| Literature DB >> 35630793 |
Anelia Mavrova1, Stephan Dimov1, Inna Sulikovska2, Denitsa Yancheva3, Ivan Iliev2,4, Iana Tsoneva4, Galya Staneva4, Biliana Nikolova4.
Abstract
Novel 4-amino-thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine-6-carboxylates substituted at the second position were prepared by cyclocondensation of 2-amino-3-cyano-thiophene and aryl nitriles in an acidic medium. The design of the target compounds was based on structural optimization. The derivatives thus obtained were tested in vitro against human and mouse cell lines. The examination of the compound effects on BLAB 3T3 and MFC-10A cells showed that they are safe, making them suitable for subsequent experiments to establish their antitumor activity. The photoirritancy factor of the compounds was calculated. Using the MTT test, the antiproliferative activity to MCF-10A, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines was estimated. The best antiproliferative effect in respect to the MCF-7 cell line revealed compound 2 with IC50 4.3 ± 0.11 µg/mL (0.013 µM). The highest selective index with respect to MCF-7 cells was shown by compound 3 (SI = 19.3), and to MDA-MB-231 cells by compound 2 (SI = 3.7). Based on energy analysis, the most stable conformers were selected and optimized by means of density functional theory (DFT). Ligand efficiency, ligand lipophilicity efficiency and the physicochemical parameters of the target 4-amino-thienopyrimidines were determined. The data obtained indicated that the lead compound among the tested substances is compound 2.Entities:
Keywords: 4-amino-thienopyrimidines; antiproliferation; cytotoxicity; molecular structure; phototoxicity; structure–activity relationship
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35630793 PMCID: PMC9148072 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27103314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Reported thienopyrimidines as tyrosine kinases inhibitors [13,14,17,20,21,22,24,26].
Figure 2Structural optimization of compound A and B, MW (Molecular weight).
Scheme 1Synthesis of ethyl 4-amino-5-methyl-thieno [2,3-d]pyrimidine-6 carboxylates 2–8.
Figure 3Tautomeric forms of compound 2.
Figure 4Bond-length alterations in the studied 4-amino-5-methyl-thieno [2,3-d]pyrimidine-6 carboxylates: 2-benzyl vs. 2-aryl substituted derivatives.
Figure 5Cytotoxicity and phototoxicity of compound 2–7 to BALB 3T3 expressed in % relative to the negative control.
Cyto- and phototoxicity assay data.
| Cell Line | Compounds | CC50 of Mean ± SD (µg/mL) | PIF * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytotoxicity | Phototoxicity | |||
| BALB 3T3 |
| 1212 ± 103.3 | 632.3 ± 35.6 | 1.9 |
|
| 1155 ± 57.8 | 578 ± 58.7 | 2 | |
|
| 8.37 ± 0.6 | 11.85 ± 0.8 | 0.7 | |
|
| - | - | - | |
|
| - | - | - | |
|
| 2754 ± 64.3 | 2552 ± 75.1 | 1.08 | |
* PIF (Photoirritancy factor), PIF < 2 not phototoxic, PIF ≥ 2 and < 5 probable phototoxicity, PIF ≥ 5 phototoxic.
Figure 6Antiproliferative activities of compounds 2–7 expressed in % relative to the negative control.
Anti-proliferative activity data. IC50 values in µg/mL and µM.
| Compounds | IC50 ± SD (μg/mL) Resp. in (µM) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Antiproliferative Activity | |||
| MCF-10A | MCF-7 | MDA-MB-231 | |
|
| 67.77 ± 9.1 | 4.3 ± 0.11 | 18.28 ± 1.58 |
|
| 165.4 ± 8.81 | 8.58 ± 0.55 | 98.25 ± 4.73 |
|
| 2.74 ± 0.13 | 2.01 ± 0.07 | 6.43 ± 0.95 |
|
| 39.23 ± 1.8 | 95.94 ± 3.49 | 94.94 ± 1.48 |
|
| 410.9 ± 5.1 | 444.5 ± 9.2 | |
|
| >1000 | >1000 | >1000 |
Determination of selective index (SI).
| Compounds | Selective Index | |
|---|---|---|
| MCF-7 | MDA-MB-231 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.7 |
|
| 1.4 | 0.4 |
|
| 0.41 | 0.41 |
|
| 0.92 |
|
|
| - | - |
Physicochemical properties and revealed LE and LLE of compounds A, 2–7 in MCF-7 test.
| No | IC50 (µM)/ | LE kcal/mol | LEI | BEI | LLE | clogP | MW | TPSA | NHA | NHD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.013 | 0.476 | 0.347 | 0.024 | 3.984 | 3.986 | 327.41 | 78.11 | 5 | 2 |
|
| 0.023 | 0.421 | 0.306 | 0.021 | 3.910 | 3.73 | 372.41 | 123.94 | 8 | 2 |
|
| 0.005 | 0.425 | 0.321 | 0.022 | 4.83 | 3.469 | 403.46 | 105.81 | 8 | 2 |
|
| 0.25 | 0.263 | 0.269 | 0.018 | 1.89 | 4.71 | 381.38 | 78.11 | 5 | 2 |
|
| 1.41 | 0.372 | 0.27 | 0.019 | 3.247 | 2.603 | 314.37 | 91.00 | 6 | 2 |
|
| 0.074 | 0.243 | 0.178 | 0.012 | 3.143 | 3.987 | 646.15 | 177.84 | 13 | 3 |
LE and LLE of compounds B, 2–6 in MDA-MB-31 test.
| No | IC50 | (pCI50) | LE | LEI | BEI | LLE | Vol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.056 | 7.25 | 0.476 | 0.346 | 0.024 | 4.014 | 287.82 |
|
| 0.26 | 6.585 | 0.369 | 0.269 | 0.019 | 3.27 | 311.16 |
|
| 0.016 | 7.796 | 0.391 | 0.286 | 0.002 | 4.531 | 347.66 |
|
| 0.25 | 6.60 | 0.384 | 0.280 | 0.018 | 4.71 | 302.32 |
|
| 0.37 | 6.431 | 0.436 | 0.318 | 0.022 | 4.37 | 266.87 |
|
| 0.32 | 6.444 | 0.342 | 0.28 | 0.018 | 5.64 | 344.08 |
B *: clogP = 1.36; TPSA—112.01; MW—399.48; NHA—8; NHD—4.