| Literature DB >> 35630149 |
Florina Silvia Iliescu1,2, Ling Tim Hong3, Jin Ming Jaden Toh1,3, Mirela Petruta Suchea2,4, Octavian Narcis Ionescu2,5, Ciprian Iliescu2,6,7.
Abstract
Improper foot biomechanics associated with uneven bodyweight distribution contribute to impaired balance and fall risks. There is a need to complete the panel of commercially available devices for the self-measurement of BMI, fat, muscle, bone, weight, and hydration with one that measures weight-shifting at home as a pre-specialist assessment system. This paper reports the development of the Early Notice Pointer (ENP), a user-friendly screening device based on weighing scale technology. The ENP is designed to be used at home to provide a graphic indication and customised and evidence-based foot and posture triage. The device electronically detects and maps the bodyweight and distinct load distributions on the main areas of the feet: forefoot and rearfoot. The developed platform also presents features that assess the user's balance, and the results are displayed as a simple numerical report and map. The technology supports data display on mobile phones and accommodates multiple measurements for monitoring. Therefore, the evaluation could be done at non-specialist and professional levels. The system has been tested to validate its accuracy, precision, and consistency. A parallel study to describe the frequency of arch types and metatarsal pressure in young adults (1034 healthy subjects) was conducted to explain the importance of self-monitoring at home for better prevention of foot arch- and posture-related conditions. The results showed the potential of the newly created platform as a screening device ready to be wirelessly connected with mobile phones and the internet for remote and personalised identification and monitoring of foot- and body balance-related conditions. The real-time interpretation of the reported physiological parameters opens new avenues toward IoT-like on-body monitoring of human physiological signals through easy-to-use devices on flexible substrates for specific versatility.Entities:
Keywords: IoT; POCT; foot arch; personalised medicine; prophylaxis; screening posture
Year: 2022 PMID: 35630149 PMCID: PMC9144081 DOI: 10.3390/mi13050682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 3.523
Figure 1The design of the ENP: (a) an overview of the developed system, the segregation of eight different regions of the foot arches, and the placement of the sensory cells within the force sensor plates for signal processing, Wi-Fi transmission, iCloud databasing, and displaying and transmitting results; (b) the schematics of the electronics with one load cell connection exemplified.
Figure 2(a) The simple architecture prototype used for standing and measuring bodyweight load distribution on both feet: (1) inter-plate connection; (2) area of the platform that corresponds to the right forefoot that corresponds to pressure sensor cells; (3) electronics; (4) area of the platform that corresponds to the right rearfoot that corresponds to pressure sensor cells; (5) electronics; (6) area of the platform that corresponds to the left rearfoot that corresponds to pressure sensor cells; (7) area of the platform that corresponds to the left forefoot that corresponds to pressure sensor cells; (8) electronics; and (b) the testing process that starts with the user checking their feet size using the measuring template on the plate.
Figure 3The website mode of ENP: (a) the Initiation and setup; (b) the Table page with multiple measurements to add.
The colour codes are based on the threshold for bodyweight percentage distribution detected by the load cells inside the platform.
| Red Point >= 2: Above Average Level | ||
|---|---|---|
| Blue Point > 2: Below Average Level | ||
| Red Point < 2 or Blue <= 2: Average Level | ||
| >=7.9% | >=16.1% | >=7.9% |
| <=4.9% | <=10.1% | <=4.9% |
| Best = 6.4%, <7.9% And >4.9% | Best = 13.1%, <16.1% and >10.1% | Best = 6.4%, Not < 7.9% and >4.9% |
| Any correct colour value will be given 1 point | Any correct colour value will be given 2 points | Any correct colour value will be given 1 point |
| >=19.8% | Weight Value | >=19.5% |
| <=13.8% | <=13.5% | |
| Best = 16.8%, <19.8% And >13.80% | Best = 16.5%, <19.5% and >13.5% | |
| Any correct colour value will be given 2 points | Any correct colour value will be given 2 points | |
| >=11.6% | >=23.2% | >=11.3% |
| <=8.6% | <=17.2% | <=8.3% |
| Best = 10.1%, <11.6 And >8.6% | Best = 20.2%, <23.2% and > 17.2% | Best = 9.8%, <11.3% and >8.3% |
| Any correct colour value will be given 1 point | Any correct colour value will be given 2 points | Any correct colour value will be given 1 point |
Figure 4The investigation protocol for foot arch and posture evaluation.
Figure 5The software displays for (a) the mobile App-based display, indicating an unbalanced distribution of bodyweight loads right-left and front-back; (b) the website display in weight chart; and (c) the percentage chart for various sections (1) Right and (2) Right Toes, (5) Left and (6) Left Toes, (3) Right and (4) Right Heel, and (7) Left Heel and (8) Heel.
Figure 6(a) The frequency of foot arch types; (b) The presence of metatarsal (MT) pressure in subjects in a young population.
Figure 7(a) The correlation of forefoot pressure (kPa) and weight (R = 0.13); (b) the correlation of rearfoot pressure (kPa) and weight (R = 0.16); (c) the correlation of forefoot pressure (kPa) and height (R = 0.16); (d) the correlation of rearfoot pressure (kPa) and height (R = 0.13); and (e) the tendency of weight bearing on rearfoot and forefoot (R = 0.12).
Figure 8(a) The correlation between torso and pelvis when carrying a backpack (R = 0.82); (b) the correlation between torso and pelvis when carrying a tote bag (R = 0.49); and (c) the correlation between torso and pelvis when carrying a sling/crossbody bag (R = 0.94).