| Literature DB >> 35624987 |
Marc A Khoury1, Mohamad-Ali Bahsoun2,3, Ayad Fadhel1, Shukrullah Shunbuli1, Saanika Venkatesh1,4, Abdollah Ghazvanchahi2,3, Samir Mitha2,3, Karissa Chan2,3, Luis R Fornazzari1,5, Nathan W Churchill1,6, Zahinoor Ismail7, David G Munoz1,8, Tom A Schweizer1,2,9,10, Alan R Moody11, Corinne E Fischer1,6,12, April Khademi1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study examines the relationship between delusional severity in cognitively impaired adults with automatically computed volume and texture biomarkers from the Normal Appearing Brain Matter (NABM) in FLAIR MRI.Entities:
Keywords: APOE4; Alzheimer’s disease; CSF tau; biomarkers; cognitive decline; delusions; dementia; white-matter texture
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624987 PMCID: PMC9139341 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12050600
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Abbreviation table.
| Abbreviation | Definition |
|---|---|
| NABM | Normal Appearing Brain Matter |
| GM | Grey-Matter |
| WM | White-Matter |
| WML | White-Matter Lesion |
| APOE4 | Apolipoprotein epsilon4 allele |
| CSFTAU | Cerebro-Spinal Fluid (CSF) tau |
| AD | Alzheimer’s Disease |
| MCI | Mild Cognitive Impairment |
| NPI-Q | Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire |
| NPS | Neuropsychiatric Symptoms |
| FLAIR MRI | Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) |
| ADNI | Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
Composition of the experimental cohort.
| Diagnosis | MCI | AD | MCI → AD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age: MEAN ± SD | 71.4 ± 7.52 | 80.2 ± 6.72 | 76.42 ± 0.49 |
| Sex [ | 15:10 | 10:7 | 1:0 |
| Delusional Severity: MEAN ± SD | 1.40 ± 0.69 | 1.53 ± 0.74 | 2.0 ± 0 |
Image acquisition parameters for the multicenter FLAIR MRI delusional dataset.
| Vendors | TR (ms) | TE (ms) | TI (ms) | Pixel Size (mm) | Slice Thickness (mm) | Magnetic Field (T) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE, Siemens, Philips | 9000–11002 | 90–153.978 | 2250–2500 | 0.8594–0.9375 | 5 | 3 |
Figure 1FLAIR MRI slices for original, NABM (a) and Damage (b) and Integrity markers (c).
Regression analysis comparing NABM biomarkers across delusional severity (1, 2, 3) and covariates. Bold is significant with p < 0.05.
| NABM Volume (%) | Integrity | Damage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | Coefficient | Coefficient | ||||
| Delusion 2 | −0.98% | 0.52 | −1.84 |
| 298.50 | 0.30 |
| Delusion 3 | −9.36% |
| −3.71 |
| 927.90 |
|
| Tau | −0.01% |
| −0.006 |
| 0.96 | 0.06 |
| Age | −0.33% |
| 0.11 |
| 39.89 |
|
| Gender | −2.37% |
| −1.08 |
| 403.00 |
|
| Education | −0.21% | 0.07 | −0.04 | 0.52 | 2.51 | 0.91 |
| ApoE4 | 0.46% | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.25 | −243.60 |
|
| ApoE44 | 1.69% |
| 1.18 |
| −384.70 |
|
| Delusion 2*Tau | 0.001% | 0.78 | 0.004 | 0.22 | −0.63 | 0.48 |
| Delusion 3*Tau | 0.02% |
| 0.01 |
| −1.77 |
|
Figure 2Distributions of NABM volume, integrity, and damage biomarkers from FLAIR, as well as CSF tau between 1—mild delusions, 2—moderate delusions, 3—severe delusions.
Regression analysis comparing NABM biomarkers across mild- and severe-delusion groups and covariates. Bold is significant with p < 0.05.
| NABM Volume (%) | Integrity | Damage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | Coefficient | Coefficient | ||||
| Severe Delusions | −3.72% |
| −2.50 |
| 485.40 | 0.05 |
| Tau | −0.01% |
| −0.56 |
| 1.03 |
|
| Age | −0.30% |
| −0.09 |
| 37.90 |
|
| Gender | −1.79% |
| −0.94 |
| 363.60 |
|
| Education | −0.09% | 0.42 | −0.02 | 0.75 | −7.04 | 0.91 |
| ApoE4 | 0.40% | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.29 | −244.10 |
|
| ApoE44 | 2.26% |
| 1.30 |
| −427.70 |
|
| Severe Delusions * Tau | 0.01% |
| 0.56 |
| −1.04 | 0.12 |
Figure 3Distributions of NABM volume, integrity, and damage biomarkers from FLAIR, as well as CSF tau between mild delusions and severe delusions.