| Literature DB >> 32414113 |
Montserrat Martínez-Pineda1, Cristina Yagüe-Ruiz1, Antonio Vercet1.
Abstract
Tempura-fried vegetables are widely consumed and are greatly appreciated because of their characteristic dry and crispy crust, flavor and a golden-brown color. This study examined the effect of slice thickness, frying time and partial ingredient substitution in tempura batter with maltodextrin, ethanol, baking powder and cornflour on the rheological characteristics, moisture, oil uptake, color, texture and sensory characteristics of tempura-fried zucchini. The results showed an improved golden-brown coloring of the crust without affecting oil uptake when maltodextrin was included in the batter formulation. Moreover, dough viscosity and % pick-up lowered with maltodextrin addition. The partial substitution of water and wheat flour with ethanol, cornflour and baking powder resulted in a crispier and rougher crust that remained more stable over time but with less moisture and higher oil uptake. The substitution of certain tempura batter ingredients depending on the desired purpose could represent an interesting strategy to improve the quality of battered fried vegetables.Entities:
Keywords: coating; crispiness; ethanol; hydrocolloid; maltodextrin; oil; organoleptic characteristics; tempura-batter
Year: 2020 PMID: 32414113 PMCID: PMC7278784 DOI: 10.3390/foods9050626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Comparison of the coating batter formulations.
| Coating Batters | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Batter Ingredients | Standard Batter (SB) | Maltodextrin Batter (MB) | Ethanol Batter (EB) |
| Wheat Flour (g) | 80 | 60 | 50 |
| Corn Flour (g) | - | - | 30 |
| Maltodextrin (g) | - | 20 | - |
| Mineral Water at 15 °C (mL) | 125 | 125 | 75 |
| Salt (g) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sugar (g) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Ethanol (g) | - | - | 50 |
| Baking Powder (g) | - | - | 5 |
Rheological characteristics of the different batter formulations fitted to the Herschel–Bulkley model.
| Coating Batter | Yield Stress (so) | Consistency Index (Keq) | Flow Index (n) | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SB | 219.30 ± 25.10 a | 0.40 ± 0.37 a | 1.42 ± 0.29 a | 0.991 |
| MB | 133.70 ± 13.30 b | 0.11 ± 0.06 b | 1.41 ± 0.09 a | 0.981 |
| EB | 103.60 ± 10.47 c | 5.68 ± 1.82 c | 0.84 ± 0.09 b | 0.997 |
SB: standard batter; MB: maltodextrin batter; EB: ethanol batter. Mean values ± standard deviations. Letters in each column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) (n = 24).
Differences in the pick-up, moisture, dry matter, final oil content and color of samples prepared with different coating batters and conditions.
| Coating Batter | Time Frying (s) | Slice Thickness (mm) | Pick-up (%) | Moisture (%) | Oil Content (%) | Color | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | ||||||
| SB | 180 | 4.25 | 29.8 ± 1.2 a | 64.0 ± 1.2 a | 15.3 ± 0.3 a | 78.8 ± 1.7 a | -0.5 ± 0.3 a | 26.3 ± 2.1 a |
| SB | 260 | 4.25 | 31.3 ± 0.9 a | 58.2 ± 0.9 a | 17.8 ± 1,4 a | 75.9 ± 1.8 a | 4.3 ± 1.4 b | 34.0 ± 1.9 b |
| SB | 360 | 4.25 | 32.2 ± 1.0 a | 48.2 ± 4.3b | 23.6 ± 2.4 b | 71.1 ± 3.4 b | 6.7 ± 1.3 c | 31.3 ± 3.7 b |
| SB | 260 | 2.25 | 40.7 ± 3.2 b | 39.2 ± 3.6 c | 27.3 ± 2.4 b | 76.0 ± 1,9 a | 3.8 ± 0.8 b,d | 31.4 ± 2.2 b |
| SB | 260 | 3.00 | 40.2 ± 1.8 b | 45.7 ± 2.3b,c | 23.7 ± 1.5 b | 76.0 ± 1.8 a | 3.2 ± 0.6 b,d | 33.6 ± 1.5 b |
| SB | 260 | 4.25 | 31.3 ± 0.9 a | 58.2 ± 0.9 a | 17.8 ± 1.4 a | 75.9 ± 1.8 a | 4.3 ± 1.4 b | 34.0 ± 1.9 b |
| SB | 260 | 4.25 | 31.3 ± 0.9 a | 58.2 ± 0.9 a | 17.8 ± 1.4 a | 75.9 ± 1.8 a | 4.3 ± 1.4 b | 34.0 ± 1.9 b |
| MB | 260 | 4.25 | 17.9 ± 0.7 c | 59.5 ± 2.2 a | 15.8 ± 2.2 a | 70.4 ± 3.7 b | 6.0 ± 1.5 c | 32.1 ± 1.8 b |
| EB | 260 | 4.25 | 28.5 ± 1.3 d | 41.2 ± 3.7 b,c | 36.9 ± 0.3 c | 77.6 ± 1.3 a | 2.7 ± 0.8 d | 31.7 ± 1.9 b |
SB: standard batter; MB: maltodextrin batter; EB: ethanol batter. Mean values ± standard deviations. Letters in each column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Sample sizes were as follows: pick-up measurement, n = 30; measurement of moisture, dry matter and oil content, n = 9; color analysis, n = 12.
Figure 1External appearance of different tempura batter zucchini samples after frying during 260 s at 170 °C. SB: standard batter; MB: maltodextrin batter; EB: ethanol batter.
Results of the texture analysis after instrumental analysis of samples with different coating batters.
| Coating Batter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (min) | SB | MB | EB | |
| Force (Kg) | 0 | 1.6 ± 0.2 a,* | 2.3 ± 0.3 b,* | 1.1 ± 0.2 c,* |
| 30 | 0.2 ± 0.0 a,† | 1.8 ± 0.2 b,† | 1.4 ± 0.2 c,† | |
| Area (Kg·s) | 0 | 6.9 ± 1.3 a,* | 5.7 ± 0.7 a * | 8.0 ± 0.9 b,* |
| 30 | 1.0 ± 0.4 a,† | 4.1 ± 0.7 b,† | 7.3 ± 0.9 c,* | |
| Count Peaks | 0 | 29.0 ± 4.2 a,* | 26.0 ± 6.7 a,* | 38.6 ± 8.3 b,* |
| 30 | 2.2 ± 1.6 a,† | 16.7 ± 3.5 b,* | 26.8 ± 5.5 c,† | |
SB: standard batter; MB: maltodextrin batter; EB: ethanol batter. Mean values ± standard deviations. Different symbols (*,†) in each column indicate significant differences between time points within each batter type (n = 15). Different lowercase letters (a,b,c) in each row indicate significant differences between batter types at the same timepoint (n = 15).
Figure 2Results of the sensory analysis of the external characteristics of fried samples (n = 30). SB: standard batter; MB: maltodextrin batter; EB: ethanol batter. Color SEM = 1.02; Color homogeneity SEM = 1.01; Roughness SEM = 0.92; Batter layer homogeneity SEM = 0.89; Sample integrity SEM = 0.72; Batter layer/product ratio SEM = 0.90. Significant differences between samples are expressed by * p < 0,05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Texture and flavor characteristics of fried samples as assessed by sensory analysis immediately and 30 min after sample preparation.
| SB | MB | EB | SEM |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | ||||||
| 0 min | 5.52 a,* | 5.33 a,* | 7.86 b,* | 0.45 | 0.018 | 0.1024 |
| 30 min | 5.66 a,* | 4.17 a,* | 6.13 a,† | 0.35 | 0.077 | |
|
| 0.531 | 0.295 | 0.020 | |||
| Crispness | ||||||
| 0 min | 9.72 a,* | 7.34 b,* | 11.21 c,* | 0.60 | 0.0002 | 0.3637 |
| 30 min | 8.69 a,† | 7.96 a,* | 9.49 a,† | 0.30 | 0.218 | |
|
| 0.0018 | 0.895 | 0.030 | |||
| Juiciness | ||||||
| 0 min | 9.92 a,* | 8.98 a,* | 8.84 a,* | 0.40 | 0.548 | 0.8943 |
| 30 min | 9.92 a,* | 8.43 a,* | 8.32 a,* | 0.45 | 0.307 | |
|
| 0.740 | 0.522 | 0.691 | |||
| Characteristic flavor intensity | ||||||
| 0 min | 8.24 a,* | 9.76 a,* | 5.59 b,* | 0.75 | 0.036 | 0.222 |
| 30 min | 8.05 a,* | 9.25 a,* | 8.01 a,* | 0.55 | 0.321 | |
|
| 0.268 | 0.747 | 0.355 | |||
| Strange flavour | ||||||
| 0 min | 0.57 a,* | 1.00 a,* | 5.29 b,* | 0.75 | <0.0001 | 0.7183 |
| 30 min | 0.44 a,* | 0.95 a,* | 4.03 b,* | 0.78 | 0.002 | |
|
| 0.640 | 0.863 | 0.379 | |||
| Oiliness | ||||||
| 0 min | 7.84 a,* | 7.92 a,* | 10.51 b,* | 0.76 | 0.003 | 0.2201 |
| 30 min | 8.48 a,* | 8.98 a,* | 8.92 a,* | 0.15 | 0.807 | |
|
| 0.565 | 0.252 | 0.088 |
SB: standard batter; MB: maltodextrin batter; EB: ethanol batter. Data show mean values and standard error of the mean (SEM). Different symbols (*,†) in each column indicate significant differences between time points within each batter type (n = 30). Different lowercase letters (a,b,c) in each row indicate significant differences between batter types at the same timepoint (n = 30).