| Literature DB >> 35631664 |
Yun Shin Chu1, Pei-Chun Wong2,3,4, Jason Shian-Ching Jang5,6, Chih-Hwa Chen7,8,9,10, Si-Han Wu11,12.
Abstract
Mg-Zn-Ca bulk metallic glass (BMG) is a promising orthopedic fixation implant because of its biodegradable and biocompatible properties. Structural supporting bone implants with osteoinduction properties for effective bone regeneration have been highly desired in recent years. Osteogenic growth peptide (OGP) can increase the proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and enhance the mineralization of osteoblast cells. However, the short half-life and non-specificity to target areas limit applications of OGP. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) as nanocarriers possess excellent properties, such as easy surface modification, superior targeting efficiency, and high loading capacity of drugs or proteins. Accordingly, we propose a system of combining the OGP-containing MSNs with Mg-Zn-Ca BMG materials to promote bone regeneration. In this work, we conjugated cysteine-containing OGP (cgOGP, 16 a.a.) to interior walls of channels in MSNs and maintained the dispersity of MSNs via PEGylation. An in vitro study showed that metal ions released from Mg-Zn-Ca BMG promoted cell proliferation and migration and elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineralization. On treating cells with both BMG ion-containing Minimum Essential Medium Eagle-alpha modification (α-MEM) and OGP-conjugated MSNs, enhanced focal adhesion turnover and promoted differentiation were observed. Hematological analyses showed the biocompatible nature of this BMG/nanocomposite system. In addition, in vivo micro-computed tomographic and histological observations revealed that our system stimulated osteogenesis and new bone formation around the implant site.Entities:
Keywords: Mg–Zn–Ca bulk metallic glass; bone tissue engineering; mesoporous silica nanoparticles; osseointegration; osteoconduction; osteogenic differentiation; osteogenic growth peptide; osteoinduction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35631664 PMCID: PMC9145403 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14051078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.525
Figure 1(a) Schematic illustration of Mg−Zn−Ca bulk metallic glass combined with mesoporous silica nanoparticle@PEG/PEI-osteogenic growth peptide for promoting bone regeneration in the tunnel. (b) Compressive strength measurement of Mg66Zn29Ca5 BMG. (c) Time−dependent degradation behavior of Mg66Zn29Ca5 BMG immersed in Hank’s solution. (d) Cell viability of MC3T3−E1 treated with different concentrations of extracted−αMEM. (n = 3 per group; data are the mean ± standard deviation, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). The circle represents the pH-value (right y-axis), and the triangle refers to the weight change (left y-axis) determined at each corresponding immersion time (x-axis).
Chemical composition of Mg66Zn29Ca5 bulk metallic glass and metal ions measurements in αMEM and extracted-αMEM (mean ± standard deviation).
| Mg | Zn | Ca | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 24.305 | 65.38 | 40.078 | |
|
| Design | 66 | 29 | 5 |
| Result | 65.81 ± 0.44 | 28.69 ± 0.35 | 5.50 ± 0.34 | |
|
| αMEM | 0.79 | 0.02 | 0.33 |
| 100% extracted-αMEM | 60.26 | 8.08 | 7.05 | |
| Released metal ions | 59.47 | 8.06 | 6.72 | |
|
| 89.37 | 4.50 | 6.12 | |
Figure 2(a) TEM image and (b) particle size distributions of MSN@PEG/PEI. (c) DLS analyses of MSN@PEG/PEI and MSN@PEG/PEI−OGP in PBS. (d) Zeta potential measurements of MSN@PEG/PEI over pH ranging from 6 to 12. (e) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and (f) pore size distribution of MSN@PEG/PEI. (g) Cell viability of MC3T3−E1 treated with different concentrations of MSN@PEG/PEI. (h) Fluorescence images of MC3T3−E1 cells at 24 h post−treatment.
Figure 3(a) Experimental design for cell migration/invasion study. (b) Scratch migration (wound healing) assay and (c) quantitative evaluation of MC3T3−E1 cells conducted immediately after treatment (IAT) of the conditioned media. (d) Transwell invasion assay and (e) quantitative evaluation of MC3T3−E1 cells conducted delayed after treatment (DAT) after treatment of the conditioned media. (f) Western blotting of phosphorylated (p)−focal adhesion kinase (FAK) (Tyr397), p−paxillin (Tyr118), p−extracellular signal−regulated kinase (ERK) (42/44), and α−tubulin expressions in MC3T3−E1 cells at 24 h post−treatment. The amount of nanoparticles was 100 μg/mL, and that of OGP was 6.06 μg/mL. (n = 3 per group). (Data are the mean ± standard deviation, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001).
Figure 4(a) Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of induced−MC3T3-E1 cells under different conditions after 14 days of culture. (b) Quantitative assay for ALP activity. (c) Alizarin red s (ARS) staining of induced-MC3T3−E1 cells after 21 days of culture. (d) Quantitative assay for ARS staining. (e) Micro−CT image of a distal rabbit femur at 4 weeks post−surgery. (f) Quantitative assay for the bone mineral density of distal rabbit femurs surrounding the implant site at 4 weeks post−surgery. (g) H&E staining and Masson’s trichrome staining of tissues surrounding the implant site. ob, osteoblasts; oc, osteocytes. Type I collagen was stained blue and mature bone was stained red. The concentration of nanoparticles was 100 μg/mL. (n = 3 per group). (Data are the mean ± standard deviation, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).