Literature DB >> 35631064

Antibiotic Resistance in Non-Typhoidal Salmonella enterica Strains Isolated from Chicken Meat in Indonesia.

Minori Takaichi1, Kayo Osawa2, Ryohei Nomoto3, Noriko Nakanishi3, Masanori Kameoka1, Makiko Miura2, Katsumi Shigemura1,4, Shohiro Kinoshita5, Koichi Kitagawa5, Atsushi Uda6,7, Takayuki Miyara6, Ni Made Mertaniasih8, Usman Hadi8, Dadik Raharjo9,10, Ratna Yulistiani11, Masato Fujisawa4, Kuntaman Kuntaman9,10, Toshiro Shirakawa4,5.   

Abstract

The increase in antibiotic resistance in non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica (NTS) has been confirmed in Indonesia by this study. We confirmed the virulence genes and antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical NTS (n = 50) isolated from chicken meat in Indonesia and also detected antimicrobial resistance genes. Of 50 strains, 30 (60%) were non-susceptible to nalidixic acid (NA) and all of them had amino acid mutations in gyrA. Among 27 tetracycline (TC) non-susceptible strains, 22 (81.5%) had tetA and/or tetB. The non-susceptibility rates to ampicillin, gentamicin or kanamycin were lower than that of NA or TC, but the prevalence of blaTEM or aadA was high. Non-susceptible strains showed a high prevalence of virulence genes compared with the susceptible strains (tcfA, p = 0.014; cdtB, p < 0.001; sfbA, p < 0.001; fimA, p = 0.002). S. Schwarzengrund was the most prevalent serotype (23 strains, 46%) and the most frequently detected as multi-antimicrobial resistant. The prevalence of virulence genes in S. Schwarzengrund was significantly higher than other serotypes in hlyE (p = 0.011) and phoP/Q (p = 0.011) in addition to the genes above. In conclusion, NTS strains isolated from Indonesian chicken had a high resistance to antibiotics and many virulence factors. In particular, S. Schwarzengrund strains were most frequently detected as multi-antimicrobial resistant and had a high prevalence of virulence genes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indonesia; antimicrobial resistance; chicken; non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica (NTS); virulence factors

Year:  2022        PMID: 35631064      PMCID: PMC9143091          DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11050543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathogens        ISSN: 2076-0817


1. Introduction

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica is broadly classified into typhoid Salmonella, such as S. enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A, and non-typhoid Salmonella (NTS). More than 2600 serotypes of NTS have been identified, and many are known to cause invasive infections or enterocolitis with diarrhea in humans [1,2]. NTS can be easily acquired and spread by the consumption of contaminated foods of animal origin, including eggs, beef, dairy products and poultry [3]. The main symptoms of NTS infections are gastroenteritis, including diarrhea, sepsis, endocarditis, pulmonary infections, and intra-abdominal infections [3]. It is estimated that NTS causes 93.8 million cases of acute gastroenteritis and 15,000 deaths worldwide each year, and it is estimated that 86% of these are food-borne infections [4]. The pathogenicity of NTS is defined by a variety of factors encoded in virulence genes involved in adhesion (fimA, agfA), invasion (invA, fliC, sopB), survival and replication in macrophages (phoP/Q, slyA), systemic infection (spvC, ssel), fimbrial expression (tcfA), toxin production (hlyE, cdtB), and Mg2+ and iron uptake (sfbA) [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Ciprofloxacin (CPFX), ceftriaxone (CTRX) and azithromycin (AZM) are recommended for treatment for some patients with NTS infection [12]. However, NTS strains resistant to these antibiotics have been identified, making treatment clinically difficult [13]. The mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance of NTS are generally the production of antimicrobial inactivating enzymes (aac(6′)-lb-cr: quinolone resistance, blaTEM: ampicillin resistance, aadA: aminoglycoside resistance), modification of antimicrobial targets, such as gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE (quinolone resistance-determining region: QRDR) and qnrA, qnrB and qnrS (plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: PMQR), antimicrobial efflux (qepA: quinolone resistance, tetA, tetB, tetC and tetG: tetracycline resistance), and the restriction of antimicrobial uptake [12,14,15,16]. The antimicrobial resistance of NTS has been increasing not only in humans but also in poultry in many countries, especially in Asia [17]. The rapid increase in antimicrobial-resistant NTS has become a major public health problem in both developing and developed countries [1]. Misuse and overuse of antibiotics are believed to be the main reasons for the increase in antimicrobial-resistant bacteria [18]. Since the major source of NTS infection is food of animal origin, it has been suggested that the presence of antimicrobial-resistant NTS may be transferred through the food chain to humans [19]. Indonesia is one of the countries projected to have the largest percentage increase in antimicrobial consumption by 2030 [20]. In Indonesia, where about 90% of the population is Muslim, chicken meat accounts for a high percentage of meat consumption [21]. Therefore, if the chicken meat is contaminated with antimicrobial-resistant NTS, there is a possibility that infection with antimicrobial-resistant NTS will spread in Indonesia, and this has not been fully investigated. In this study, we confirmed the virulence genes and antimicrobial susceptibilities of NTS isolated from chicken meat in Indonesia, and also detected antimicrobial-resistant genes. We additionally determined the relatedness among the strains by multilocus sequence typing (MLST).

2. Results

2.1. Serotyping

Table 1 shows the O serotype groups and serotypes determined from somatic (O) and flagella (H) antigens in 50 strains. The most common O serotype was the O4 group (28 strains, 56%). There were 2 strains in the O2 group, 3 strains in the O7 group, 11 strains in the O8 group, 3 strains in the O9 group, and 2 strains in the O3,10 group, and 1 strain in the O1,3,19 group. S. Schwarzengrund in the O4 group was the most common serotype (23 strains, 46%), followed by S. Istanbul in the O8 group (4 strains, 8%).
Table 1

Distribution of O groups and serotypes in 50 non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) strains.

O GroupSerotypeStrains (%)
O2S. Kiel1 (2)
S. Nitra1 (2)
O4S. Schwarzengrund23 (46)
S. Tokoin2 (4)
S. Typhimurium2 (4)
S. Budapest1 (2)
O7NT 3 (6)
O8S. Istanbul4 (8)
S. Corvallis2 (4)
S. Portanigra1 (2)
S. Herston1 (2)
NT3 (6)
O9S. Enteritidis2 (4)
NT1 (2)
O3,10NT2 (4)
O1,3,19S. Liverpool1 (2)
total50

※ NT: not typed.

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing are shown in Table 2. Of 50 strains, 34 (68%) were non-susceptible to at least one antibiotic. In detail, the strains were non-susceptible to: ampicillin (ABPC; 13 strains, 26%), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMPC/CVA; 3 strains, 6%), gentamicin (GM; 6 strains, 12%), kanamycin (KM; 8 strains, 16%), tetracycline (TC; 27 strains, 54%), CPFX (5 strains, 10%) and nalidixic acid (NA; 30 strains, 60%). In addition, five strains (10%) were non-susceptible to CPFX, which is recommended as a therapeutic agent, but all were susceptible to CTRX and AZM, which are also recommended. Of 34 strains, 27 strains (79.4%) were non-susceptible to two or more antibiotics.
Table 2

Antimicrobial susceptibility rates of S. Schwarzengrund and other serotypes of NTS strains.

Antibiotic *Number of Non-Susceptible Strains (%)p-Value #
Totaln = 50S. Schwarzengrundn = 23Other Serotypesn = 27
ABPC 13 (26)11 (47.8)2 (7.4) 0.001
AMPC/CVA 3 (6)1 (4.3)2 (7.4)1.000
CTRX 000-
IPM 000-
GM 6 (12)5 (21.7)1 (3.7)0.070
KM 8 (16)7 (30.4)1 (3.7) 0.007
AZM 000-
TC 27 (54)22 (95.7)5 (18.5) <0.001
CPFX 5 (10)2 (8.7)3 (11.1)1.000
NA 30 (60)23 (100)7 (25.9) <0.001
CP 000-

* ABPC: ampicillin, AMPC/CVA: amoxicillin/clavulanate, CTRX: ceftriaxone, IPM: imipenem, GM: gentamicin, KM: kanamycin, AZM: azithromycin, TC: tetracycline, CPFX: ciprofloxacin, NA: nalidixic acid, CP: chloramphenicol. # bold indicates significant levels, p < 0.05.

Twelve strains (35.3%) were non-susceptible to ABPC, KM and/or GM, TC and NA, including CPFX. All S. Schwarzengrund were non-susceptible to at least one antibiotic (23 strains, 100%) and were especially non-susceptible to ABPC (11 strains, 47.8%), AMPC/CVA (1 strain, 4.3%), GM (5 strains, 21.7%), KM (7 strains, 30.4%), TC (22 strains, 95.7%), CPFX (2 strains, 8.7%) and NA (23 strains, 100%). Among 23 strains, 22 strains (95.7%) were non-susceptible with two or more antibiotics. Eleven strains (47.8%) were non-susceptible to ABPC, KM and/or GM, TC and NA, including CPFX. In the other serotypes, 11 of the 27 strains (40.7%) were non-susceptible to at least one antibiotic, and 5 strains (18.5%) were non-susceptible to two or more antibiotics, and 2 strains (7.4%) were non-susceptible to three or more antibiotics. S. Schwarzengrund had significantly higher non-susceptible rates than other serotypes for ABPC (p = 0.001), KM (p = 0.007), TC (p < 0.001) and NA (p < 0.001).

2.3. Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes is shown in Table 3. Most of the non-susceptible strains to ABPC (12 of 13 strains, 92.3%) possessed blaTEM. Eleven strains were S. Schwarzengrund and one strain was S. Budapest. Among six non-susceptible strains to GM, four (66.7%) had aadA and all of them were S. Schwarzengrund. In 27 non-susceptible strains to TC, 22 (81.5%) had tetA and/or tetB, of which 15 (68.2%) had tetA, 6 (27.3%) had tetB, and 1 (4.5%) had tetA and tetB, but not tetC or tetG. Of 15 strains with tetA, 11 were S. Schwarzengrund and 4 were S. Istanbul. Of six strains with tetB, five were S. Schwarzengrund and one was S. Budapest. One strain that had tetA and tetB was S. Schwarzengrund. Among 30 strains non-susceptible to NA, QRDR mutations, especially gyrA, were detected in all strains. The S83→Y mutation in gyrA was the most common mutation (27 strains; 90%), including all 23 strains of S. Schwarzengrund. The D87→N mutation in gyrA was found in two strains (6.7%) which are S. Enteritidis. In addition, only one strain (3.3%) of the other serotype had two mutations of gyrA (S83→F and D87→N) with a mutation in parC (S81→I). PMQR was not found in these strains.
Table 3

Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes in S. Schwarzengrund and other serotype strains.

Antimicrobial Resistance GeneNumber of Strains (%)
TotalS. SchwarzengrundOther Serotypes
bla TEM 1211 (91.7) 1 (8.3)
aadA 44 (100)0
tetA 1511 (73.3)4 (26.7)
tetB 65 (83.3) 1 (16.7)
tetA and tetB 11 (100) 0
tetC 000
tetG 000
Mutation of gyrA 3023 (76.7) 7 (23.3)
Mutation of gyrB 000
Mutation of parC 1 *01 (100)
Mutation of parE 000
qnrA 000
qnrB 000
qnrS 000
aac(6′)-lb-cr 000
qepA 00 0

* The strain had also 2 mutations of gyrA (S83→F and D87→N).

2.4. Detection of Genes Encoding Virulence Factors

The prevalence of genes encoding virulence factors is shown in Table 4. Of 13 genes, invA was confirmed in all strains (50 strains, 100%). Other genes were detected as follows: sopB (44 strains, 88%), tcfA (37 strains, 74%), hlyE (43 strains, 86%), cdtB (25 strains, 50%), sfbA (31strains, 62%), agfA (44 strains, 88%), fimA (32 strains, 64%), slyA (30 strains, 60%), and phoP/Q (43 strains, 86%). No strains had sseI, fliC or spvC.
Table 4

Prevalence of virulence genes in S. Schwarzengrund and other serotype strains.

Virulence GeneNumber of Strains (%)p-Value *
Totaln = 50S. Schwarzengrundn = 23Other Serotypesn = 27
invA 50 (100)23 (100) 27 (100)-
sopB 44 (88)21 (91.3)23 (85.2)0.674
ssel 000-
tcfA 37 (74)23 (100) 14 (51.9)<0.001
hlyE 43 (86)23 (100) 20 (74.1)0.011
cdtB 25 (50)21 (91.3)4 (14.8)<0.001
sfbA 31 (62)23 (100) 8 (29.6)<0.001
agfA 44 (88)22 (95.7)22 (81.5)0.199
fimA 32 (64)21 (91.3)11 (40.7)<0.001
fliC 000-
spvC 000-
slyA 30 (60)16 (69.6)14 (51.9)0.254
phoP/Q 43 (86)23 (100) 20 (74.1)0.011

* bold indicates significant levels, p < 0.05.

Prevalence of virulence genes in non-susceptible strains compared with susceptible strains showed significant differences in tcfA (85.3% vs. 50%; p = 0.014), cdtB (73.5% vs. 0%; p < 0.001), sfbA (91.2% vs. 0%; p < 0.001) and fimA (79.4% vs. 31.3%; p = 0.002). All S. Schwarzengrund strains showed non-susceptibility to antibiotics and the prevalence of virulence genes in S. Schwarzengrund strains was significantly higher than other serotypes strains in tcfA (100% vs. 60.9%; p < 0.001), hlyE (100% vs. 74.1%; p = 0.011), cdtB (91.3% vs. 14.8%; p < 0.001), sfbA (100% vs. 29.6%; p < 0.001), fimA (91.3% vs. 40.7%; p < 0.001), and phoP/Q (100% vs. 74%; p = 0.011).

2.5. MLST

S. Schwarzengrund had a higher rate of non-susceptibility to antibiotics than other serotypes and all S. Schwarzengrund strains had the S83→Y mutation in gyrA and a high prevalence of virulence genes. Therefore, we determined the homology of 23 S. Schwarzengrund strains by MLST. They were classified into sequence type (ST) 96 (22 strains, 95.7%) while one strain (4.3%) differed only in hisD and was not typed (Table 5).
Table 5

Classification in 23 S. Schwarzengrund strains by Multilocus sequence typing (MLST).

Sequence TypeAllelic Profile in MLSTNumber of Strains (%)N = 23
aroCdnaNhemDhisDpurEsucAthrA
96 434749494115322 (95.7)
Not typed4347497411531 (4.3)

3. Discussion

Our study investigated the antimicrobial susceptibilities and genetic analysis of 50 NTS strains isolated from chicken meat in Indonesia. This is the first known report of antimicrobial resistance in NTS strains isolated from Indonesian chicken. The O4 group was the most common serotype of NTS strains, and S. Schwarzengrund was mainly detected. S. Schwarzengrund is one of the major serotypes isolated from humans and animals and has been reported as an epidemic pathogen in Asia, Denmark and the United States since early 2000 [22]. Among the NTS strains, we observed that 68% (34 of 50 strains) were non-susceptible to antibiotics. Moreso, especially 60% (30 of 50 strains) were non-susceptible to NA. All strains non-susceptible to NA had amino acid mutations at positions 83 and 87, including S83→Y mutation in gyrA. NTS strains with S83→Y mutation were also detected in poultry from Brazil [23]. Mutations in QRDR of gyrA and/or parC genes are most commonly related to the resistance of quinolones in Salmonella strains and other bacteria [12]. Non-susceptible strains of TC were the second-most detected (54%) because TC was commonly used in poultry feed for protection against infectious diseases and growth promotion. Of 27 non-susceptible strains to TC, 81.5% carried tetA and/or tetB, two genes most frequently involved in tetracycline resistance in NTS strains. The prevalence of tetA was higher than that of tetB, consistent with studies in the Nigeria [18,24,25,26]. The non-susceptible rate to ABPC, GM or KM in NTS strains was lower than that of NA or TC, however, the prevalence of blaTEM or aadA was high. Since blaTEM and aadA are present on plasmids, they may lead to horizontal transmission of antimicrobial resistance genes across other Salmonella or other bacteria. Moreover, strains non-susceptible to antibiotics had a significantly high prevalence of virulence genes, such as tcfA, cdtB, fimA and sfbA, encoding ciliary proteins, intracellular survival, adhesion and iron uptake, than susceptible strains. Among the NTS strains, S. Schwarzengrund was significantly more resistant to ABPC, KM, TC and NA than other serotypes. Of 23 S. Schwarzengrund, 22 (95.7%) were non-susceptible to two or more antibiotics, and 11 (47.8%) were non-susceptible to ABPC, KM and/or GM, TC and NA, including CPFX. Furthermore, it has been reported that multidrug-resistant S. Schwarzengrund was isolated from food, including chicken, and from human samples in Taiwan, Thailand, Denmark and the United States [27]. We also found that one strain of S. Schwarzengrund isolated from a fetal specimen had multidrug resistance in Japan [28]. In addition to the virulence genes above, S. Schwarzengrund also had hlyE and phoP/Q encoding toxin production and survival within macrophages, respectively. The virulence rate of S. Schwarzengrund was higher than for other serotypes. S. Schwarzengrund strains were approximately identified as ST96. ST96 strains were reported to carry mcr-1, a plasmidic gene encoding colistin resistance in Brazilian chicken [29]. The multidrug-resistant S. Schwarzengrund might easily spread in the human body and become difficult to treat. The limitations of this study include the number of subjects (50), and that 46% of 50 strains were S. Schwarzengrund. Thus, the sample size was insufficient for an epidemiological survey and there were few serotypes to characterize and compare. Additionally, it is necessary to investigate other mechanisms (other antibiotic-inactivating enzymes or efflux pumps, for instance) related to antibiotic resistance [30].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains

We isolated 50 strains of Salmonella enterica by the following methods from 60 duct rectal swabs and 60 chicken intestines of meats in 12 traditional markets in Surabaya, Indonesia in 2018 [31]. Salmonella strains were isolated according to the methods of the Bacteriological Analytical Manual [32], with some modifications.

4.2. Serotyping

The isolates were serotyped with polyvalent O and H antiserum by the agglutination method using the Salmonella immune serum “Seiken” (Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan).

4.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The test for the NTS strains measured 11 antibiotics (ampicillin: ABPC, amoxicillin/clavulanate: AMPC/CVA, ceftriaxone: CTRX, imipenem: IPM, gentamicin: GM, kanamycin: KM, azithromycin: AZM, tetracycline: TC, ciprofloxacin: CPFX, nalidixic acid: NA, chloramphenicol: CP) by the microdilution method using Optipanel E063 (Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). In the Optipanel, 96-well microtiter plates containing cation-adjusted Muller–Hinton broth with twofold dilutions of each antimicrobial solution were prepared according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations [33]. The Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 strain was used for quality control. Criteria were in accordance with CLSI M100-ED31 [33].

4.4. DNA Extraction and Detection of Antimicrobial Resistant Genes

Bacterial DNA was extracted by the boiling method. The bacterial samples were suspended in the Tris-HCL buffer, incubated at 100 °C for 15 min and immediately cooled, centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was collected. Primers were shown in Table 6. We detected antimicrobial resistance genes (blaTEM for β-lactam resistance; aadA for aminoglycoside resistance; tetA, tetB, tetC and tetG for tetracycline resistance) by PCR using TaKaRa Ex Taq (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) [34,35,36].
Table 6

Primer pairs used for the analysis of antimicrobial-resistant genes.

Target GenesAmplicon Size (bp)Tm (°C)PrimerSequenceReference
bla TEM 69060blaTEMF5′-TTTCGTGTCGCCCTTATTC-3′[34]
blaTEMR5′-CCGGCTCCAGATTTATCA-3′
aadA 52560aadAF5′-GTGGATGGCGGCCTGAA-3′
aadAR 5′-AATGCCCAGTCGGCAGC-3′
tetA 20155tetAF5′-GCTACATCCTGCTTGCCT-3′
tetAR5′-CATAGATCGCCGTGAAG-3′
tetB 17363TetBGK-F2m5′-CGCCCAGTGCTGTTGTTGTC-3′[35]
TetBGK-R2m5′-CGCGTTGAGAAGCTGAGGTG-3′
tetC 50550TetCF5′-GGTTGAAGGCTCTCAAGGGC-3′[36]
TetCR5′-CCTCTTGCGGGAATCGTCC-3′
tetG 66252TetGF5′-GCAGCGAAAGCGTATTTGCG-3′
TetGR5′-TCCGAAAGCTGTCCAAGCAT-3′
gyrA 25158.6stgyrA1 5′-CGTTGGTGACGTAATCGGTA-3′[37]
stgyrA25′-CCGTACCGTCATAGTTATCC-3′
gyrB 18158stmgyrB15′-GCGCTGTCCGAACTGTACCT-3′[38]
stmgyrB25′-TGATCAGCGTCGCCACTTCC-3′
parC 27067stmparC15′-CTATGCGATG TCAGAGCTGG-3′
stmparC25′-TAACAGCAGCTCGGCGTATT-3′
parE 240stmparE15′TCTCTTCCGATGAAGTGCTG-3′
stmparE25′-ATACGGTATAGCGGCGGTAG-3′
qnrA 51653qnrA F5′-ATTTCTCACGCCAGGATTTG-3′[39]
qnrA R5′-GATCGGCAAAGGTTAGGTCA-3′
qnrB 46959qnrB F5′-GATCGTGAAAGCCAGAAAGG-3′
qnrB R5′-ACGATGCCTG¬GTAGTTGTCC-3′
qnrS 417qnrS F5′-ACGACATTCGTCAACTGCAA-3′
qnrS R5′- TAAATTGGCACCCTGTAGGC-3′
aac (6 ′)-Ib-cr 554aac(6′)-Ib-cr F5′-TGACCAACAGCAACGATTCC-3′
aac(6′)-Ib-cr R5′-TTAGGCATCACTGCGTGTTC-3′
qepA 720qepA F5′-GGACATCTACGGCTTCTTCG-3′
qepA R5′-AGCTGCAGGTACTGCGTCAT-3′
We also detected amino acid mutations in QRDR (gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE), and the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes (qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, qepA and aac (6′)-Ib-cr) by PCR and sequencing [37,38,39]. The purification of PCR products was conducted with the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and the sequencing analysis was done by Eurofins Genomics (Eurofins Genomics, Tokyo, Japan).

4.5. Detection of Genes Encoding Virulence Factors

Thirteen genes of encoding virulence factors (invA, sopB, ssel, tcfA, hlyE, cdtB, sfbA, agfA, fimA, fliC, spvC, slyA and phoP/Q) were detected by PCR and sequencing analysis [5,6,7,40]. The PCR conditions were 94 °C, 2 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C, 1 min; 55 °C, 1 min; 72 °C, 2 min; 72 °C, 4 min.

4.6. MLST

MLST was conducted by PCR amplification and sequencing of seven housekeeping genes (suc, hisD, thr, pur, dnaN, hem and aro) [41]. The temperature conditions were initial denaturing at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 53 °C (dnaN) or 60 °C (except dnaN) each for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 4 min. ST was determined using the MLST website [42].

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Significant differences between serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibilities, or serotypes and virulence genes, were determined by Fisher’s exact test using SPSS software, version 24.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

We found that NTS strains isolated from Indonesian chicken had a high resistance to antibiotics and many virulence factors. In particular, S. Schwarzengrund strains belonging to ST96 were the most frequently detected as multi-antimicrobial resistant and had a high prevalence of virulence genes. These NTS strains in food or other environments might be transmitted to humans, and it is necessary to continue investigating NTS strains with resistance to antibiotics.
  35 in total

1.  Characterization of drug resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium by antibiograms, plasmids, integrons, resistance genes and PFGE.

Authors:  Douadi Benacer; Kwai-Lin Thong; Haruo Watanabe; Savithri Devi Puthucheary
Journal:  J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.351

2.  First report of mcr-1-harboring Salmonella enterica serovar Schwarzengrund isolated from poultry meat in Brazil.

Authors:  Luisa Z Moreno; Vasco T M Gomes; Jéssica Moreira; Carolina H de Oliveira; Bárbara P Peres; Ana Paula S Silva; Siddhartha Thakur; Roberto M La Ragione; Andrea M Moreno
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  SlyA, a transcriptional regulator of Salmonella typhimurium, is required for resistance to oxidative stress and is expressed in the intracellular environment of macrophages.

Authors:  N Buchmeier; S Bossie; C Y Chen; F C Fang; D G Guiney; S J Libby
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Genomic characteristics and comparative genomics of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Schwarzengrund strain S16 isolated from chicken feces.

Authors:  Seung-Min Yang; Eiseul Kim; Woojung Lee; Hae-Yeong Kim
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.181

5.  Genetic diversity, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from food and humans over a 24-year period in Brazil.

Authors:  Fábio Campioni; Alzira Maria Moratto Bergamini; Juliana P Falcão
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.516

6.  Virulence gene profiling and pathogenicity characterization of non-typhoidal Salmonella accounted for invasive disease in humans.

Authors:  Jotham Suez; Steffen Porwollik; Amir Dagan; Alex Marzel; Yosef Ilan Schorr; Prerak T Desai; Vered Agmon; Michael McClelland; Galia Rahav; Ohad Gal-Mor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prevalence of tet genes mediating tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli clinical isolates in Osun State, Nigeria.

Authors:  O A Olowe; O J Idris; S S Taiwo
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2013-06-05

Review 8.  Fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella: insights by whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Wim L Cuypers; Jan Jacobs; Vanessa Wong; Elizabeth J Klemm; Stijn Deborggraeve; Sandra Van Puyvelde
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2018-07-05

Review 9.  An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria.

Authors:  Wanda C Reygaert
Journal:  AIMS Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-26

10.  Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC) and Salmonella Species Recovered from Diarrheal Patients in Selected Rural Communities of the Amathole District Municipality, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Luyanda Msolo; Benson C Iweriebor; Anthony I Okoh
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.