| Literature DB >> 35625228 |
Monica Naufel Sousa1, Alessandra Teixeira Macedo1, Gabriella Freitas Ferreira2, Haryne Lizandrey Azevedo Furtado1, Aruanã Joaquim Matheus Costa Rodrigues Pinheiro3, Lídio Gonçalves Lima-Neto3, Valéria Costa Fontes3, Rayana Larissa Pinheiro Soares Ferreira1, Cristina Andrade Monteiro4, Angela Falcai1, Lillian Nunes Gomes5, Queila da Silva Rosa Bragança2, Dennyse de Sousa Brandão Torres1, Lívia Câmara de Carvalho Galvão6, Rodrigo Assuncao Holanda1, Julliana Ribeiro Alves Santos1.
Abstract
Failures in endodontic treatments are mostly associated with the difficulty in eradicating microbes of the root canal system, highlighting the need to develop novel effective antimicrobials. Punica granatum (pomegranate) leaf hydroalcoholic extract may be a potential alternative in canal dressing, owing to its antimicrobial properties. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of hydroalcoholic leaf extract of Punica granatum (HEPg) alone or in combination with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans in isolation and in mono- and polymicrobial biofilms. Microdilution tests in broth and assays for inhibition of biofilm formation were carried out to evaluate the antimicrobial properties of HEPg and HEPg + Ca(OH)2 against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. The cytotoxicity of HEPg in HaCaT cells was evaluated by MTT assay. HEPg and HEPg + Ca(OH)2 exerted significant antimicrobial activity against planktonic cells and mono- and polymicrobial biofilms. The combination of Punica granatum extract with Ca(OH)2 appears to be a promising alternative in endodontic treatments, which could be tested in vivo to confirm the efficacy of this mixture in disinfecting root canal systems.Entities:
Keywords: Candida albicans; Enterococcus faecalis; Punica granatum; antibiofilm; endodontic infections
Year: 2022 PMID: 35625228 PMCID: PMC9138113 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11050584
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Figure 1Activity of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) (A); hydroalcoholic leaf extract of Punica granatum (HEPg) (B); calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) + hydroalcoholic leaf extract of Punica granatum (HEPg) (C); and Nystatin (D) against Candida biofilm. * = p < 0.05 at different concentrations that inhibit biofilm formation of Candida albicans compared to cells not treated (NT). Data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Figure 2Activity of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) (A); hydroalcoholic leaf extract of Punica granatum (HEPg) (B); calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) + hydroalcoholic leaf extract of Punica granatum (HEPg) (C); and Amoxicillin (D) against Enterococcus biofilm. * = p < 0.05 at different concentrations that inhibit biofilm formation of E. faecalis compared to cells not treated (NT). Data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Figure 3Activity of hydroalcoholic leaf extract of Punica granatum (HEPg); calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) + hydroalcoholic leaf extract of Punica granatum (HEPg) against polymicrobial biofilm formation. * = p < 0.05 at different concentrations that inhibit biofilm formation of C. albicans plus E. faecalis compared to cells not treated (NT). Data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Figure 4Cytotoxicity of hydroalcoholic leaf extract of Punica granatum (HEPg) against HaCaT cells at concentrations tested. HaCaT cells were treated with 1000, 500, 250, and 125 µg/mL of the hydroalcoholic leaf extract of Punica granatum (HEPg). The results were expressed as percentage of cellular viability. NT = no treatment. Data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD).