| Literature DB >> 35627699 |
Abstract
We analyzed gender differences in the effects of child abuse and neglect experienced during adolescence on depressive symptoms and aggression in Korean adolescents using a representative sample of participants over a three-year period. We applied a latent growth model to a sample of 1797 adolescents aged 14-16 from the Korean Children and Youth Panel Survey. Our findings revealed that abuse increased depressive symptoms in early adolescence, while lowering the rate of increase in depressive symptoms over time. Neglect adversely affected depressive symptoms in boys, but not in girls. Abuse increased the initial value of aggression in girls more than in boys, but reduced the increase rate of aggression over time in girls. Neglect increased the initial value of aggression only in boys. Consequently, abuse and neglect experienced during adolescence can affect depressive symptoms and aggression in the individual differently, depending on gender. This study suggests that, in order to reduce depressive symptoms and aggression in adolescents, work should be undertaken to solve the problems of abuse and neglect, and different approaches should be taken according to the gender of the individual.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; aggression; child abuse; child neglect; depressive symptoms
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35627699 PMCID: PMC9141275 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19106160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Descriptive statistics.
| Overall | Boys | Girls |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construct | M | STD | M | STD | M | STD | |
| Depressive symptoms W5 | 1.77 | 0.57 | 1.70 | 0.55 | 1.84 | 0.58 | −4.99 *** |
| Depressive symptoms W6 | 1.77 | 0.55 | 1.70 | 0.53 | 1.85 | 0.55 | −5.92 *** |
| Depressive symptoms W7 | 1.79 | 0.55 | 1.69 | 0.54 | 1.89 | 0.55 | −7.58 *** |
| Aggression W5 | 1.94 | 0.56 | 1.93 | 0.56 | 1.96 | 0.56 | −1.00 |
| Aggression W6 | 1.92 | 0.54 | 1.90 | 0.54 | 1.95 | 0.54 | −2.03 * |
| Aggression W7 | 1.83 | 0.54 | 1.79 | 0.53 | 1.87 | 0.54 | −3.30 ** |
| Abuse W5 | 1.62 | 0.61 | 1.70 | 0.65 | 1.54 | 0.56 | 5.60 *** |
| Neglect W5 | 1.78 | 0.55 | 1.78 | 0.54 | 1.78 | 0.55 | −0.17 |
| Household income W5 | 4.79 | 2.05 | 4.74 | 2.00 | 4.85 | 2.10 | −1.09 |
| Health status W5 | 3.32 | 0.56 | 3.36 | 0.57 | 3.27 | 0.55 | 3.33 ** |
| Satisfaction with academic performance W5 | 2.56 | 0.78 | 2.59 | 0.80 | 2.52 | 0.75 | 1.99 * |
| Peer relationships W5 | 3.14 | 0.41 | 3.41 | 0.56 | 3.30 | 0.58 | −0.02 |
| Age W5 | 13.95 | 0.24 | 13.95 | 0.24 | 13.94 | 0.24 | 0.75 |
| Age W6 | 14.95 | 0.24 | 14.95 | 0.24 | 14.94 | 0.24 | 0.75 |
| Age W7 | 15.95 | 0.24 | 15.95 | 0.24 | 15.94 | 0.24 | 0.75 |
| N | 1797 | 942 | 855 | ||||
Note. W5: Wave 5, W6: Wave 6, W7: Wave 7; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Conditional LGM estimates of depressive symptoms by gender.
| Path | Boys ( | Girls ( | C.R | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE | β | SE | ||
|
| |||||
| Abuse→ICEPT | 0.215 *** | 0.025 | 0.283 *** | 0.033 | 1.649 |
| Abuse→SLOPE | −0.057 *** | 0.015 | −0.093 *** | 0.017 | −1.61 |
| Neglect→ICEPT | 0.207 *** | 0.03 | 0.219 *** | 0.034 | 0.275 |
| Neglect→SLOPE | −0.033 | 0.018 | −0.006 | 0.018 | 1.079 |
|
| |||||
| Abuse→ICEPT | 0.187 *** | 0.023 | 0.218 *** | 0.029 | 0.843 |
| Abuse→SLOPE | −0.055 *** | 0.015 | −0.082 *** | 0.017 | −1.173 |
| Neglect→ICEPT | 0.097 *** | 0.03 | 0.047 | 0.032 | −1.148 |
| Neglect→SLOPE | −0.025 | 0.019 | 0.027 | 0.019 | 1.954 |
| Household income→ICEPT | 0.014 | 0.007 | −0.001 | 0.008 | −1.424 |
| Household income→SLOPE | −0.004 | 0.005 | −0.003 | 0.005 | 0.157 |
| Health status→ICEPT | −0.139 *** | 0.026 | −0.245 *** | 0.03 | −2.617 |
| Health status→SLOPE | 0.018 | 0.017 | 0.045 * | 0.018 | 1.14 |
| Satisfaction of academic performance→ICEPT | −0.092 *** | 0.019 | −0.107 *** | 0.022 | −0.509 |
| Satisfaction of academic performance→SLOPE | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.004 | 0.013 | −0.488 |
| Peer relationships→ICEPT | −0.301 *** | 0.038 | −0.421 *** | 0.048 | −1.953 |
| Peer relationships→SLOPE | 0.019 | 0.024 | 0.1 *** | 0.028 | 2.195 |
Note. Unconstrained model fit of depressive symptoms (Step 1): 𝒳2(6) = 7.085 (p = 0.313), TLI = 0.998, CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.010; Unconstrained model fit of depressive symptoms (Step 2): 𝒳2(14) = 16.709 (p = 0.272), TLI = 0.995, CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.010; Critical ratio (C.R.) outside the range of ±1.96 means gender differences are significant at α = 0.05; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Conditional LGM estimates of aggression by gender.
| Path | Boys ( | Girls ( | C.R | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE | β | SE | ||
|
| |||||
| Abuse→ICEPT | 0.174 *** | 0.026 | 0.272 *** | 0.031 | 2.419 |
| Abuse→SLOPE | −0.006 | 0.015 | −0.063 *** | 0.017 | −2.529 |
| Neglect→ICEPT | 0.202 *** | 0.031 | 0.129 *** | 0.032 | −1.649 |
| Neglect→SLOPE | −0.045 * | 0.018 | −0.001 | 0.018 | 1.745 |
|
| |||||
| Abuse→ICEPT | 0.137 *** | 0.025 | 0.214 *** | 0.029 | 2.001 |
| Abuse→SLOPE | −0.003 | 0.015 | −0.058 *** | 0.017 | −2.405 |
| Neglect→ICEPT | 0.083 ** | 0.031 | −0.019 | 0.032 | −2.286 |
| Neglect→SLOPE | −0.034 | 0.019 | 0.013 | 0.019 | 1.743 |
| Household income→ICEPT | 0.000 | 0.008 | −0.01 | 0.008 | −0.845 |
| Household income→SLOPE | −0.003 | 0.005 | −0.003 | 0.005 | −0.057 |
| Health status→ICEPT | −0.017 | 0.028 | −0.047 | 0.03 | −0.713 |
| Health status→SLOPE | 0.001 | 0.017 | −0.001 | 0.018 | −0.055 |
| Satisfaction of academic performance→ICEPT | −0.057 ** | 0.02 | −0.056 * | 0.022 | 0.055 |
| Satisfaction of academic performance→SLOPE | 0.002 | 0.012 | −0.001 | 0.013 | −0.19 |
| Peer relationships→ICEPT | −0.399 *** | 0.04 | −0.505 *** | 0.048 | −1.692 |
| Peer relationships→SLOPE | 0.042 | 0.025 | 0.063 * | 0.028 | 0.56 |
Note. Unconstrained model fit of aggression (Step 1): 𝒳2(6) = 23.659 (p = 0.001), TLI = 0.960, CFI = 0.988, RMSEA = 0.040; Unconstrained model fit of aggression (Step 2): 𝒳2(14) = 43.609 (p < 0.001), TLI = 0.935, CFI = 0.987, RMSEA = 0.034; Critical ratio (C.R.) outside the range of ±1.96 means gender differences are significant at α = 0.05; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1Gender differences in effects of abuse and neglect on depressive symptoms. Note. W5 = wave 5, W6 = wave 6, W7 = wave 7, b = boys, g = girls, ns = not significant; *** p < 0.001. Covariates (household income, health status, satisfaction with academic performance, and peer relationships in wave 5) were controlled. Dotted lines mean gender differences in effects are not significant at α = 0.05.
Figure 2Gender differences in effects of abuse and neglect on aggression. Note. W5 = wave 5, W6 = wave 6, W7 = wave 7, b = boys, g = girls, ns = not significant; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Covariates (household income, health status, satisfaction with academic performance, and peer relationships in wave 5) were controlled. Bold lines indicate gender differences in effects are significant at α = 0.05. Dotted lines indicate gender differences in effects are not significant at α = 0.05.