancer during validation.
Figure 6Proposed model of oral cancer prediction accuracy and loss with respect to iteration during training.
Figure 7Proposed model testing confusion matrix.
Proposed model performance parameter results using transfer learning.
| Instances (1483) | Testing (%) |
|---|---|
|
| 90.02 |
|
| 9.08 |
|
| 92.74 |
|
| 87.38 |
|
| 90.15 |
|
| 87.69 |
|
| 92.55 |
|
| 12.62 |
|
| 7.26 |
|
| 7.35 |
|
| 0.08 |
|
| 90.18 |
Comparative analysis with previous research.
| Work | Preprocessing Layer | Models | Classification Accuracy | Miss-Classification Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A.Alhazmi [ | No | ANN | 78.95% | 21.05% |
| C.S. Chu [ | No | SVM, KNN | 70.59% | 29.41% |
| R.A.Welikala [ | No | ResNet101 | 78.30% | 21.70% |
|
| Yes | Transfer Learning (AlexNet) | 90.06% | 9.94% |