| Literature DB >> 35627025 |
Diana De Santis1, Katya Carbone2, Stefania Garzoli3, Valentina Laghezza Masci1, Giovanni Turchetti1.
Abstract
The leaves of Rubus idaeus L., a by-product of the fruit food industry, are a known source of bioactive molecules, although the chemical composition has only been partially investigated. The main objective of this study was to examine the biological activities and the chemical composition of the extract of leaves of R. idaeus (RH), obtained by steam distillation (SD). The antioxidant capacity; the total phenolic content (TPC); the cytotoxic activity against tumor cell lines; and the antibacterial activity, in addition to the study of the chemical fingerprinting, carried out by Gas/Chromatography-Mass-Spectrometry (GC/MS) and Headspace (HS)-GC/MS, were established. The extract showed a strong antioxidant capacity and a modest antibacterial activity against two bacterial strains, as well as significant cytotoxic activity against tumor cell lines (Caco-2 and HL60) and being proliferative on healthy cells. Many of the GC-identified volatile molecules (1,8-cineol, β-linalool, geraniol, caryophyllene, τ-muurolol, citral, α-terpineol, 3- carene, α-terpinen-7-al, etc.) can explain most of the biological properties exhibited by the extract of R. idaeus L. The high biological activity of the RH and the high compatibility with the various matrices suggest good prospects for this extract, both in the food and cosmetic fields or in dietary supplements for improving human health.Entities:
Keywords: GC/MS profile; antibacterial activity; radical scavenging capacity; raspberry leaves; steam-distillation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35627025 PMCID: PMC9140405 DOI: 10.3390/foods11101455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Total volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles for the distillate of raspberry leaves by HS-GC/MS. LRI: Linear Retention Indices measured on a polar column; LRIlit: Linear Retention Indices from literature.
| Peak | LRI | LRIlit | Component | Class | Amount (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 915 | 914 | butanal, 3-methyl |
| 0.2 |
| 2 | 970 | 968 | pentanal |
| 2.9 |
| 3 | 995 | 993 | 2,3-butanedione |
| 0.4 |
| 4 | 1025 | 1022 | 2-butanol |
| 0.4 |
| 5 | 1093 | 1095 | 1-propanol, 2-methyl- |
| 0.4 |
| 6 | 1148 | 1146 | 3-carene |
| 16.3 |
| 7 | 1160 | 1157 | β-myrcene |
| 0.1 |
| 8 | 1200 | 1198 | limonene |
| 1.0 |
| 9 | 1210 | 1207 | 1-butanol, 2-methyl- |
| 1.6 |
| 10 | 1214 | 1209 | 1,8-cineole |
| 50.8 |
| 11 | 1298 | 1296 | 2-heptanol |
| 10.3 |
| 12 | 1395 | 1389 | 3-hexen-1-ol |
| 1.5 |
| 13 | 1398 | 1394 | 2-hexen-1-ol |
| 0.2 |
| 14 | 1472 | 1469 | 5-hepten-2-ol, 6-methyl- |
| 0.9 |
| 15 | 1531 | 1528 | camphor |
| 2.9 |
| 16 | 1585 | 1586 | hotrienol |
| 0.2 |
| 17 | 1618 | 1619 | terpinyl acetate |
| 3.7 |
| 18 | 1676 | 1675 | α-terpineol |
| 5.2 |
| 19 | 2014 | 2011 | methyl eugenol |
| 0.5 |
| Total | 99.0 | ||||
Figure 1Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of a hexan extract of raspberry leaves steam-distilled.
Volatile fraction composition of raspberry leaves hydrolate hexanoic extract determined by GC/MS. 1 LRI: Linear Retention Indices.
| Peak | LRI 1 | Compound | Class | Amount (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 829 | 2-hexenal |
| 8.79 |
| 2 | 866 | 2-heptanone |
| 1.49 |
| 3 | 876 | 2-hexanol-3-methyl |
| 1.59 |
| 4 | 914 | 4-heptanol-3-ethyl |
| 1.56 |
| 5 | 924 | 3-hexanol-5-methyl |
| 1.26 |
| 6 | 969 | 2,4 heptadienal |
| 3.13 |
| 7 | 984 | 1,8-cineole |
| 2.47 |
| 8 | 1029 | 2-nonanone |
| 6.88 |
| 9 | 1035 | β-linalool |
| 6.15 |
| 10 | 1135 | geraniol |
| 4.45 |
| 11 | 1145 | citral |
| 1.00 |
| 12 | 1162 | unknown |
| 1.68 |
| 13 | 1195 | methyl salicylate |
| 1.94 |
| 14 | 1198 | n-decanoic acid |
| 1.15 |
| 15 | 1210 | unknown |
| 6.71 |
| 16 | 1256 | unknown |
| 2.80 |
| 17 | 1269 | unknown |
| 2.11 |
| 18 | 1281 | α-terpinen-7-al |
| 1.19 |
| 19 | 1289 | unknown |
| 1.15 |
| 20 | 1308 | unknown |
| 6.65 |
| 21 | 1352 | dodecanoic acid |
| 1.37 |
| 22 | 1410 | τ-muurolol |
| 1.09 |
| 23 | 1437 | unknown |
| 3.30 |
| 24 | 1466 | caryophyllene |
| 2.61 |
| Total identified | 72.52 | |||
Figure 2Antiproliferative activity after 48 h of treatment with RH tested on MCF10A, HL60, and Caco2 cell lines. The standard deviation is represented by black bars. Bars with different letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 among cell lines, according to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple comparisons applying the Tukey test.
Antibacterial activity of 10 µL of pure RH and 10 µL of Gentamicin (1 mg/mL) evaluated using the agar diffusion method. NE: No Effect.
| Agar Diffusion Method | RH (10 µL) | Gentamicin (10 µL) |
|---|---|---|
|
| NE | 24.8 ± 0.4 |
|
| NE | 26 ± 6 |
|
| NE | 22 ± 1 |
|
| 7.67 ± 1 | 22 ± 3 |
|
| 12 ± 3 | 34 ± 2 |
Total Phenols Content (TPC), expressed as mg GAE 100 mL−1, and the antioxidant capacity of RH in three different tests: DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP. Antioxidant values are expressed as µM of Trolox Equivalent 100 mL−1 of RH used in the assay.
| TPC | DPPH | ABTS | FRAP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6.25 ± 0.54 | 6746 ± 555 | 13.57 ± 0.56 | 307.48 ± 3.08 |