| Literature DB >> 35631990 |
Shivam Panwar1, Narender Raju Panjagari1, Ashish Kumar Singh1, Gaurav Kr Deshwal1, Richa Badola1, Prashant Saurabh Minz2, Gulden Goksen3, Alexandru Rusu4,5, Monica Trif6.
Abstract
Pack integrity is essential for the success of modified atmosphere packaging of food products. Colorimetric oxygen leak indicators or tags are simple and smart tools that can depict the presence or absence of oxygen within a package. However, not many bio-based electrospun materials were explored for this purpose. Ultraviolet light-activated kappa-carrageenan-based smart oxygen indicating tag was developed using the electrospinning technique in this study and its stability during storage was determined. Kappa-carrageenan was used with redox dye, sacrificial electron donor, photocatalyst, and solvent for preparing oxygen indicating electrospun tag. Parameters of electrospinning namely flow rate of the polymer solution, the distance between spinneret and collector, and voltage applied were optimized using Taguchi L9 orthogonal design. Rheological and microstructural studies revealed that the electrospinning solution was pseudoplastic and the mat fibers were compact and non-woven with an average fiber size of 1-2 microns. Oxygen sensitivity at different oxygen concentrations revealed that the tag was sensitive enough to detect as low as 0.4% oxygen. The developed tag was stable for at least 60 days when stored in dark at 25 °C and 65% RH. The developed mat could be highly useful in modified atmosphere packaging applications to check seal integrity in oxygen devoid packages.Entities:
Keywords: Taguchi; carrageenan; electrospun; intelligent packaging; oxygen indicator; stability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35631990 PMCID: PMC9143945 DOI: 10.3390/polym14102108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Experimental design for the selected factors with their levels and the visual appearance of the electrospun tags as affected by UV-light treatment and later exposure to ambient air.
Figure 2Rheological models of kappa-carrageenan-based electrospinning solution. (A): Apparent viscosity of electrospinning solution at three temperatures; (B): Fitting of mathematical models to describe the flow behavior of electrospinning solutions at three temperatures.
Effects of different electrospinning process conditions on the instrumental color values of the tag.
| Treatment | Lightness | Redness | Blueness |
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| A1B1C1 | 16.00 ± 0.77 bA | 15.74 ± 1.05 cdA | 15.93 ± 0.79 bcA | 5.65 ± 1.14 dA | 10.68 ± 1.24 abB | 5.06 ± 1.38 bcA | −16.23 ± 0.99 abA | −15.94 ± 0.52 aA | −14.26 ± 0.82 aB | 2.71 ± 0.60 abA | 5.08 ± 0.24 aB |
| A1B2C2 | 12.13 ± 0.78 aAB | 11.64 ± 0.90 aA | 13.38 ± 0.41 aB | 4.44 ± 0.82 dA | 10.03 ± 0.97 abB | 5.26 ± 0.34 bcA | −16.56 ± 1.26 abA | −15.79 ± 1.08 aA | −15.06 ± 0.28 aA | 2.53 ± 0.32 aA | 5.89 ± 0.79 abB |
| A1B3C3 | 16.00 ± 0.73 bA | 14.85 ± 0.80 bcA | 16.44 ± 0.93 bcA | 4.71 ± 0.81 dA | 10.79 ± 0.49 abB | 5.21 ± 0.66 bcA | −14.79 ± 1.09 bcA | −14.74 ± 1.02 abA | −10.35 ± 0.85 bB | 4.69 ± 0.79 cA | 6.24 ± 0.55 abB |
| A2B1C2 | 16.54 ± 0.96 bA | 18.50 ± 0.88 eB | 18.82 ± 1.00 dB | 3.29 ± 0.40 bcA | 8.91 ± 0.91 aB | 4.15 ± 0.72 abcA | −13.53 ± 0.99 cA | −12.41 ± 1.68 cA | −11.12 ± 0.72 bA | 3.76 ± 0.35 abcA | 6.14 ± 0.80 ab |
| A2B2C3 | 13.38 ± 0.52 aA | 13.19 ± 0.95 abA | 14.68 ± 1.23 abA | 4.82 ± 0.97 dA | 11.73 ± 0.83 bB | 5.5 ± 1.31 cA | −15.73 ± 0.97 abAB | −16.29 ± 0.84 aA | −14.32 ± 0.95 aB | 2.54 ± 0.73 aA | 7.02 ± 0.28 bB |
| A2B3C1 | 13.77 ± 0.88 aA | 14.78 ± 0.94 bcA | 16.57 ± 0.62 cB | 5.32 ± 0.72 dA | 10.06 ± 2.07 abB | 5.18 ± 0.84 bcA | −17.12 ± 1.21 aA | −15.53 ± 1.10 aAB | −13.5 ± 0.67 aA | 4.62 ± 0.46 cA | 5.23 ± 0.99 aA |
| A3B1C3 | 17.08 ± 0.94 bA | 18.38 ± 1.31 eAB | 20.02 ± 1.57 dB | 5.24 ± 0.78 dA | 11.09 ± 1.64 abB | 3.82 ± 0.36 abA | −16.5 ± 0.76 abA | −13.35 ± 1.21 bcB | −10.09 ± 1.74 bC | 7.47 ± 1.42 dA | 6.97 ± 1.00 bA |
| A3B2C1 | 18.90 ± 1.71 cA | 17.33 ± 1.15 deA | 19.09 ± 1.38 dA | 1.85 ± 0.34 aA | 10.18 ± 0.92 abB | 3.21 ± 0.85 aA | −15.77 ± 0.83 abAB | −16.53 ± 0.70 aA | −14.29 ± 1.42 aB | 3.17 ± 1.10 abA | 8.53 ± 0.61 cB |
| A3B3C2 | 19.78 ± 0.91 cA | 18.82 ± 1.10 eA | 18.35 ± 0.36 dA | 2.47 ± 0.6 abA | 11.91 ± 1.20 bB | 5.56 ± 0.67 cA | −17.03 ± 1.38 aA | −15.91 ± 0.82 aA | −15.09 ± 0.55 aA | 4.14 ± 0.44 bcA | 9.70 ± 0.53 cB |
L: Lightness value of original mat; L: Lightness value of photoactivated mat; L: Lightness value of recovered mat, a: Redness to greenness value of original mat; a: Redness to greenness value of photoactivated mat; a: Redness to greenness value of recovered mat; b: Yellowness to blueness value of original mat; b: Yellowness to blueness value of photoactivated mat; b: Yellowness to blueness value or recovered mat; ∆E: Total color difference value between recovered and original mats; ∆E: Total color difference value between photoactivated and original mats. ABC Meanvalues within a color attribute (row) with at least one similar superscript do not differ significantly (p > 0.05); abcde Mean values within a column with at least one similar superscript do not differ significantly (p > 0.05).
Figure 3Effects of electrospinning process variables on total color difference (∆E) values of the electrospun tags. ((A): ∆E; (B): ∆E; subscripts: o-original; p-photo-activated; r-recovered).
Figure 4Microstructure and appearance of electrospun tag as affected by ultraviolet light activation: (A) microstructure; (B) original, photo-activated, and recovered tags.
Moisture sorption models of electrospun tags and their calculated values.
| Model | Parameter | Estimated Values | Model | Parameter | Estimated Values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 7.37 | Peleg |
| 112.39 |
|
| 2.43 |
| 23.09 | ||
|
| 0.9979 |
| 6.96 | ||
|
|
|
| 1.24 | ||
|
|
|
| 0.9859 | ||
|
| 4.82 | ||||
|
| 11.20 | ||||
| GAB |
| 0.74 | D’Arcy & Watt |
| 2.81 × 10−6 |
|
| 2.13 |
| −228.30 | ||
|
| 9.84 |
| −5.19 | ||
|
| 0.9896 |
| 0.92 | ||
|
| 8.51 |
| 15.88 | ||
|
| 6.82 |
| 0.9844 | ||
|
| 16.60 |
| 7.07 | ||
|
| 17.75 | ||||
|
|
| 1.20 |
|
| −0.489 |
|
| 3.49 |
| −7.19 | ||
|
| 0.58 |
| 19.69 | ||
|
|
|
| 17.31 | ||
|
|
|
| 6.61 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
R = Coefficient of determination, P = Percent mean deviation error, RMS% = Root mean square error percent (values highlighted in bold are the best-fit models).
Figure 5The moisture sorption isotherm of the kappa-carrageenan-based electrospun oxygen-indicating tag (CG-EOIT) and best-fit model (residuals pattern is presented in inset).
Figure 6Storage stability of the kappa-carrageenan-based electrospun oxygen-indicating tag. (A) Images of the oxygen indicating tags stored under different conditions with their visual appearances; (B) The changes in total color difference values of oxygen indicating tags during storage.