| Literature DB >> 35627009 |
Jingwen Sun1,2, Runlin Wu1,2, Benlun Hu1,2, Caihua Jia1,2,3, Jianhua Rong1,2,3, Shanbai Xiong1,2,3, Ru Liu1,2,3.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of konjac glucomannan (KGM) on oil absorption and the formation of safety hazard factors in fried battered fish nuggets by measuring advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and acrylamide contents. Other physicochemical properties were determined to explore the reason for oil absorption and formation of safety hazard factors. The acrylamide was found mainly in the crust. The addition of 0.8% KGM could significantly reduce the acrylamide content (p < 0.05). For the battered sample, the AGEs content was far lower than the unbattered. The addition of 0.8% KGM could significantly reduce the AGEs content in the inner layer (p < 0.05). The microstructure showed that the sample with 0.8% KGM had the most compact crust. The compact crust reduced oil and malondialdehyde contents. Combined with the other indicators, the inhibitory effect of 0.8% KGM on acrylamide was closely related with the decreased extent of oil oxidation and Maillard reaction in the samples with 0.8% KGM. The inhibitory effect of 0.8% KGM on AGEs might originate from its lower oil content.Entities:
Keywords: acrylamide; advanced glycation end products; fried battered fish nuggets; konjac glucomannan; oil content
Year: 2022 PMID: 35627009 PMCID: PMC9141061 DOI: 10.3390/foods11101437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Battering Recipe.
| KGM Addition Ratio (%) | Wheat Flour (%) | Modified Starch (%) | Baking Powder (%) | Salt (%) | KGM (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 58 | 40 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 0.4 | 57.6 | 40 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.4 |
| 0.8 | 57.2 | 40 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.8 |
| 1.2 | 56.8 | 40 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| 1.6 | 56.4 | 40 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
Figure 1Moisture content (A), oil content (B), and battering rate (C) of fried battered fish nuggets with different proportions of KGM. Note: Different capital letters indicate that there are significant differences between different conditions (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate that there are significant differences between the crust and the inner layer in the same condition (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Oil distribution of fried battered fish nuggets with different proportions of KGM. (A) Indicates the Sudan Red staining of sample. (a–e) indicate the images of samples under 0% KGM, 0.4% KGM, 0.8% KGM, 1.2% KGM and 1.6% KGM, respectively. (B) indicates the SO, PSO, STO contents of sample. (C) indicates the oil penetration depth of sample. Note: Different capital letters indicate that there are significant differences between different conditions (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate that there are significant differences between the crust and the inner layer in the same condition (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Microstructure (A) and the pore equivalent diameter (B) of the crust with different proportions of KGM. Note: different capital letters indicate that there are significant differences between different conditions (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Malondialdehyde content of fried battered fish nuggets with different proportions of KGM. Note: Different capital letters indicate that there are significant differences between different conditions (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate that there are significant differences between the crust and the inner layer in the same condition (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Nonfluorescent, fluorescent AGEs and acrylamide contents of fried fish nuggets with KGM. Note: Different capital letters indicate that there are significant differences between different conditions (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate that there are significant differences between the crust and the inner layer in the same condition (p < 0.05).