Ahmed Jibril Abdi1,2, Bo Mussmann1,3, Alistair Mackenzie4, Oke Gerke1,5, Gitte Maria Jørgensen3, Thor Eriksen Bechsgaard3, Janni Jensen1,3, Lone Brunshøj Olsen3, Poul Erik Andersen1. 1. Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark. 2. Department of Clinical Engineering, Region of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark. 3. Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark. 4. National Coordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in the Figure 2 on page nine of the paper. Figures 2 and 3 are duplicated, and the corrected version of Figure 2 is missing. This correct figure appears below. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Figure 2
VGA estimated marginal mean comparison across the imaging systems and image quality criteria for (a) the chest PA projection and (b) the chest LAT projection.