| Literature DB >> 35624798 |
Liyun Wu1,2, Wenjie Xu1, Hongyan Li1, Bo Dong1,2, Hancheng Geng1,2, Junyan Jin1, Dong Han1,2, Haokun Liu1, Xiaoming Zhu1, Yunxia Yang1, Shouqi Xie1,2,3.
Abstract
Previous studies have found that vitamin C (VC) has protective effects in fish. However, the efficacy of VC on hypoxia-induced liver injury in fish remains unknown. Therefore, to investigate the protective mechanism of VC on liver injury after acute hypoxic stimulation in fish, gibel carp were fed a diet containing VC for eight weeks, then were subjected to acute hypoxia stimulation. The specific growth rate of fish was increased by the supplementation of VC. Plasma stress markers (glucose, lactic acid, and cortisol) were decreased by the VC supplementation. Moreover, the levels of the inflammatory cytokines (tnf-α, il-2, il-6, and il-12) were increased by enhancing the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway. Upregulation of the antioxidant enzymes activity (CAT, SOD, and GPx); T-AOC; and anti-inflammatory factors (il-4 and tgf-β) highlighted the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of VC. The results showed that VC reduced the apoptotic index of the fish hypothalamus. The expression of GRP78 protein in the liver and endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis induced by hypoxia were inhibited by VC. Taken together, the results indicate that VC can attenuate oxidative damage, inflammation, and acute hypoxia induced apoptosis in gibel carp via the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway. The results identify a new defense strategy of gibel carp in response to hypoxic conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway; apoptosis; hypoxia; inflammation; oxidative stress; vitamin C
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624798 PMCID: PMC9137936 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11050935
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Ingredients and proximate composition of the experimental diets (% dry matter).
| Ingredients | CON | VC |
|---|---|---|
| White fish meal 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Rapeseed meal 2 | 20 | 20 |
| Soybean meal 2 | 25 | 25 |
| Wheat flour | 25.6 | 25.6 |
| Oil mixture 3 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Vitamin C | 0 | 0.12 |
| Vitamin premix 4 | 0.39 | 0.39 |
| Choline chloride | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Mineral premix 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Carboxy methyl cellulose sodium | 3 | 3 |
| Cellulose | 0.40 | 0.28 |
|
| ||
| Crude protein (%) | 37.21 | 37.42 |
| Crude lipid (%) | 6.77 | 6.63 |
| Moisture (%) | 9.08 | 9.17 |
| Ash (%) | 10.02 | 10.34 |
| Gross energy (kJ g−1) | 19.27 | 19.22 |
1 White fish meal: Purchased from American Seafood Company, Seattle, WA, USA. 2 Soybean and rapeseed meal: Purchased from Coland Feed Co. Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei, China. 3 Oil mixture: soybean oil: fish oil = 1:1. 4 Vitamin premix (mg kg−1 diet): Vitamin B1, 20; Vitamin B2, 20; Vitamin B6, 20; Vitamin B12, 0.02; folic acid, 5; calcium pantothenate, 50; inositol, 100; niacin, 100; biotin, 0.1; cellulose, 3522; Vitamin C, 100; Vitamin A, 110; Vitamin D, 20; Vitamin E, 50; Vitamin K, 10. 5 Mineral salt premix (mg kg−1 diet): NaCl, 500.0; MgSO4·7H2O, 8155.6; NaH2PO4·2H2O, 12500.0; KH2PO4, 16000; Ca(H2PO4)·2H2O, 7650.6; FeSO4·7H2O, 2286.2; C6H10CaO6·5H2O, 1750.0; ZnSO4·7H2O, 178.0; MnSO4·H2O, 61.4; CuSO4·5H2O, 15.5; CoSO4·7H2O, 0.91; KI, 1.5; Na2SeO3, 0.60; Corn starch, 899.7.
Sequences of primers applied for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in gibel carp.
| Gene Name | Sense and Antisense Primer (5’–3’) | Gene Bank | Product Length |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accession No. | (bp) | ||
| Tumor necrosis factor-α ( | TTGAGCAGGAGATGGGAACCG | XM_026282152.1 | 115 |
| AGAGCCTCAGGGCAACGGAAA | |||
| Interleukin-2 ( | GACCACAAAGGTAGACCCATCC | MN338056 | 212 |
| GAGGTTTGTGCGGAATGGAC | |||
| Interleukin-6 ( | TGTTCTCAGGGCATTCGCTT | XM_026289280.1 | 161 |
| GGAGTTGTAGTGCCCTTGGT | |||
| Interleukin-12 ( | CTTCAGAAGCAGCTTTGTTGTTG | LN592213.1 | 77 |
| CAGTTTTTGAGAGCTCACCAATATC | |||
| Interleukin-1β ( | TTTGTGAAGATGCGCTGCTC | AB757758.1 | 133 |
| CCAATCTCGACCTTCCTGGTG | |||
| Interleukin-4 ( | CGATTGTAGCCGTTACTGGGT | KX574595 | 166 |
| TGGCAAATGTGTTCCTCCG | |||
| Transforming growth factorβ ( | ATGAGGGTGGAGAGTTTAT | EU086521.1 | 155 |
| AGTCGTAGTTTGCTGAGAA | |||
| Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene | TTGCGAATCCAAAGGGGACA | XM_026291433.1 | 196 |
| enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, alpha ( | TCTGTGATGACGGCGAGATG |
Effects of dietary VC on growth performance and body composition of gibel carp.
| Category | Parameter | Group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CON | VC | ||
|
| Initial body weight (g) | 6.60 ± 0.00 | 6.67 ± 0.03 |
| Final body weight (g) | 26.40 ± 0.21 a | 31.40 ± 1.36 b | |
| WGR 1 (%) | 219.80 ± 12.98 | 261.38 ± 17.86 | |
| FE 2 (%) | 44.19 ± 0.42 | 50.79 ± 2.81 | |
| SGR 3 (% d−1) | 4.93 ± 0.03 a | 5.54 ± 0.16 b | |
|
| Crude protein (%) | 15.18 ± 0.16 | 14.91 ± 0.1 |
| Crude lipid (%) | 7.35 ± 0.19 | 7.22 ± 0.04 | |
| Ash (%) | 2.68 ± 0.12 | 2.60 ± 0.13 | |
| Moisture (%) | 71.95 ± 0.54 | 71.81 ± 0.27 | |
The data listed in the table are all expressed as the means ± SEM, and the superscripts (a or b) of different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). 1 WGR: Feeding rate (%) = [(final weight (g) − initial weight (g))/initial weight (g)] × 100]. 2 FE: Feeding efficiency (%) = (100 × fresh body weight gain)/dry feed intake. 3 SGR: Specific growth rate (% d−1) = 100 × [ln (final weight) - ln (initial weight)]/day.
Figure 1Plasma metabolites of gibel carp in the control and normal groups and hypoxia groups after feeding with VC for 56 days. The * or ** at the top of the bar chart indicates significant differences between treatments; * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), and ** indicates an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 6).
Figure 2Changes in HIF-1α protein expression in the liver of gibel carp in normal and hypoxia groups after 56 days of feeding with VC. The * at the top of the bar chart indicates significant differences between treatments, * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 6).
Figure 3After 56 days of diet supplemented with VC, the expression levels of Nrf2 and Keap1 protein (A) and the expression of related genes (B) involved in antioxidant the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway in the liver of gibel carp were altered between the normal and hypoxia groups. The * or ** at the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences between treatments; * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), and ** indicates an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 6). hsp70—heat shock protein 70; cat—catalase; sod—superoxide dismutase; gpx—glutathione peroxidase.
Figure 4Changes in antioxidant enzyme parameters in the liver of gibel carp in the normal and hypoxia groups after 56 days of feeding with VC. The * or ** at the top of the bar chart indicates a significant difference between treatments; * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), and ** indicates an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01). All of the data are presented as mean ± standard error (n = 6). T-AOC—Total antioxidant capacity; CAT—Catalase; SOD—Superoxide dismutase; GP—Glutathione peroxidase; MDA—Malondialdehyde; GSH—Reduced glutathione.
Figure 5Changes of inflammation-related genes in the liver of gibel carp in the normal and hypoxia groups after 56 days of feeding with VC. The * or ** at the top of the bar chart indicates significant differences between treatments; * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), and ** indicates the extremely significant difference (p < 0.01). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 6). tnf-α—tumor necrosis factor-α; il-2—interleukin 2; il-6—interleukin 6; il-12—interleukin 12; il-1β—interleukin 1β; tgf-β—transforming growth factor-β; il-4—interleukin 4; iκbα—nf-κb inhibitorα.
Figure 6Changes in the expression levels of endoplasmic reticulum stress key protein, (A) and related genes (B) in the liver of gibel carp in normal and hypoxia groups after 56 days of feeding with VC. The * or ** at the top of the bar chart indicates significant differences between treatments; * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), and ** indicates an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 6). GRP78—glucose-regulated protein 78; ire1—inositol-requiring protein-1a; perk—eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 3; atf6—activating transcription factor 6; bip—binding immunoglobulin protein; xbp1—X-box-binding protein 1; ei2fa—eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2A; atf4—activating transcription factor 4; chop—DNA damage-inducible transcript 3 protein.
Figure 7Changes of the expression levels of autophagy (A) and apoptosis (B)-related genes in the liver of gibel carp in the normal group and hypoxia group after 56 days of feeding with VC. The * or ** at the top of the bar chart indicates significant difference between treatments; * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), and ** indicates an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 6).
Figure 8Changes of Casp 3 and Casp 9 activities in the livers of gibel carp in normal group and hypoxia group after 56 days of feeding with VC. The * or ** at the top of the bar chart indicates significant differences between treatments; * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), and ** indicates an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 6).
Figure 9Changes of DAPI and TUNEL staining from representative sections in the hypothalamus of gibel carp in the normal group and hypoxia group after 56 days of feeding with VC. Positive apoptotic nuclei in green and normal nuclei are shown in blue. The magnification and scale of the microscope were 200× and 100 μm, respectively. The ** at the top of the bar chart indicates significant differences between treatments; ** indicates an extremely significant difference (p < 0.01). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 6).