| Literature DB >> 35625555 |
Jerry O Adeyemi1, Ayodeji O Oriola1, Damian C Onwudiwe2,3, Adebola O Oyedeji1.
Abstract
The vastness of metal-based nanoparticles has continued to arouse much research interest, which has led to the extensive search and discovery of new materials with varying compositions, synthetic methods, and applications. Depending on applications, many synthetic methods have been used to prepare these materials, which have found applications in different areas, including biology. However, the prominent nature of the associated toxicity and environmental concerns involved in most of these conventional methods have limited their continuous usage due to the desire for more clean, reliable, eco-friendly, and biologically appropriate approaches. Plant-mediated synthetic approaches for metal nanoparticles have emerged to circumvent the often-associated disadvantages with the conventional synthetic routes, using bioresources that act as a scaffold by effectively reducing and stabilizing these materials, whilst making them biocompatible for biological cells. This capacity by plants to intrinsically utilize their organic processes to reorganize inorganic metal ions into nanoparticles has thus led to extensive studies into this area of biochemical synthesis and analysis. In this review, we examined the use of several plant extracts as a mediating agent for the synthesis of different metal-based nanoparticles (MNPs). Furthermore, the associated biological properties, which have been suggested to emanate from the influence of the diverse metabolites found in these plants, were also reviewed.Entities:
Keywords: biological properties; metabolite; metal-based nanoparticles; phytochemicals; plant extracts
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35625555 PMCID: PMC9138950 DOI: 10.3390/biom12050627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Different reported synthetic approaches for metal-based nanoparticles. Redrawn from [21], with permission from Elsevier (Copyright 2022).
Figure 2Selected possible constituents of plant extract responsible for the bio-reduction of the metal salts during the synthetic preparation. Redrawn from [34,35], with permission from Elsevier (Copyright 2022).
Figure 3Green synthesis scheme for Au, Ag, and Au–Ag nanoparticles. Redrawn from [50], with permission from Elsevier (Copyright 2022).
Examples of metal-based nanoparticles synthesized using plant extracts.
| Type of MNPs | Conditions | Properties | Plants | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | 25 to 95 °C | 15 to 50 nm, cubic | [ | |
| Au | 25 °C | ~100 nm spherical | [ | |
| Au | 25 °C | 5–85 irregular, rod shape | [ | |
| Ag | 25 °C | 35 nm, triangular |
| [ |
| Au | 25 to 95 °C | 15 to 25 nm, spherical | [ | |
| Ag | 25 to 95 °C | 40 nm spherical | [ | |
| Ag | 30 to 95 °C | 13 to 27 nm spherical | [ | |
| Ag | 37 °C | 20 to 30 nm, spherical | [ | |
| Ag | 95 oC | 15 to 90 nm spherical |
| [ |
| Ag/Au | 25 °C | 50 nm | [ | |
| Cu | 25 | 20 to 110 spherical | [ | |
| Pb | 80 °C | 16 to 20 nm, spherical | [ | |
| Fe2+ | 25 to 95 °C | 50 nm spherical | [ | |
| In2O3 | 60°C | 5 to 50 nm, spherical | [ | |
| TiO2 | 60 °C | 100 to 150 nm spherical | [ | |
| ZnO | 60 °C | 5 to 40 nm Spherical |
| [ |
| NiO | 60 °C | 16 to 52 nm spherical | [ | |
| CuO | 75 °C | 4.8 nm spherical |
| [ |
Figure 4Structures of some examples of secondary metabolites in plant.
Figure 5A schematic representation of the mechanism of reduction in Au4+ and Ag+ using plant extract containing a phytochemical like eugenol. Redrawn from [77], with permission from Springer Nature (Copyright 2022).
Figure 6Suggested mechanism of the synthesis of CaO nanoparticles mediated using aqueous broccoli extract. Redrawn from [84], with permission from John Wiley and Sons (Copyright 2022).
Some analytical techniques for the physiochemical characterizations for nanomaterials with their respective advantages and disadvantages. Redrawn from [87], with permission from Elsevier (Copyright 2022).
| Physiochemical Properties | Analytical Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase, size, shape, and structure of crystalline materials | XRD | Widely recognized technique. | Limited to only crystalline materials. |
| Structure and conformation | Infrared spectroscopy (IR). Attenuated total reflection | Cheap and Fast measurement. | The older version may possess complicated sample preparation (IR) procedure. |
| Hydrodynamic size distribution. | Dynamic light | Measurement can be achieved in any solvent of interest. | Measurement is influenced by small numbers of large particles. |
| Stability referring to surface charge | Zeta potential | Many samples can be measured simultaneously. | Measurements are not easily reproducible. |
| Aggregation/agglomeration | Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Environmental SEM (ESEM) | Images of material are obtained in high resolutions. | Only dry samples are required. |
| Aggregation/agglomeration | Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) | The shape of material with higher spatial resolution than SEM can be easily observed and measured. | Very thin sample is required in non-physiological conditions. |
| Chemical and electronic properties. | Raman scattering (RS) Surface-enhanced Raman (SERS) Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) | Does not require sample preparation. | Measurements are not reproducible. |
| Hydrodynamic dimension | Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) | Many particles can be measured simultaneously (using ELS). | Limit in fluorophore species. |
| Size/size distribution | Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) | Simple sample preparation is required. | - |
| Aggregation/agglomeration | Atomic force microscopy (AFM) | Mapping of the sample surface in 3D. | Lateral dimensions are usually overestimated. |
Figure 7General schematic representation of the antibacterial mode of action for metal-based nanoparticles. The MNPs interact with the membrane of the bacteria, causing membrane disruption. This interaction also brings about the frequent generation of free radicals (ROS yellow spots) which may generate another secondary damage, hinder protein function, cause DNA destruction, and result in excess radical production. These nanomaterials can also proceed via photoactivation (photocatalyst); nitric oxide (NO) NM is involved with RNS (green spots). Redrawn from [107], with permission from Hindawi Publishing Corporation (copyright 2022).
Some Plant mediated Metal-based Nanoparticles with their Biological Potentials.
| Biological Source | Natural Extract/Compound | Type of MNPs | Biological Activity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant | Catechin | CuO-NPs | Antibacterial |
[ |
| Almond seed extract | AuNPs-Quercetin | Anti-inflammatory, anticancer, anti-angiogenic |
[ | |
| Fruit extract of | AuNPs | Antioxidant |
[ | |
| Extract of | AgNPs | Antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial |
[ | |
| Extract of | AuNPs | Antioxidant, reducing ability |
[ | |
| Dragon fruit from the genus | AuNPs | Anticancer (Breast cancer) |
[ | |
| Extract of | AgNPs | Anticancer, antiviral |
[ | |
| Extract of | AgNPs | Antibacterial, catalytic |
[ | |
|
| AgNPs | Antimicrobial, | [ | |
| Extracts of | AgNPs | Antioxidant and reducing capacities |
[ | |
| Extract of | AuNP | Anticancer |
[ | |
| Extract of | AuNP-conjugated graphene oxide | Antioxidant and anticancer |
[ | |
| Aqueous extract of | AgNPs | Antioxidant, antibacterial, wound healing effect, antidiabetic |
[ | |
| AgNPs | Antidiabetic and anticancer |
[ | ||
| AgNPs | Antioxidant, antibacterial and anticancer |
[ | ||
| AgNPs | Antibacterial |
[ | ||
| AgNPs | Antimicrobial, anticancer |
[ | ||
| AgNPs | Antidiabetic, anticancer, antioxidant, antibacterial |
[ | ||
|
| AgNPs | Antibacterial, antioxidant, drug release system |
[ | |
| Fruit extract of | AuNPs | Targeted drug delivery against breast cancer |
[ | |
| AgNPs | Antimicrobial, anticancer |
[ | ||
| AuNPs | Anticancer |
[ | ||
|
| AgNPs | Antiviral | [ | |
| AgNPs | Antiviral | [ | ||
| Seed extract of | AuNPs | Antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer |
[ | |
| Extract of | AuNPs | Cytotoxic (breast cancer) |
[ | |
| Extract of | AuNPs | Anticancer |
[ | |
| Dried fruit extract of | AuNPs | Antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer |
[ | |
| Fruit extracts of | AuNPs | Anticancer |
[ | |
| Podophyllotoxin extract from | AuNPs | Anticancer |
[ | |
| Xanthone derivative (mangiferin) from | AuNPs | Non-toxic to normal human breast cell line |
[ | |
|
| AuNPs | Anticancer |
[ | |
| Kaempferol glucoside from | AuNPs | Antioxidant, anticancer |
[ | |
| Aqueous fruit extract of | AuNPs, | Antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer |
[ | |
|
| AgNps | Antiviral | [ | |
| AuNPs | Antioxidant, anticancer |
[ | ||
| AuNPs | Anticancer |
[ | ||
| Aqueous root extract of | AuNPs | Antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer |
[ | |
| CuO-NPs | Anticancer, |
[ | ||
| CuO-NPs | Anticancer |
[ | ||
| Leaf extracts of | CuO-NPs | Antibacterial |
[ | |
| leaf extracts of olive ( | ZnO-NPs | Antioxidant |
[ | |
| CuO-NPs | Anticancer, antioxidant, antifungal, antibacterial, cutaneous wound healing |
[ | ||
| Aqueous extracts of aerial roots of | AuNPs | Anticancer |
[ | |
| AgNPs | Anti-inflammatory |
[ | ||
| AuNP-Doxorubicin conjugate | Anticancer |
[ | ||
| AuNPs | Antibacterial, antioxidant, anticancer, catalytic |
[ | ||
| Marine plants | Seaweed ( | AgNPs | Antibacterial |
[ |
| Seaweed ( | AgNPs | Antifungal |
[ | |
| Carrageenan oligosaccharide derived from marine red alga | AuNPs | Antitumour |
[ | |
|
| AgNPs | Antimicrobial |
[ | |
| Algae | n-hexane and ethyl acetate fractions of | AgNPs | Antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer |
[ |
|
| AuNPs | Anticancer (Breast cancer) |
[ |
key: AuNPs—Gold nanoparticles; AgNPs—Silver nanoparticles; AgCl-NPs—silver chloride nanoparticles; CuO-NPs—copper oxide nanoparticles; ZnO-NPs—zinc oxide nanoparticles; SeNPs—selenium nanoparticles.
Figure 8The anti-inflammatory mechanism adopted by metal-based nanoparticles. Redrawn from [187], with permission from Elsevier (copyright 2022).