BACKGROUND: People with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently have impaired postural control (balance). Psychometric properties of clinical tests of balance for individuals with MS, including the computerized dynamic posturography sensory organization test (CDP-SOT), are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the reliability and discriminant validity of the CDP-SOT in people with MS. METHODS: The CDP-SOT was performed on 30 participants with MS. A 2-week-interval, repeated-measures (sessions 1 and 2) design was implemented to investigate test-retest reliability of the CDP-SOT and the ability of the CDP-SOT to discriminate between participants with lower versus higher disability. Self-reported disability level was based on Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale scores: lower (PDDS scale score, 0-3; n = 17) and higher (PDDS scale score, 4-6; n = 13). RESULTS: All six conditions of the CDP-SOT had good-to-excellent reliability (interclass correlation coefficients, 0.70-0.90) and excellent reliability for composite scores (0.90). Composite scores were significantly greater in the lower-disability group versus the higher-disability group at session 1 (70.89 vs. 48.60, P = .001) and session 2 (74.82 vs. 48.85, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The CDP-SOT is a reliable measure of balance and accurately differentiates disability status in people with MS. Collectively, the results support clinical application of the CDP-SOT as a reliable and valid measure of disease-related progression of impaired balance related to sensory integration and its utility in determining changes in balance in response to treatment.
BACKGROUND:People with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently have impaired postural control (balance). Psychometric properties of clinical tests of balance for individuals with MS, including the computerized dynamic posturography sensory organization test (CDP-SOT), are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the reliability and discriminant validity of the CDP-SOT in people with MS. METHODS: The CDP-SOT was performed on 30 participants with MS. A 2-week-interval, repeated-measures (sessions 1 and 2) design was implemented to investigate test-retest reliability of the CDP-SOT and the ability of the CDP-SOT to discriminate between participants with lower versus higher disability. Self-reported disability level was based on Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale scores: lower (PDDS scale score, 0-3; n = 17) and higher (PDDS scale score, 4-6; n = 13). RESULTS: All six conditions of the CDP-SOT had good-to-excellent reliability (interclass correlation coefficients, 0.70-0.90) and excellent reliability for composite scores (0.90). Composite scores were significantly greater in the lower-disability group versus the higher-disability group at session 1 (70.89 vs. 48.60, P = .001) and session 2 (74.82 vs. 48.85, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The CDP-SOT is a reliable measure of balance and accurately differentiates disability status in people with MS. Collectively, the results support clinical application of the CDP-SOT as a reliable and valid measure of disease-related progression of impaired balance related to sensory integration and its utility in determining changes in balance in response to treatment.
Authors: C Leitner; P Mair; B Paul; F Wick; C Mittermaier; T Sycha; G Ebenbichler Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira; Luciano Teixeira Dos Santos; Pollyane Galinari Sabino; Regina Maria Papais Alvarenga; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler Journal: Mult Scler Int Date: 2013-03-31
Authors: Aikaterini Christogianni; Richard Bibb; Scott L Davis; Ollie Jay; Michael Barnett; Nikos Evangelou; Davide Filingeri Journal: Temperature (Austin) Date: 2018-09-05
Authors: Graham D Cochrane; Jennifer B Christy; Brian M Sandroff; Robert W Motl Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 3.919