| Literature DB >> 35627052 |
Ilaria Marchioni1, Isabella Taglieri1, Rosanna Dimita2,3, Barbara Ruffoni4, Angela Zinnai1,5, Francesca Venturi1,5, Chiara Sanmartin1,5, Laura Pistelli1,5.
Abstract
Edible flowers (EFs) are currently consumed as fresh products, but their shelf life can be extended by a suitable drying technique, avoiding the loss of visual quality and valuable nutraceutical properties. Begonia cucullata Willd is a common ornamental bedding plant, and its leaves and flowers are edible. In this work, B. cucullata red flowers were freeze-dried (FD) and hot-air dried (HAD) at different temperatures. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first one comparing different drying methodologies and different temperatures involving sensory characterization of EFs; therefore, a codified method for the description of the sensory profile of both fresh and dried B. cucullata was developed and validated. Phytochemical analyses highlighted the better preservation of antioxidant compounds (polyphenols, flavonoids and anthocyanins) for flowers dried at 60-70 °C. Visual quality was strongly affected by the drying treatments; in particular the color of the HAD samples significantly turned darker, whereas the FD samples exhibited a marked loss of pigmentation. Although all drying conditions led to a reduction in the hedonic indices if compared with fresh flowers, the best results in terms of organoleptic properties were obtained when the drying temperature was set to 60 or 70 °C.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; colorimetric analysis; dried flowers; freeze-drying technique; hot-air drying temperature; polyphenol content; sensory evaluation; sugars
Year: 2022 PMID: 35627052 PMCID: PMC9141419 DOI: 10.3390/foods11101481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Sensory wheel of flower analysis (XLSTAT ver. 1 April 2019).
Figure 2Visual quality of B. cucullata flowers. Fresh (a), freeze-dried (FD; b), hot-air dried (HAD) 50 °C (c), HAD 60 °C (d), HAD 70 °C (e), HAD 80 °C (f).
CIE L*a*b* color parameters of the B. cucullata flowers subjected to different postharvest treatments. Abbreviation: FD—freeze-dried; HAD—hot-air dried.
| Fresh | FD | HAD 50 °C | HAD 60 °C | HAD 70 °C | HAD 80 °C | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | *** | 34.64 b | 46.85 a | 32.3 bc | 32.48 bc | 32.28 c | 28.49 d |
| a* | *** | 44.43 a | 38.19 b | 31.87 c | 33.67 c | 35.81 bc | 22.78 d |
| b* | *** | 17.97 a | 6.99 cd | 3.45 e | 11.64 b | 5.68 d | 7.88 c |
| C* | *** | 47.93 a | 38.83 b | 32.08 c | 35.62 bc | 36.28 bc | 24.15 d |
1 Significance level *** p < 0.001, ns: not significant (p > 0.05). L* = lightness a* = green-red components; b* = blue-yellow components; C* = Chroma. In the same column, different letters indicate significant differences among samples.
CIE L*a*b* color differences ( ) among flowers samples.
|
| Fresh | FD | HAD 50 °C | HAD 60 °C | HAD 70 °C | HAD 80 °C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh flowers | 17.56 | 19.33 | 12.67 | 15.19 | 24.67 | |
| FD | 16.22 | 15.76 | 14.82 | 23.99 | ||
| HAD 50 °C | 8.39 | 4.53 | 10.82 | |||
| HAD 60 °C | 6.34 | 12.19 | ||||
| HAD 70 °C | 13.75 | |||||
| HAD 80 °C |
Figure 3Flowers’ sensory profile related to View (a), Smell (b) and Taste (c). The figures only report the parameters that showed statistically significant differences. Significance level *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. Abbreviation: FD—freeze-dried.
Figure 4Overall hedonic indices of dried flowers. Abbreviation: F—fresh flowers; FD—freeze-dried.
Determination of anthocyanins, total phenolics, total flavonoids, antioxidant activity (DPPH and FRAP assay), total soluble sugars (TSS) and pH and total acidity (TTA) in B. cucullata flowers subjected to different postharvest treatments. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Within drying treatments, different letters mean significant differences using Tukey HSD or the Mann–Whitney U tests, with a cut-off significance of p < 0.05.
| Fresh Flowers * | FD | HAD 50 °C | HAD 60 °C | HAD 70 °C | HAD 80 °C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total anthocyanins | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 5.47 ± 0.20 c | 6.34 ± 0.09 b | 8.59 ± 0.47 a | 9.35 ± 0.40 a | 4.47 ± 0.49 c |
| Total phenolics (TPC) | 1.66 ± 0.26 | 55.90 ± 4.12 a | 55.36 ± 1.82 a | 44.36 ± 2.08 ab | 48.25 ± 0.93 ab | 39.38 ± 0.31 b |
| Total flavonoids (TFC) | 0.64 ± 0.06 | 27.18 ± 3.13 a | 25.05 ± 1.14 ab | 19.91 ± 1.37 ab | 17.09 ± 0.42 b | 12.73 ± 1.40 b |
| Radical scavenging activity (DPPH assay) | 3.43 ± 0.28 | 191.06 ± 3.46 a | 131.48 ± 0.63 b | 127.78 ± 4.18 b | 128.41 ± 1.75 b | 105.47 ± 0.35 c |
| Ferric ion reducing antioxidant power (FRAP assay) | 13.33 ± 1.71 | 510.80 ± 34.18 a | 437.06 ± 18.82 b | 390.33 ± 4.92 bc | 433.53 ± 15.16 b | 349.48 ± 10.96 c |
| Total soluble sugars | 6.96 ± 0.03 | 125.70 ± 7.06 b | 109.15 ± 2.11 b | 112.70 ± 3.38 b | 171.06 ± 0.49 a | 171.25 ± 5.19 a |
| pH | 3.36 ± 0.15 | 3.39 ± 0.08 a | 3.24 ± 0.01 ab | 2.99 ± 0.08 bc | 2.92 ± 0.01 c | 2.95 ± 0.06 c |
| Total acidity (TTA) (mEq citric acid/g DW) | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 1.63 ± 0.26 c | 1.69 ± 0.32 c | 2.69 ± 0.10 b | 3.19 ± 0.16 ab | 3.47 ± 0.07 a |
* Fresh flower’s data are reported as gFW−1. (fresh weight). Abbreviation: FD = freeze-dried; HAD = hot-air dried; DW = dried weight; GLU = glucose; CE = (+)-catechin equivalents; GAE: gallic acid equivalents.