| Literature DB >> 35628131 |
Juan Li1, Meiru Mao1, Jiacheng Li1, Ziteng Chen1, Ying Ji2, Jianglong Kong1, Zhijie Wang1, Jiaxin Zhang1, Yujiao Wang1, Wei Liang1, Haojun Liang1, Linwen Lv1, Qiuyang Liu1, Ruyu Yan1, Hui Yuan1, Kui Chen1, Yanan Chang1, Guogang Chen3, Gengmei Xing1.
Abstract
For developing an effective interventional approach and treatment modality for PM2.5, the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on alleviating inflammation and attenuating lung injury induced by inhalation exposure of PM2.5 were assessed in murine models. We found that daily oral administration of the active components of omega-3 fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) effectively alleviated lung parenchymal lesions, restored normal inflammatory cytokine levels and oxidative stress levels in treating mice exposed to PM2.5 (20 mg/kg) every 3 days for 5 times over a 14-day period. Especially, CT images and the pathological analysis suggested protective effects of DHA and EPA on lung injury. The key molecular mechanism is that DHA and EPA can inhibit the entry and deposition of PM2.5, and block the PM2.5-mediated cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation.Entities:
Keywords: PM2.5; docosahexaenoic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid; lung injury; omega-3 fatty acids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35628131 PMCID: PMC9140442 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23105323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1In vitro uptake studies. (A) Uptake of 100 μg/mL (PM2.5-L) and 200 μg/mL (PM2.5-H) PM2.5-Cy7 in RAW264.7 cells treated with 5 μg/mL DHA and EPA for 4 h. (B) Phagocytosis of PM2.5-Cy7 in RAW264.7 cell was observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). (C) The quantification of fluorescence intensity of PM2.5-Cy7 in (A). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * p < 0.11, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2PM2.5 biodistribution in vivo. (A) Three-dimensional fluorescence imaging after PM2.5 installation for 12 h in mice. (B) Anatomical imaging 1 h and 12 h post-PM2.5 exposure. (C) Distribution of PM2.5 fluorescence in different organs including the heart, lung, liver, spleen, and kidneys. (D) PM2.5 fluorescence intensity quantification in lung tissues. (E) Upper left panel: bright field; lower left panel: fluorescent field; right panel: merge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3DHA and EPA attenuated PM2.5-induced lung injury in mice. (A) Intratracheal administration of PM2.5 for 5 times (blue arrows). Daily gavage of EPA or DHA for 14 consecutive days. (B) Micro-CT three-dimensional reconstruction of lung tissue from mice exposed to PM2.5, and treated with DHA and EPA for 14 days, respectively. The mice in the control group were orally administered with saline. (C) Histological examination of the lung on day 14 of PM2.5 exposure. The red arrow indicated the alveolar wall’s remarkable thickening, and the green arrow showed the usual form.
Figure 4The changes of cytokines in plasma and BALF after PM2.5 exposure and treatment with different doses of DHA or EPA. (A–D) IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-10 in plasma. (E–H) IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-10 in BALF. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05. The control mice have received the oral gavage of saline without PM2.5 exposure. The mice in the corn oil group were with PM2.5 exposure and orally administered with corn oil. The MMP-9 expression in the lung after PM2.5 exposure and gavage with different doses of DHA or EPA were detected by the Western blot (I) and blot quantification (J).
Figure 5GSH and SOD in plasma and BALF after PM2.5 exposure and gavage with different doses of DHA or EPA. (A,B) GSH, SOD in plasma. (C,D) GSH, SOD in BALF. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05.
Figure 6PM2.5-induced toxicity and related mechanisms during PM2.5 exposure and omega-3 gavage.