| Literature DB >> 35629861 |
Ittiporn Keawpeng1, Somwang Lekjing2, Balaji Paulraj3, Karthikeyan Venkatachalam2.
Abstract
The present study was aimed to investigate the effects of sonication and clove oil incorporation on the improvement of physical, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties and lipid oxidation inhibiting abilities of mung bean flour (MF)-based films. There were three groups of films tested (1) MF: mung bean flour alone, (2) MFC: MF incorporated with 2% clove oil (C), and (3) MFCU: MFC prepared with sonication (25 kHz, 100% amplitude, 10 min). Film thickness and bulk density showed slight differences, and moisture content, solubility, and water vapor permeability significantly differed between the formulations. Tensile strength, elongation at break, and Young's modulus were highest for the MFCU films, followed by MFC and MF in rank order. Furthermore, the Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy results also demonstrated that the clove oil and sonication treatment had improved the interconnections of the biopolymers, thus increasing the physical strength of the film. Phytochemicals in terms of total phenolics and total flavonoids were elevated in the MFCU films and contributed to stronger radical scavenging abilities (p < 0.05). MFC and MFCU films showed a strong antibacterial control of the Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and also of the Gram-negative Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni). Overall, the lipid oxidation indicators Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS, peroxide value, p-anisidine value, and totox value) showed significantly high inhibition, attributed to radical scavenging activities in the MFCU and MFC samples. The mung bean flour films incorporated with clove oil and prepared with sonication have good potential as packaging materials for food due to strong physical, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties, as well as lipid oxidation inhibiting abilities.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant and antimicrobial properties; clove oil; edible films; mung bean flour; sonication
Year: 2022 PMID: 35629861 PMCID: PMC9146281 DOI: 10.3390/membranes12050535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1Schematic representation of mung bean flour film formation and its variations. Note MF represents mung bean flour films; MFC represents mung bean flour film incorporated with clove oil; MFCU represents the mung bean flour film incorporated with clove oil and processed with sonication.
Physical properties of mung bean flour-based films processed under different conditions.
| Treatments | Thickness | Bulk Density | Moisture Content | Solubility | WVP10−12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.191 ± 0.002 a | 0.857 ± 0.015 a | 12.477 ± 0.306 a | 31.0 ± 1.00 a | 6.03 ± 0.074 a |
|
| 0.196 ± 0.001 a | 0.943 ± 0.006 a | 10.28 ± 0.605 b | 29.66 ± 0.57 b | 5.60 ± 0.20 b |
|
| 0.198 ± 0.001 a | 0.967 ± 0.015 a | 7.42 ± 0.366 c | 27.66 ± 0.57 c | 5.30 ± 0.10 b |
Note: MF represents mung bean flour films; MFC represents mung bean flour film incorporated with clove oil; MFCU represents the mung bean flour film incorporated with clove oil and processed with sonication. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Different superscripts indicate significant differences.
Mechanical properties of mung bean flour-based films processed under different conditions.
| Treatments | Tensile Strength | Elongation at Break | Young’s Module |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6.601 ± 0.193 b | 13.923 ± 0.731 c | 207.91 ± 0.64 c |
|
| 6.806 ± 0.047 b | 14.523 ± 0.160 b | 223.55 ± 4.15 b |
|
| 7.285 ± 0.158 a | 15.077 ± 0.227 a | 246.64 ± 2.03 a |
Note: MF represents mung bean flour films; MFC represents mung bean flour film incorporated with clove oil; MFCU represents the mung bean flour film incorporated with clove oil and processed with sonication. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Different superscripts indicate significant differences.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of mung bean flour-based films processed under different conditions.
Phytochemical and antioxidant activities of mung bean flour-based films processed under different conditions.
| Treatments | Total Phenolic Content | Total Flavonoid Content | Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (%) | ABTS + Radical Scavenging Activity (%) | DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity | Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 17.90 ± 0.269 c | 13.63 ± 0.068 b | 68.33 ± 1.528 c | 65.00 ± 1.000 c | 55.66 ± 1.155 c | 62.00 ± 2.646 c |
|
| 47.57 ± 0.061 b | 29.17 ± 0.055 b | 80.33 ± 1.281 b | 70.00 ± 1.000 b | 75.33 ± 1.528 b | 69.00 ± 1.000 b |
|
| 51.40 ± 0.115 a | 31.87 ± 0.166 a | 84.00 ± 1.000 a | 74.00 ± 2.000 a | 79.66 ± 1.155 a | 72.33 ± 2.082 a |
Note: MF represents mung bean flour films; MFC represents mung bean flour film incorporated with clove oil; MFCU represents mung bean flour film incorporated with clove oil and prepared with ultrasonication; GAE represent gallic acid equivalents; CE presents catechin equivalents; ABTS represents 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid; DPPH represents 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Different superscripts indicate significant differences.
Antimicrobial properties of mung bean flour-based films processed under different conditions.
| Treatments | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| 6.820 ± 0.177 a | 7.593 ± 0.163 a |
|
| 5.173 ± 0.152 b | 3.747 ± 0.122 b |
|
| 4.440 ± 0.219 c | 3.090 ± 0.070 b |
Note: MF represents mung bean flour films; MFC represents mung bean flour film incorporated with clove oil; MFCU represents mung bean flour film incorporated with clove oil and prepared with sonication. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Different superscripts indicate significant differences.
Figure 3Lipid oxidation (TBARS (A), Peroxide value (B), p-anisidine value (C) and Totox value (D)) inhibition by mung bean flour-based films processed under different conditions. Note: TBARS represents Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.