| Literature DB >> 35624856 |
Sara Frazzini1, Elena Scaglia1, Matteo Dell'Anno1, Serena Reggi1, Sara Panseri1, Carlotta Giromini1, Davide Lanzoni1, Carlo Angelo Sgoifo Rossi1, Luciana Rossi1.
Abstract
Algae and cyanobacteria, other than their nutritional value, possess different beneficial properties, including antioxidant and antimicrobial ones. Therefore, they can be considered functional ingredients in animal feed and natural substitutes for antibiotics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant and antimicrobial capacity against porcine O138 E. coli of Ascophyllum nodosum, Chlorella vulgaris, Lithotamnium calcareum, Schizochytrium spp. as algal species and Arthrospira platensis as cyanobacteria. The antioxidant capacity was determined by ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay testing at three different concentrations (100%; 75%; 50%). The growth inhibition effect of the extracts at concentrations of 25%, 12.5%, 6%, 3% and 1.5% against porcine O138 E. coli was genetically characterized by PCR to detect the presence of major virulence factors; this was evaluated by following the microdilution bacterial growth method. The ABTS assay disclosed that Ascophyllum nodosum was the compound with the major antioxidant properties (57.75 ± 1.44 percentage of inhibition; p < 0.0001). All the extracts tested showed growth inhibition activity at a concentration of 25%. Among all extracts, A. nodosum was the most effective, showing a significant growth inhibition of E. coli; in particular, the log10 cells/mL of E. coli used as a control resulted in a significantly higher concentration of 25% and 12.5% after 4 h (8.45 ± 0.036 and 7.22 ± 0.025 log10 cells/mL, respectively; p < 0.005). This also suggests a dose-dependent relationship between the inhibitory activity and the concentration. Also, a synergistic effect was observed on antioxidant activity for the combination of Ascophyllum nodosum and Lithotamnium calcareum (p < 0.0001). Moreover, to determine if this combination could affect the viability of the IPEC-J2 cells under the normal or stress condition, the viability and membrane integrity were tested, disclosing that the combination mitigated the oxidative stress experimentally induced by increasing the cell viability. In conclusion, the results obtained highlight that the bioactive compounds of algal species are able to exert antioxidant capacity and modulate O138 E. coli growth. Also, the combination of Ascophyllum nodosum and Lithotamnium calcareum species can enhance their bioactivity, making them a promising functional feed additive and a suitable alternative to antibiotics.Entities:
Keywords: Ascophyllum nodosum; IPEC-J2; O138 E. coli; algae; antimicrobial; antioxidant; functional feed; growth inhibition; metabolomics; polyphenols
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624856 PMCID: PMC9137800 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11050992
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Primer used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
| Primers | Nucleotide Sequences |
|---|---|
| FedF-5′(F18) | CCATGGCTACTCTACAAGTAGACAAGTCTGTTTC |
| FedF-3′(F18) | GAGCTCTTACTGTATCTCGAAAACAATGGGCACCG |
| VT2e-B subunit-5′ | GGATCCATGAAGAAGATGTTTATAGCGG |
| VT2e-B subunit-3′ | AACGGGTCCACTTCAAATGATTCTCGAG |
FedF gene is a minor subunit essential for adhesion of F18 fimbriae. VT2eB is the gene codifying the B-subunit of verocytotoxin type 2 variant.
Chemical composition of dried samples of Arthrospira platensis; Ascophyllum nodosum; Chlorella vulgaris; Lithothamnium calcareum and Schizochytrium spp.
| DM (%) | Ash (%) | CF (%) | CP (%) | EE (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 95.58 | 7.11 | 0.67 | 62.00 | 0.61 |
|
| 91.44 | 25.33 | 8.92 | 6.93 | 1.79 |
|
| 96.61 | 11.80 | 0.99 | 47.20 | 0.65 |
|
| 99.60 | 92.75 | 2.91 | 0.21 | 0.27 |
| 99.20 | 5.42 | 0.18 | 2.62 | 9.06 |
All values are expressed as percentage of dry matter (% DM). DM: Dry matter; Ash: Ashes; CP: Crude Protein; EE: Ether Extract; CF: Crude Fibre.
Metabolomic profile related to the content of polyphenols and tripeptides of Arthrospira platensis; Ascophyllum nodosum; Chlorella vulgaris; Lithothamnium calcareum and Schizochytrium spp.
| Biochemical Classification | Molecules |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Ferulic acid | 675.8 ± 68.8 | 520.8 ± 15.2 | 8282.6 ± 186.0 | 18.5 ± 0.0 | 174.1 ± 20.4 |
| 4-Coumaric acid | 1909.7 ± 73.3 | 2539.1 ± 181.8 | 7853 ± 54.7 | 31.6 ± 2.9 | 138.7 ± 3.6 | |
| Gallic acid | 13.4 ± 4.8 | 579.9 ± 56.8 | 10.5 ± 1.2 | 11.4 ± 3.3 | 19.5 ± 5.5 | |
| 4-Hydroxyphenyllactic acid | 56.7 ± 30.4 | 127.6 ± 54.1 | 58.5 ± 8.5 | 24.9 ± 2.8 | 139.6 ± 135.5 | |
| Dihydrocaffeic acid | 19.4 ± 1.1 | 48.4 ± 7.0 | 13.2 ± 1.2 | 31.8 ± 4.6 | 15.0 ± 2.2 | |
| Phloroglucionol | 13.5 ± 2.1 | 6554.2 ± 635.0 | 65.2 ± 3.3 | 4.0 ± 1.1 | 2.5 ± 2.0 | |
| Isoferulic acid | 6.8 ± 0.2 | 23.1 ± 4.1 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 11.0 ± 2.5 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | |
| 2-Hydroxy-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)butanoic acid | 17.7 ± 1.0 | 58.1 ± 4.1 | 20.9 ± 0.2 | 39.6 ± 7.4 | 42.9 ± 12.2 | |
| Sorbicillin | 36.6 ± 16.5 | 146.9 ± 96.2 | 129.4 ± 15.9 | 26.3 ± 3.6 | 139.7 ± 4.6 | |
| 2,6-Diphenylphenol | ND | ND | 37.6 ± 1.3 | ND | ND | |
|
| Oxidized Glutathione | 40.5 ± 0.4 | 32,622.4 ± 2004.0 | 1168.1 ± 213.2 | 158.7 ± 39.5 | 64.9 ± 61.1 |
All values are expressed as ng/g. Data are shown as means and standard deviations.
Figure 1Percentage of inhibition (PI%) of radical scavenging activity at three different concentrations (100%; 75%; 50%) of four algal and cynobacterial extracts tested (Arthrospira platensis; Ascophyllum nodosum; Chlorella vulgaris; Lithothamnium calcareum and Schizochytrium spp.). Data are shown as means and standard deviations. * Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences among tested compounds (Treatment p < 0.0001).
Figure 2Antioxidant activity of algae and cyanobacteria combination. Figure shows the percentage of inhibition (PI%) of all the possible combinations between the species analyzed. Data are shown as means and standard deviations. All the combinations are significantly different compared to the combination of Ascophyllum nodosum extract and Lithothamnium calcareum extract. Data are shown as means and standard deviations. a–f Means (n = 3) with different superscripts are significantly different (Treatment p < 0.0001).
Figure 3Evaluation of growth inhibition of Arthrospira platensis, Chlorella vulgaris, Schizochytrium spp., Lithothamnium calcareum and Ascophyllum nodosum extracts at a dilution of 1:4 against E. coli. (a) Growth inhibition of Arthrospira platensis. (b) Growth inhibition of Chlorella vulgaris. (c) Growth inhibition of Schizochytrium spp. (d) Growth inhibition of Lithothamnium calcareum. (e) Growth inhibition of Ascophyllum nodosum. Data are shown as means and standard deviations. Asterisk means (n = 3) with different superscripts are significantly different, * p < 0.0001, ** p < 0.05.
Figure 4Viability of intestinal IPEC-J2 cells. (a) Dose−response curves with different concentrations of Ascophyllum nodosum, Lithotamnium calcareum and the combination of both algae; (b) Viability of IPEC-J2 cells challenged with H2O2 0.5 mM and pre-treated with Ascophyllum nodosum, Lithotamnium calcareum and the combination of both algae; (c) Viability of IPEC-J2 cells challenged with H2O2 1 mM and pre-treated with Ascophyllum nodosum, Lithotamnium calcareum and the combination of both algae. Data are shown as means and standard deviations. a–e Means (n = 3) with different superscripts are significantly different (Treatment p < 0.05).
Figure 5Membrane integrity of intestinal IPEC-J2 cells. (a) Dose−response curves with different concentrations of the combination of Ascophyllum nodosum and Lithotamnium calcareum; (b) Membrane integrity of IPEC-J2 cells challenged with H2O2 0.5 mM and pre-treated with the combination of Ascophyllum nodosum and Lithotamnium calcareum; (c) Membrane integrity of IPEC-J2 cells challenged with H2O2 1 mM and pre-treated with the combination of Ascophyllum nodosum and Lithotamnium calcareum. Data are shown as means and standard deviations. a–c Means (n = 3) with different superscripts are significantly different (Treatment p < 0.05).