| Literature DB >> 35631386 |
Turki Al Hagbani1, Bhavya Vishwa2, Amr S Abu Lila1,3, Hadil Faris Alotaibi4, El-Sayed Khafagy5,6, Afrasim Moin1, Devegowda V Gowda2.
Abstract
The objective of the current study was to develop poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres loaded with the anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) fluoroquinolone, Levofloxacin (LVX), in the form of dry powder inhalation (DPI). LVX-loaded microspheres were fabricated by solvent evaporation technique. Central Composite Design (CCD) was adopted to optimize the microspheres, with desired particle size, drug loading, and drug entrapment efficiency, for targeting alveolar macrophages via non-invasive pulmonary delivery. Structural characterization studies by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction analysis revealed the absence of any possible chemical interaction between the drug and the polymer used for the preparation of microspheres. In addition, the optimized drug-loaded microspheres exhibited desired average aerodynamic diameter of 2.13 ± 1.24 μm and fine particle fraction of 75.35 ± 1.42%, indicating good aerosolization properties. In vivo data demonstrated that LVX-loaded microspheres had superior lung accumulation, as evident by a two-fold increase in the area under the curve AUC0-24h, as compared with plain LVX. Furthermore, LVX-loaded microspheres prolonged drug residence time in the lung and maintained a relatively high drug concentration for a longer time, which contributed to a reduced leakage in the systemic circulation. In conclusion, inhalable LVX-loaded microspheres might represent a plausible delivery vehicle for targeting pulmonary tuberculosis via enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of LVX while minimizing its systemic off-target side effects.Entities:
Keywords: inhalable microspheres; levofloxacin; lung targeting; pulmonary drug delivery; tuberculosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35631386 PMCID: PMC9145307 DOI: 10.3390/ph15050560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Experimental design matrix of the central composite design with experimental results.
| Formula | Coded | Actual Values of | Responses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X1 | X2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | |
| MS1 | 1.414 | 0 | 11.03 | 7.5 | 3.8 ± 0.45 | 32.9 ± 2.1 | 64.87 ± 4.8 |
| MS2 | 0 | 1.414 | 7.5 | 11.03 | 3.2 ± 0.37 | 41.98 ± 3.2 | 71.87 ± 6.5 |
| MS3 | +1 | +1 | 10 | 10 | 2.9 ± 0.31 | 39.97 ± 2.9 | 75.98 ± 6.3 |
| MS4 | −1 | −1 | 5 | 5 | 2.9 ± 0.30 | 39.09 ± 2.7 | 73.27 ± 5.9 |
| MS5 | 0 | −1.414 | 7.5 | 3.96 | 4.2 ± 0.29 | 36.98 ± 2.5 | 76.59 ± 6.2 |
| MS6 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 2.9 ± 0.19 | 38.87 ± 3.1 | 78.25 ± 6.1 |
| MS7 | −1 | +1 | 5 | 10 | 2.4 ± 0.17 | 42.03 ± 2.9 | 74.78 ± 5.8 |
| MS8 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 2.9 ± 0.20 | 39.09 ± 2.6 | 80.06 ± 6.8 |
| MS9 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 2.8 ± 0.19 | 39.65 ± 2.6 | 79.98 ± 6.5 |
| MS10 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 2.9 ± 0.19 | 38.93 ± 2.4 | 81.26 ± 5.9 |
| MS11 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 3.1 ± 0.21 | 38.76 ± 3.5 | 80.01 ± 5.7 |
| MS12 | −1.414 | 0 | 3.96 | 7.5 | 3.2 ± 0.18 | 34.09 ± 1.8 | 60.87 ± 4.7 |
| MS13 | +1 | −1 | 10 | 5 | 3.6 ± 0.22 | 31.09 ± 1.9 | 69.65 ± 4.5 |
X1: levofloxacin concentration; X2: PLGA concentration; Y1: particle size; Y2: percentage drug loading; and Y3: percentage entrapment efficiency.
Figure 1(A) Contour plot of particle size (Y1); (B) 3D surface plot for Y1; (C) Contour plot of drug loading (Y2); (D) 3D surface plot for Y2; (E) Contour plot of entrapment efficiency (Y3); and (F) 3D surface plot for Y3.
Figure 2Surface morphology of the optimized formula of LVX-loaded microspheres.
Micromeritic properties of free LVX and optimized LVX-loaded microspheres.
| Parameters | Pure LVX | LVX-Loaded Microspheres |
|---|---|---|
| Bulk Density | 0.22 ± 0.02 g/cm3 | 0.39 ± 0.06 g/cm3 |
| Tapped Density | 0.31 ± 0.01 g/cm3 | 0.48 ± 0.08 g/cm3 |
| Carr’s Index | 29.03 | 18.75 |
| Hausner’s ratio | 1.41 | 1.23 |
| Angle of Repose (θ) | 42 ± 2° | 29 ± 1° |
Aerodynamic parameters of free LVX and optimized LVX-loaded microspheres.
| Parameters | Pure LVX | LVX-Loaded Microspheres |
|---|---|---|
| Recovered dose (RD (µg)) | 99.05 ± 0.99 | 91.76 ± 1.54 |
| Emitted dose (ED (µg)) | 82.34 ± 1.99 | 83.12 ± 2.18 |
| Fine particle dose (FPD (µg)) | 51.87 ± 1.23 | 67.98 ± 1.54 |
| Fine particle fraction (FPF (%)) | 53.70 ± 1.76 | 75.35 ± 1.42 |
| Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD (µm)) | 4.24± 1.37 | 2.13 ± 1.24 |
| Geometric standard deviation (GSD) | 2.38 ± 1.09 | 3.61 ± 0.87 |
Data represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 3(A) DSC thermograms; (B) X-ray diffractograms; (C) FTIR spectra Pure LVX, PLGA polymer, and LVX-loaded microspheres.
Figure 4In vitro release of free LVX and LVX-loaded microspheres in (A) Acetate buffer (pH 4.4) and (B) Phosphate buffer (pH 7.4).
Figure 5In vitro cell viability of A549 human alveolar basal epithelial cells upon treatment with LVX-loaded PLGA microspheres.
Stability study of LVX-loaded microspheres upon long-term storage at different storage conditions.
| Stability | Time | Drug | Particle | Entrapment Efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 ± 1 °C | Initial | 40.85 ± 2.09 | 2.86 ± 0.26 | 77.80 ± 1.98 |
| 2 weeks | 40.93 ± 2.13 | 2.87 ± 0.21 | 77.45 ± 1.56 | |
| 1 month | 40.68 ± 1.98 | 2.89 ± 0.24 | 77.76 ± 1.83 | |
| 2 months | 40.81 ± 1.09 | 2.93 ± 0.29 | 77.79 ± 1.11 | |
| 3 months | 40.34 ± 1.11 | 2.96 ± 0.26 | 77.82 ± 1.35 | |
| 6 months | 40.69 ± 2.01 | 2.99 ± 0.29 | 77.59 ± 1.55 | |
| 25 ± 2 °C | Initial | 40.85 ± 1.10 | 2.86 ± 0.26 | 77.80 ± 1.86 |
| 2 weeks | 40.67 ± 0.99 | 2.89 ± 0.21 | 77.91 ± 2.01 | |
| 1 month | 40.09 ± 1.56 | 2.91 ± 0.24 | 77.39 ± 1.72 | |
| 2 months | 40.63 ± 2.04 | 2.95 ± 0.29 | 77.69 ± 1.20 | |
| 3 months | 40.77 ± 1.87 | 2.97 ± 0.26 | 77.79 ± 1.71 | |
| 6 months | 40.81 ± 1.43 | 3.01 ± 0.29 | 77.81 ± 1.84 | |
| 40 ± 2 °C | Initial | 40.85 ± 1.25 | 2.86 ± 0.26 | 77.80 ± 1.77 |
| 2 weeks | 39.97 ± 1.22 | 2.90 ± 0.31 | 77.79 ± 2.00 | |
| 1 month | 39.09 ± 1.89 | 2.92 ± 0.28 | 77.32 ± 2.14 | |
| 2 months | 38.12 ± 1.59 | 2.98 ± 0.30 | 76.97 ± 0.99 | |
| 3 months | 37.64 ± 1.45 | 3.01 ± 0.22 | 76.01 ± 1.54 | |
| 6 months | 33.87 ± 1.37 | 3.03 ± 0.34 | 73.89 ± 1.64 |
Data represents mean ± SD of three independent determinations.
Figure 6Mean drug concentration-time profile of plain LVX and LVX-loaded microspheres in (A) plasma and (B) lung following pulmonary inhalation.
Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters of plain LVX and LVX-loaded microspheres following pulmonary administration.
| Pharmacokinetic Parameters | Plasma | Lung | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plain LVX | LVX-Loaded Microspheres | Plain LVX | LVX-Loaded Microspheres | |
| Cmax (μg/mL) | 32.08 ± 2.6 | 6.84 ± 0.76 | 78.92 ± 4.50 | 82.86 ± 5.76 |
| T1/2 (h) | 14.03 ± 0.71 | 22.68 ± 1.98 | 9.72 ± 0.51 | 248.75 ± 10.12 |
| AUC0–24 (μg/mL.h) | 468.59 ± 13.81 | 125.74 ± 14.13 | 964.04 ±14.84 | 1854.08 ± 23.62 |
| MRT (h) | 22.34 ± 2.15 | 33.78 ± 2.81 | 13.33 ± 0.87 | 359.14 ± 20.88 |
Data represents mean ± SD. (n = 5).
In vivo organ biodistribution after pulmonary administration of plain LVX and LVX-loaded microspheres.
| Formulation | Organ | % Dose Detected | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 h | 1 h | 2 h | 6 h | 12 h | 24 h | ||
| Plain LVX | Serum | 9.70 ± 1.81 | 15.91 ± 2.18 | 18.80 ± 1.74 | 26.78 ± 2.51 | 17.65 ± 1.29 | 13.12 ± 1.11 |
| Lung | 78.95 ± 2.97 | 69.76 ± 2.26 | 60.53 ± 2.32 | 49.12 ± 1.34 | 42.79 ± 1.53 | 28.60 ± 1.79 | |
| Liver | 2.37 ± 1.06 | 3.01 ± 0.97 | 4.27 ± 1.11 | 5.05 ± 1.72 | 7.07 ± 1.65 | 8.35 ± 1.96 | |
| Spleen | 1.38 ± 0.40 | 2.75 ± 0.67 | 4.35 ± 1.02 | 4.19 ± 1.11 | 4.72 ± 0.98 | 5.04 ± 1.14 | |
| Kidney | ND * | 0.62 ± 0.20 | 1.17 ± 0.45 | 2.04 ± 0.41 | 1.78 ± 0.34 | 1.49 ± 0.47 | |
| LVX-loaded microspheres | Serum | 4.24 ± 1.45 | 5.8 ± 1.69 | 6.34 ± 1.74 | 6.525 ± 1.52 | 4.755 ± 1.49 | 3.735 ± 1.24 |
| Lung | 85.94 ± 3.61 | 82.32 ± 2.11 | 80.15 ± 2.43 | 78.05 ± 1.42 | 76.79 ± 1.68 | 74.11 ± 2.05 | |
| Liver | 1.71 ± 0.64 | 2.15 ± 0.79 | 2.68 ± 0.83 | 2.98 ± 1.01 | 3.36 ± 1.12 | 3.17 ± 0.98 | |
| Spleen | 0.55 ± 0.11 | 0.72 ± 0.16 | 0.95 ± 0.14 | 1.3 ± 0.19 | 0.81 ± 0.21 | 1.18 ± 0.26 | |
| Kidney | ND * | 0.57 ± 0.19 | 1.29 ± 0.23 | 1.69 ± 0.31 | 1.59 ± 0.45 | 0.45 ± 0.11 | |
All data represents the mean ± SD. * ND: not detectable. (n = 5).