| Literature DB >> 35626299 |
Mihail Zemba1, Otilia-Maria Dumitrescu2, Alina-Cristina Stamate3, Ileana Ramona Barac1, Calin Petru Tataru1, Daniel Constantin Branisteanu4.
Abstract
The main objective of the article was to assess the surgical outcome of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in patients presenting with glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. We conducted a retrospective study that included 26 eyes of 26 patients who presented with glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty, and who were treated using micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation between January 2017 and December 2020. The surgeries were performed using the Iridex Cyclo G6 MicroPulse P3 Probe. The intraocular pressure, mean number of antiglaucoma medications, visual acuity, corneal status, and postoperative complications were analyzed. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. The success rate after 12 months was 76.9%. The baseline median intraocular pressure was 29 mm Hg and decreased to 18 mm Hg after 12 months. The median number of antiglaucoma medications was also reduced from three preoperatively to one after one year. In seven cases (29.92%), the visual acuity decreased and, in four cases (15.38%), the corneal graft was not transparent. We concluded that micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation is an effective and safe method for the treatment of glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty.Entities:
Keywords: glaucoma; micropulse; postkeratoplasty; transscleral cyclophotocoagulation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35626299 PMCID: PMC9139499 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Baseline patient characteristics.
| Patient | Gender | Age (Years) | Reason for PK | Cause of IOP Rise | Previous Surgery | Lens | Graft Status (Clear) | Follow-Up Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 72 | BK | PreG, PAS | CE, Trab | PC-IOL | No | 12 |
| 2 | M | 68 | BK | PreG, ST | CE | PC-IOL | Yes | 12 |
| 3 | F | 65 | FCD | PreG, ST | CE, Trab | PC-IOL | No | 15 |
| 4 | M | 49 | PTL | PAS | WC, CE | SF-IOL | Yes | 15 |
| 5 | F | 69 | BK | PB, PAS | CE, AV | SF-IOL | Yes | 12 |
| 6 | F | 71 | BK | PB, PAS | CE, AV | SF-IOL | Yes | 15 |
| 7 | M | 80 | BK | PAS | CE, Trab | PC-IOL | Yes | 18 |
| 8 | F | 73 | BK | PreG, ST | CE | PC-IOL | No | 12 |
| 9 | M | 25 | BK | ST | CE | PC-IOL | Yes | 12 |
| 10 | F | 64 | BK | PAS, ST | CE, Trab, AV | PC-IOL | Yes | 15 |
| 11 | M | 59 | BCU | PAS; Chr.Inf. | CE | PC-IOL | No | 18 |
| 12 | M | 55 | GCD | ST | None | Phakic | Yes | 24 |
| 13 | F | 78 | FCD | PreG, ST | None | Phakic | Yes | 12 |
| 14 | M | 31 | HK | Chr.Infl. | None | Phakic | Yes | 12 |
| 15 | F | 66 | BK | ST | CE, Trab-M | PC-IOL | No | 24 |
| 16 | F | 75 | BCU | PAS, CI | CE | PC-IOL | Yes | 12 |
| 17 | M | 70 | BK | PreG, ST | CE | PC-IOL | Yes | 15 |
| 18 | F | 29 | BK | ST, Aphakia | CE | Aphakic | No | 15 |
| 19 | M | 44 | HK | Chr.Infl., PAS | None | Phakic | Yes | 12 |
| 20 | F | 77 | BK | ST | CE | PC-IOL | Yes | 12 |
| 21 | M | 71 | BK | PreG, ST, PAS | PV, CE, SO, AV | PC-IOL | Yes | 15 |
| 22 | M | 69 | PTL | PAS | WC, CE, PI | PC-IOL | Yes | 18 |
| 23 | M | 63 | BK | PAS, RI | PV, CE | PC-IOL | No | 15 |
| 24 | M | 54 | PTL | PAS, ST | WC, Trab-M | Phakic | Yes | 12 |
| 25 | F | 70 | BK | PreG, ST | CE | PC-IOL | Yes | 12 |
| 26 | M | 62 | BK | PAS, RI | PV, SO, CE | PC-IOL | No | 12 |
AV = anterior vitrectomy, BK = bullous keratopathy, BCU = bacterial corneal ulcer, CE = cataract extraction, Chr.Infl. = chronic inflammation, F = female, FCD = Fuchs corneal dystrophy, GCD = granular corneal dystrophy, HK = herpetic keratitis, M = male, PAS = peripheral anterior synechia, PB = pupillary block, PC-IOL = posterior chamber intraocular lens, PI = peripheral iridectomy, PreG = preexisting glaucoma; PTL = posttraumatic leukoma, PV = posterior vitrectomy, RI = rubeosis iridis, SF-IOL = scleral fixated intraocular lens, SO = silicone oil tamponade, ST = steroid treatment, Trab = trabeculectomy, Trab-M = trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C, WC = wound closure.
Evolution of IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications, and acetazolamide usage.
| Parameter/Time | IOP (Median (IQR)) | Medication (Median (IQR)) | Acetazolamide Usage (Nr., %) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 29 (26–32) | 3 (2–3) | 12 (46.2%) |
| 1 month | 19 (16–21.25) | 2 (0.75–3) | 2 (7.7%) |
| 3 months | 17 (15.75–19.25) | 1.5 (0–2) | 1 (3.8%) |
| 6 months | 16.5 (13.5–20.5) | 1.5 (0–3) | 3 (11.5%) |
| 9 months | 16 (13.75–18.25) | 2 (0–3) | 4 (15.4%) |
| 12 months | 18 (16–20.25) | 1 (0.75–3) | 3 (11.5%) |
|
| <0.001 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 ** |
* Related samples’ Friedman’s two-way analysis of ranks, ** related samples’ Cochran’s Q test.
Figure 1Box-plot representation of the evolution of the intraocular pressure. “*”, “o” represent extreme values (outliers): “*” represents values that are smaller than Q1 (the first percentile) minus 3 times the IQR or greater than Q3 (the third percentile) plus 3 times the IQR; “o” represents values that are smaller than Q1 (the first percentile) minus 1.5 times the IQR or greater than Q3 (the third percentile) plus 3 times the IQR.
Figure 2Box-plot representation for the evolution of medication usage. “o” represents an extreme value (outlier) that is smaller than Q1 (the first percentile) minus 1.5 times the IQR or greater than Q3 (the third percentile) plus 3 times the IQR.
Figure 3Evolution of acetazolamide usage.
Evolution of BCVA and the corneal status.
| Patient | Preoperative BCVA | BCVA after 12 Months | Clear Graft after Baseline | Clear Graft after |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HM | HM | No | No |
| 2 | 6/60 | 6/10 | Yes | Yes |
| 3 | CF | HM | No | No |
| 4 | 6/20 | 6/20 | Yes | Yes |
| 5 | 6/60 | 6/10 | Yes | Yes |
| 6 | CF | HM | Yes | No |
| 7 | 6/30 | 6/30 | Yes | Yes |
| 8 | CF | 6/120 | No | Yes |
| 9 | 6/30 | 6/30 | Yes | Yes |
| 10 | CF | CF | Yes | Yes |
| 11 | CF | HM | No | No |
| 12 | 6/15 | 6/15 | Yes | Yes |
| 13 | 6/20 | 6/20 | Yes | Yes |
| 14 | 6/120 | CF | Yes | No |
| 15 | CF | CF | No | No |
| 16 | 6/30 | 6/30 | Yes | Yes |
| 17 | 6/60 | 6/60 | Yes | Yes |
| 18 | HM | HM | No | No |
| 19 | 6/20 | 6/20 | Yes | Yes |
| 20 | CF | HM | Yes | No |
| 21 | 6/120 | CF | Yes | No |
| 22 | 6/20 | 6/20 | Yes | Yes |
| 23 | HM | LP | No | No |
| 24 | 6/30 | 6/30 | Yes | Yes |
| 25 | 6/60 | 6/60 | Yes | Yes |
| 26 | HM | LP | No | No |
CF = counting fingers, HM = hand motion perception, LP = light perception.