| Literature DB >> 35628761 |
Yirong Wang1,2, Lijuan Han1,2, Yuxian Xia1,2, Jiaqin Xie1,2.
Abstract
The rice planthopper Sogatella furcifera is a unique vector of the southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus (SRBSDV). The feeding behavior of S. furcifera should directly affect the diffusion of this virus. In this study, we noted that the infection of Metarhizium anisopliae CQMa421 on S. furcifera disturbed the feeding behavior of this pest to SRBSDV-infected rice, from preference to non-preference. Then, we further investigated the potential targets of M. anisopliae CQMa421 on the feeding behavior of S. furcifera after 0 h, 24 h and 48 h of infection by transcriptomic analysis via Illumina deep sequencing. A total of 93.27 GB of data was collected after sequencing, from which 91,125 unigenes were annotated, including 75 newly annotated genes. There were 1380 vs. 2187 and 137 vs. 106 upregulated and downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) detected at 24 h and 48 h, respectively. The biological functions and associated metabolic processes of these genes were determined with the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases. The results suggested that major of DEGs are involved in energy metabolism, biosynthesis, immune response, the FoxO signaling pathway, the MAPK signaling pathway and apoptosis in response to the fungal infection. Noteworthily, several olfactory-related genes, including odorant receptors and odorant binding proteins, were screened from these differentially expressed genes, which played critical roles in regulating the olfactory behavior of insects. Taken together, these results provide new insights for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying fungus and host insect interaction, especially for olfactory behavior regulated by fungus.Entities:
Keywords: Metarhizium anisopliae; Sogatella furcifera; entomopathogenic fungus; feeding behavior; olfactory-related genes; pest control
Year: 2022 PMID: 35628761 PMCID: PMC9147605 DOI: 10.3390/jof8050506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1The effects of M. anisopliae on host S. furcifera feeding behavior. (A) Feeding choice of S. furcifera for SRBSDV or non-SRBSDV rice plants under random feeding test; (B) feeding choice of S. furcifera for SRBSDV or non-SRBSDV rice plants under Y-tube olfactory test; (C) after 48 h infection, the feeding choice of S. furcifera for SRBSDV or non-SRBSDV rice plants under random feeding test; (D) after 48 h infection, the feeding choice of S. furcifera for SRBSDV or non-SRBSDV rice plants under the Y-tube olfactory test. The asterisks indicate the significant difference. “*” indicates p < 0.05; “**” indicates p < 0.01 and “***” indicates p < 0.001.
Statistical summary of S. furcifera groups, after having inoculated M. anisopliae or not.
| Sample Name | Raw Reads | Raw Bases | Clean Reads | Clean Bases | Q30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T_24 h_1 | 38,699,940 | 5.80G | 35,830,030 | 5.37G | 92.91% |
| T_24 h_2 | 42,519,476 | 6.37G | 40,606,948 | 6.09G | 93.49% |
| T_24 h_3 | 38,627,148 | 5.79G | 36,601,008 | 5.49G | 93.25% |
| CK_24 h_1 | 41,683,106 | 6.25G | 39,847,928 | 5.98G | 93.70% |
| CK_24 h_2 | 44,749,802 | 6.71G | 42,760,666 | 6.41G | 93.92% |
| CK_24 h_3 | 46,649,430 | 6.99G | 44,910,818 | 6.74G | 93.08% |
| T_48 h_1 | 40,096,262 | 6.01G | 38,405,376 | 5.76G | 93.02% |
| T_48 h_2 | 42,917,082 | 6.43G | 41,055,774 | 6.16G | 93.73% |
| T_48 h_3 | 40,289,444 | 6.04G | 38,627,478 | 5.79G | 93.26% |
| CK_48 h_1 | 43,887,028 | 6.58G | 42,403,914 | 6.36G | 92.82% |
| CK_48 h_2 | 38,657,406 | 5.79G | 36,866,622 | 5.53G | 93.27% |
| CK_48 h_3 | 40,229,530 | 6.03G | 38,382,242 | 5.76G | 93.54% |
| Blank_1 | 41,866,614 | 6.27G | 40,000,444 | 6.00G | 93.20% |
| Blank_2 | 38,396,532 | 5.75G | 36,692,418 | 5.50G | 94.56% |
| Blank_3 | 43,095,904 | 6.46G | 41,381,568 | 6.21G | 94.07% |
T, M. anisopliae treatment group; CK, control group.
Figure 2The volcano plot and numbers of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of S. furcifera identified after M. anisopliae inoculation. (A) The volcano plot of DEGs at 24 h post inoculation vs. 0 h; (B) the volcano plot of DEGs at 24 h post inoculation vs. 24 h control; (C) the volcano plot of DEGs at 48 h post inoculation vs. 0 h; (D) the volcano plot of DEGs at 48 h post inoculation vs. 48 h control; and (E) the number of S. furcifera DEGs during M. anisopliae infection from 0 to 48 h.
Figure 3Gene ontology (GO) categories of S. furcifera DEGs after challenge with M. anisopliae at different periods. (A) GO categories of S. furcifera DEGs after challenge with M. anisopliae at 24 h vs. 0 h; (B) GO categories of S. furcifera DEGs after challenge with M. anisopliae at 24 h; (C) GO categories of S. furcifera DEGs after challenge with M. anisopliae at 48 h vs. 0 h; and (D) GO categories of S. furcifera DEGs after challenge with M. anisopliae at 48 h. The asterisks (*) indicate the significant enrichment of GO terms.
Figure 4Enrichment and dispersion point map of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in KEGG pathways. (A) The DEGs involved in the pathways after challenge for 24 h vs. 0 h; (B) the DEGs involved in the pathways after challenge for 24 h; (C) the DEGs involved in the pathways after challenge for 48 h vs. 0 h; (D) the DEGs involved in the pathways after challenge for 48 h. The circles in the graph indicate that the KEGG pathway with the gene number and enrichment factor (q-value, different colors) are displayed on the y and x axes, respectively.
Figure 5Transcriptomic validation by qPCR and the olfactory-related genes identification. (A) A comparison of qPCR and RNA-seq of 20 genes; (B) the DEGs involved in the regulation of host olfactory behavior at 24 h vs. 0 h; (C) the DEGs involved in the regulation of host olfactory behavior at 24 h; (D) the DEGs involved in the regulation of host olfactory behavior at 48 h vs. 0 h; and (E), the DEGs involved in the regulation of host olfactory behavior at 48 h.