| Literature DB >> 35626739 |
Brooks Hopkins1, Justin Fisher1, Meiping Chang2, Xiaoyan Tang2, Zhimei Du2, William J Kelly1, Zuyi Huang1.
Abstract
The growth of T cells ex vivo for the purpose of T cell therapies is a rate-limiting step in the overall process for cancer patients to achieve remission. Growing T cells is a fiscally-, time-, and resource-intensive process. Cytokines have been shown to accelerate the growth of T cells, specifically IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15. Here a design of experiments was conducted to optimize the growth rate of different naïve and memory T cell subsets using combinations of cytokines. Mathematical models were developed to study the impact of IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 on the growth of T cells. The results show that CD4+ and CD8+ naïve T cells grew effectively using moderate IL-2 and IL-7 in combination, and IL-7, respectively. CD4+ and CD8+ memory cells favored moderate IL-2 and IL-15 in combination and moderate IL-7 and IL-15 in combination, respectively. A statistically significant interaction was observed between IL-2 and IL-7 in the growth data of CD4+ naïve T cells, while the interaction between IL-7 and IL-15 was found for CD8+ naïve T cells. The important genes and related signaling pathways and metabolic reactions were identified from the RNA sequencing data for each of the four subsets stimulated by each of the three cytokines. This systematic investigation lays the groundwork for studying other T cell subsets.Entities:
Keywords: IL-15; IL-2; IL-7; RNA-sequencing; T cell subsets; T cell therapy; fuzzy-model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35626739 PMCID: PMC9139303 DOI: 10.3390/cells11101701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
The keys and concentrations of IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 were used in the experiments.
| Condition | Key | IL-2 (ng/mL) | IL-7 (ng/mL) | IL-15 (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | no cytokines | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 000 | 10 | 1.5 | 10 |
| 3 | 100 | 33 | 1.5 | 10 |
| 4 | 200 | 60 | 1.5 | 10 |
| 5 | 010 | 10 | 36 | 10 |
| 6 | 020 | 10 | 80 | 10 |
| 7 | 001 | 10 | 1.5 | 36 |
| 8 | 002 | 10 | 1.5 | 80 |
| 9 | 110 | 33 | 36 | 10 |
| 10 | 101 | 33 | 1.5 | 36 |
| 11 | 011 | 10 | 36 | 36 |
| 12 | 220 | 60 | 80 | 10 |
| 13 | 202 | 60 | 1.5 | 80 |
| 14 | 022 | 10 | 80 | 80 |
| 15 | 111 | 33 | 36 | 36 |
| 16 | 222 | 60 | 80 | 80 |
Figure 1Average (n = 3) fold-change plots for all T cell subsets and corresponding conditions: (A) naïve CD4+ T cells, (B) naïve CD8+ T cells, (C) memory CD4+ T cells, (D) memory CD8+ T cells. The X-axis represents each experimental condition. For example Index 0, 1, and 2 represents the minimum (low), the medium (middle) and maximum (high) level for each cytokine as shown in Table 1, with 0 standing for 10 ng/mL (IL-2), 1.5 ng/mL (IL-7), and 10 ng/mL (IL-15); 1 standing for 33 ng/mL (IL-2), 36 ng/mL (IL-7), 36 ng/mL (IL-15); 2 standing for 60 ng/mL (IL-2), 80 ng/mL (IL-7), and 80 ng/mL (IL-15). The “no cytokines” condition in Table 1 is denoted here by “PC” for the control condition. For example, “010” would represent low IL-2 concentration, moderate IL-7 con-centration, and low IL-15 concentration. These concentrations were selected on the basis of our previous work [14] and literature review.
p-values of statistical significance for a stimulus on each T cell subset.
| Stimulus | CD4+ Naïve | CD4+ Memory | CD8+ Naïve | CD8+ Memory | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-2 | X | 0.000457 | 0.231 | 0.2338 | 0.9533 | |||
| IL-7 | X | 0.003395 | 0.828 | 0.5216 | 0.6237 | |||
| IL-15 | 0.829209 | 0.221 | 0.9788 | 0.4289 | ||||
| IL-2/IL-7 | 0.076981 | 0.944 | 0.1731 | 0.0654 | ||||
| IL-2/IL-15 | 0.347061 | 0.772 | 0.8352 | 0.7763 | ||||
| IL-7/IL-15 | X | 0.008359 | 0.196 | X | 0.0141 | 0.6194 | ||
| IL-2/IL-7/IL-15 | X | 0.012759 | 0.444 | X | 0.0186 | X | 0.0126 |
Figure 2(A) CD4+ naïve T cells response to highest IL-2 concentration (condition “200”); (B) CD4+ naive T cells response to highest IL-7 concentration (i.e., condition “020”); (C) CD4+ naive T cells response to highest IL-15 concentration (i.e., condition “002)”; (D) CD4+ memory T cell response to highest IL-2 concentration; (E) CD4+ memory T cell response to highest IL-7 concentration; (F) CD4+ memory T cell response to highest IL-15 concentration; (G) CD8+ naïve T cell response to highest IL-2 concentration; (H) CD8+ naïve T cell response to highest IL-7 concentration; (I) CD8+ naïve T cell response to highest IL-15 concentration; (J) CD8+ memory T cell response to highest IL-2 concentration, (K) CD8+ memory T cell response to highest IL-7 concentration; (L) CD8+ memory T cell response to highest IL-15 concentration.
Figure 3Example pathways regulated by IL-2 in CD4+ naïve T cells (A) and CD8+ naïve T cells (B). These figures were generated in the software Metacore. The meaning of these icons can be found in Metacore. Further explanation of the key legend is explained in Supplementary Material S6.
Figure 4Overlapping views of shared genes that were significantly up/down-regulated by cytokines for different T cell subsets.