| Literature DB >> 35624420 |
Li Li1,2,3, Shunli Cui1, Phat Dang4, Xinlei Yang1, Xuejun Wei3, Kai Chen3, Lifeng Liu5, Charles Y Chen6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a grain legume crop that originated from South America and is now grown around the world. Peanut growth habit affects the variety's adaptability, planting patterns, mechanized harvesting, disease resistance, and yield. The objective of this study was to map the quantitative trait locus (QTL) associated with peanut growth habit-related traits by combining the genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) and bulked segregant analysis sequencing (BSA-seq) methods.Entities:
Keywords: BSA-seq; GWAS; Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.); Plant growth habit
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624420 PMCID: PMC9145184 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08640-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 4.547
Phenotypic variation for growth habit-related traits in the U.S. mini-core collection
| Environment | Trait | Max | Min | Mean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingyuan | LBA | 87.30 | 36.10 | 67.85 | 10.43 | 15.38% |
| (China) | MSH | 32.50 | 8.50 | 18.67 | 6.42 | 34.40% |
| LBL | 49.00 | 15.00 | 29.88 | 7.87 | 26.33% | |
| ER | 43.63 | 6.38 | 21.70 | 6.59 | 30.37% | |
| IOPT | 4.90 | 0.92 | 1.72 | 0.63 | 36.89% | |
| Dawson | LBA | 87.30 | 32.65 | 68.71 | 12.80 | 18.63% |
| (U.S.) | MSH | 63.40 | 20.38 | 38.50 | 9.19 | 23.87% |
| LBL | 77.60 | 26.55 | 51.97 | 10.14 | 19.52% | |
| ER | 46.58 | 11.75 | 28.20 | 7.34 | 26.03% | |
| IOPT | 2.68 | 0.77 | 1.38 | 0.30 | 21.52% |
SD, standard deviation; CV is the coefficient of variation
Fig. 1The distribution of SNPs detected in the entire association mapping panel. Red and gray horizontal bars show genomic regions that are rich and poor in SNPs, respectively
The summary of the number of polymorphic SNPs mapped in the 20 chromosomes of peanut
| Chr | No. of SNPs | Chr. length (Mb) | Density of SNP (kb/SNP) | PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A01 | 845.00 | 106.85 | 126.45 | 0.28 |
| A02 | 452.00 | 93.54 | 206.94 | 0.29 |
| A03 | 607.00 | 134.89 | 222.23 | 0.28 |
| A04 | 637.00 | 122.71 | 192.63 | 0.27 |
| A05 | 586.00 | 109.45 | 186.77 | 0.27 |
| A06 | 554.00 | 112.00 | 202.16 | 0.28 |
| A07 | 440.00 | 78.82 | 179.13 | 0.28 |
| A08 | 299.00 | 49.37 | 165.13 | 0.28 |
| A09 | 350.00 | 120.50 | 344.28 | 0.29 |
| A10 | 293.00 | 109.30 | 373.05 | 0.30 |
| B01 | 601.00 | 137.29 | 228.43 | 0.28 |
| B02 | 325.00 | 108.95 | 335.22 | 0.28 |
| B03 | 482.00 | 135.54 | 281.19 | 0.28 |
| B04 | 487.00 | 132.17 | 271.39 | 0.29 |
| B05 | 456.00 | 149.84 | 328.61 | 0.27 |
| B06 | 633.00 | 136.16 | 215.10 | 0.29 |
| B07 | 680.00 | 126.13 | 185.48 | 0.30 |
| B08 | 1010.00 | 129.56 | 128.28 | 0.26 |
| B09 | 1428.00 | 147.06 | 102.99 | 0.26 |
| B10 | 1177.00 | 135.98 | 115.53 | 0.26 |
Chr chromosome, PIC polymorphism information content
Fig. 2Population structure analysis, phylogenetic tree construction, and principal component analysis (PCA) within the U.S. mini-core collection. A Population structure analysis. B Phylogenetic tree constructed with UPGMA clustering method. C Principal component analysis showing the population structure in the diversity panel. Four subpopulations are designated as G1, G2, G3, and G4
Summary of SLAF numbers and marker depths
| Sample ID | SLAF number | Total depth | Average depth ( ×) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jihua5 | 150,080 | 2,673,407 | 17.81 |
| M130 | 150,190 | 3,355,918 | 22.34 |
| P-pool | 153,081 | 6,595,001 | 43.08 |
| E-pool | 152,528 | 5,720,671 | 37.51 |
Fig. 3A distribution diagram of the markers on each chromosome. Black and gray horizontal bars show genomic regions that are rich and poor in SNPs, respectively
Fig. 4Expression levels of Araip.E64SW between Jihua5 and ‘M130’. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. Each data point was obtained from three biological and technical replicates. Asterisks on the top of the bars indicate statistically significant differences between Jihua5 and ‘M130’ (*0.01 < P < 0.05)