Mirjam de Bruin-Hoegée1,2, Irene M van Damme1, Tomas van Groningen2, Debora van der Riet-van Oeveren2, Daan Noort2, Arian C van Asten1,3. 1. van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, Amsterdam 1090GD, The Netherlands. 2. TNO Defence, Safety and Security, Dep. CBRN Protection, Lange Kleiweg 137, Rijswijk 2288GJ, The Netherlands. 3. CLHC, Amsterdam Center for Forensic Science and Medicine, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, Amsterdam 1090GD, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Chlorine is a widely available industrial chemical and involved in a substantial number of cases of poisoning. It has also been used as a chemical warfare agent in military conflicts. To enable forensic verification, the persistent biomarkers 3-chlorotyrosine and 3,5-dichlorotyrosine in biomedical samples could be detected. An important shortfall of these biomarkers, however, is the relatively high incidence of elevated levels of chlorinated tyrosine residues in individuals with inflammatory diseases who have not been exposed to chlorine. Therefore, more reliable biomarkers are necessary to distinguish between endogenous formation and exogeneous exposure. The present study aims to develop a novel diagnostic tool for identifying site-specific chlorinated peptides as a more unambiguous indicator of exogeneous chlorine exposure. Human blood plasma was exposed in vitro to various chlorine concentrations, and the plasma proteins were subsequently digested by pronase, trypsin, or pepsin. After sample preparation, the digests were analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). In line with other studies, low levels of 3-chlorotyrosine and 3,5-dichlorotyrosine were found in blank plasma samples in this study. Therefore, 50 site-specific biomarkers were identified, which could be used as more unambiguous biomarkers for chlorine exposure. Chlorination of the peptides TY*ETTLEK, Y*KPGQTVK, Y*QQKPGQAPR, HY*EGSTVPEK, and Y*LY*EIAR could already be detected at moderate in vitro chlorine exposure levels. In addition, the latter two peptides were found to have dichlorinated fragments. Especially, Y*LY*EIAR, with a distinct chlorination pattern in the MS spectra, could potentially be used to differentiate exogeneous exposure from endogenous causes as other studies reported that this part of human serum albumin is nitrated rather than chlorinated under physiological conditions. In conclusion, trypsin digestion combined with high-resolution MS analysis of chlorinated peptides could constitute a valuable technique for the forensic verification of exposure to chlorine.
Chlorine is a widely available industrial chemical and involved in a substantial number of cases of poisoning. It has also been used as a chemical warfare agent in military conflicts. To enable forensic verification, the persistent biomarkers 3-chlorotyrosine and 3,5-dichlorotyrosine in biomedical samples could be detected. An important shortfall of these biomarkers, however, is the relatively high incidence of elevated levels of chlorinated tyrosine residues in individuals with inflammatory diseases who have not been exposed to chlorine. Therefore, more reliable biomarkers are necessary to distinguish between endogenous formation and exogeneous exposure. The present study aims to develop a novel diagnostic tool for identifying site-specific chlorinated peptides as a more unambiguous indicator of exogeneous chlorine exposure. Human blood plasma was exposed in vitro to various chlorine concentrations, and the plasma proteins were subsequently digested by pronase, trypsin, or pepsin. After sample preparation, the digests were analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). In line with other studies, low levels of 3-chlorotyrosine and 3,5-dichlorotyrosine were found in blank plasma samples in this study. Therefore, 50 site-specific biomarkers were identified, which could be used as more unambiguous biomarkers for chlorine exposure. Chlorination of the peptides TY*ETTLEK, Y*KPGQTVK, Y*QQKPGQAPR, HY*EGSTVPEK, and Y*LY*EIAR could already be detected at moderate in vitro chlorine exposure levels. In addition, the latter two peptides were found to have dichlorinated fragments. Especially, Y*LY*EIAR, with a distinct chlorination pattern in the MS spectra, could potentially be used to differentiate exogeneous exposure from endogenous causes as other studies reported that this part of human serum albumin is nitrated rather than chlorinated under physiological conditions. In conclusion, trypsin digestion combined with high-resolution MS analysis of chlorinated peptides could constitute a valuable technique for the forensic verification of exposure to chlorine.
Chlorine
(Cl2), a highly reactive and toxic gas, is
one of the most abundantly used industrial chemicals, with an annual
production of multi-million tons.[1,2] It has a wide
variety of industrial applications, including the production of polymers
and chlorinated solvents, separation of metals in mining, the disinfection
of drinking water, and use within the bleaching industry.[3] It has been the cause of a significant number
of cases of acute poisoning.[4,5] Although known as a
toxic dual-use chemical, it has not been scheduled by the Organization
for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), mainly because the
large scale of production and storage makes verification or inspections
practically impossible.[6] Notwithstanding,
its use as a weapon is an obvious violation of the Chemical Weapons
Convention. Chlorine gas was the first deployed chemical warfare agent
during World War I, resulting in many victims.[7] Recently, the OPCW published multiple reports stating that chlorine
has been used in the ongoing conflict in the Syrian Arab Republic.[8−13]Exposure to chlorine can cause severe acute and long-term
health
effects. Inhalation exposure to 1–3 ppm is already associated
with mild irritation of mucous membranes.[4] Based on this value, the recommended exposure limit is 0.5 ppm for
longer-term exposure and the acceptable short-term exposure limit
is 1 ppm.[14] Eye and throat irritation will
develop at exposure levels between 5 and 15 ppm.[4] Levels exceeding 15 ppm result in cough, chest pain, and
choking.[15] From a concentration of 50 ppm,
damage to the main airways and acute pulmonary edema occur.[2] In general, a dose above 400 ppm is lethal as
this high concentration will result in respiratory arrest, hemorrhage,
and acute burns of the upper and proximal lower airways.[15] Long-term exposure can result in similar symptoms
as short-term exposure below 50 ppm, where in 10% of the cases, incomplete
recovery after symptomatic treatment was reported.[16]Especially in the case of major incidents with many
affected individuals,
methods for rapid triage and diagnosis of chlorine exposure are indispensable.
However, detection of intact agents in biomedical samples is often
not possible due to the reactivity of chemical threat agents. Furthermore,
other traces of evidence of intentional release are usually difficult
to obtain as well. For this purpose, biomarkers of exposure are used
for verification purposes. Metabolic indicators for chlorine poisoning
are the phospholipid l-α-phosphatidylglycerol,[17] chlorinated lipids such as 2-chloropalmitaldehyde
and 2-chlorosearaldehyde,[18] 8-isoprostane
(8-isoPGF2α) as a marker of lipid peroxidation,[19] and adducts to tyrosine, such as 3-chlorotyrosine
(Cl-Tyr) and 3,5-dichlorotyrosine (di-Cl-Tyr).[20−23] In particular, tyrosine chlorination
yields persistent biomarkers that can be found days after chlorine
poisoning.[21]During chlorine gas
exposure, chlorine reacts in the body with
aqueous mucus on epithelial tissues to form hydrochloric acid and
hypochlorite.[2] Protein adducts can be formed
when chlorine oxidizes tyrosine by electrophilic aromatic substitution.[21] The aromatic ring in tyrosine is particularly
reactive due to its electron-donating hydroxyl group. Figure shows the reaction of tyrosine
with chlorine, where substitution is directed toward the ortho position,
leading to the formation of Cl-Tyr and di-Cl-Tyr.[24]
Figure 1
Reaction scheme of electrophilic aromatic substitution of tyrosine
by chlorine, leading to the formation of 3-chlorotyrosine and 3,5-dichlorotyrosine.
Reaction scheme of electrophilic aromatic substitution of tyrosine
by chlorine, leading to the formation of 3-chlorotyrosine and 3,5-dichlorotyrosine.An important shortfall of these biomarkers, however,
is the relatively
high incidence of elevated levels of chlorinated tyrosine residues
in individuals who have not been exposed to chlorine. Chlorinated
tyrosine biomarkers were found in people with inflammatory diseases,[21,25,41] diabetes mellitus,[26] and atherosclerotic vascular disease.[27] For instance, Buss et al. reported that infants
with respiratory distress had more than 6 times higher Cl-Tyr levels
in tracheal aspirate proteins detected by GC–MS, compared to
the control group without known diseases.[25] In addition, for patients with inflammatory disease, maximum levels
of 20 and 5 ng/mL blood have been analyzed by liquid chromatography
tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) for Cl-Tyr and di-Cl-Tyr,
respectively.[21] Interestingly, in the referred
study, both the healthy and diseased groups showed a relatively high
Cl-Tyr level with a large variation, which makes verification even
more difficult. In this respect, the di-Cl-Tyr adduct has been considered
slightly more specific for exogenous chlorine exposure than the Cl-Tyr
adduct.[21,28] Nonetheless, verification of a chlorine
attack based on these biomarkers is less reliable because of the potential
presence of Cl-Tyr and di-Cl-Tyr in the blood plasma of non-exposed
individuals. Therefore, more unambiguous biomarkers of chlorine exposure
are necessary to differentiate exogeneous exposure from endogenous
processes.A powerful tool to obtain sequence information for
individual peptides
is the use of liquid chromatography–high-resolution tandem
mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS/MS) for bottom-up proteomics. Data-dependent
analysis in combination with database searching can be used to screen
for peptides with post-translational modifications (PTMs). This strategy
has successfully led to the identification of biomarkers for the exposure
to other chemical threat agents.[29,30] The validity
of such an approach within the context of Cl-Tyr being a biomarker
of inflammatory diseases has recently been reported by Nybo et al.
in various publications.[31−33] Detailed analysis of site-specific
peptide modifications is expected to lead to improved differentiation
of endogenous reactions due to oxidative stress and exogeneous chlorine
exposure because the former will cause both chlorination and nitration
of tyrosine, whereas the latter will only result in chlorination.[34,35]Consequently, the current study aims to develop a diagnostic
tool
for identifying chlorine–tyrosine biomarkers as robust and
specific indicators of exogeneous chlorine exposure. First, human
blood plasma was exposed in vitro to various chlorine concentrations.
Subsequently, the isolated plasma proteins were digested by pronase,
trypsin, or pepsin and analyzed by LC–MS/MS and LC–HRMS/MS.
The data were processed by Peaks X+ software and manually interpreted
to identify several chlorinated peptides of interest. The present
work shows that such specific chlorinated peptides are indeed formed
and, therefore, might serve as promising biomarkers for verification
of human exposure to chlorine.
Experimental
Procedures
Safety
Due to the potent nature of
chlorine gas, all experiments were performed in a fume hood by trained
personnel. Precautions were taken to prevent accidental exposure,
including the use of gloves and eye protection.
Chemicals
Acetic acid, ABC, calcium
hypochlorite, 3-chloro-l-tyrosine, dithiothreitol (DTT),
formic acid, pepsin from porcine gastric mucosa (≥2,500 units/mg
protein), protease from Streptomyces griseus (pronase, ≥3.5 units/mg solid), sodium acetate trihydrate,
sodium iodoacetate, trifluoroacetic acid, trypsin from the bovine
pancreas (≥10 000 BAEE units/mg protein), and urea were
obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). Acetonitrile,
acetone, and methanol were purchased from Biosolve (Valkenswaard,
The Netherlands). A peptide mixture of bovine serum albumin protein
digest (BSA, LOT #UH285651) and hydrochloric acid were obtained from
ThermoFisher Scientific (Landsmeer, The Netherlands). Additionally,
water (MilliQ, SimPak 1), 3,5-dichloro-l-tyrosine (BOC Sciences,
London, UK), and 13C6-3-chloro-l-tyrosine
(Cambridge Isotopic Laboratories, Andover MA, USA) were employed.
The purities of the agents were higher than 97%. Human plasma was
purchased from Sanquin (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
In Vitro Chlorine Exposure
The experimental
setup is visualized in Figure . Human plasma (2 mL) was transferred to a 100 mL glass laboratory
bottle. A 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube with 1, 10, and 50 mg of calcium hypochlorite
was placed in the bottle above the plasma sample. The reaction vial
was sealed with a rubber septum and parafilm. A syringe was put through
the septum, and slowly, over a time period of 1 min, 1 mL of a 12
M HCl solution was added to the calcium hypochlorite, after which
10, 100, or 500 ppm chlorine gas was generated in situ for 2 h. These
concentrations will be described as low, medium, and high concentrations
because the chlorine uptake in the plasma, the extent of adduct formation,
and the comparison between in vitro and in vivo exposure are unknown.
Also, negative controls, that is, blanks, were included without HCl
and calcium hypochlorite. The experiments were performed in triplicate
for each concentration including the blanks.
Figure 2
Experimental setup for
in vitro exposure of human plasma to in
situ generated chlorine gas. (A) Schematic view. (B) Photo of the
exposure system.
Experimental setup for
in vitro exposure of human plasma to in
situ generated chlorine gas. (A) Schematic view. (B) Photo of the
exposure system.
Protein
Precipitation and Digestion
After chlorine exposure, all
protein was precipitated by addition
of 10 mL of acetone, followed by centrifugation in a 15 mL Corning
tube at 2000 rpm for 4 min (Heraeus Megafuge 1.0R). The acetone layer
was discarded, and the steps were repeated. Afterward, the protein
precipitate was allowed to dry in the air at ambient temperature.After precipitation, the isolated protein was digested by pronase,
trypsin, or pepsin. Pronase digests the protein up to individual amino
acids, while trypsin only cleaves arginine (R) and lysine (K), resulting
in longer peptides.[36] Pepsin is a nonspecific
protease with phenylalanine (F), lysine (K), arginine (R), and proline
(P) as favored residues.[37] Pepsin and trypsin
allow analysis of specific chlorinated peptides. For pronase digestion,
3 mg of isolated protein was dissolved in 500 μL of aqueous
ammonium bicarbonate (ABC, 50 mM) and an aqueous solution of 100 μL
of pronase (10 mg/mL in 50 mM ABC). The samples were incubated overnight
in a Thermoshaker (Grant-bio PHMT) at 37 °C and 800 rpm.In addition, the protein was digested by trypsin. First, isolated
protein was dissolved in 1 mL of urea (8 M solution in 50 mM ABC),
containing 5 μL of DTT (800 mM in water). The solution was incubated
for 45 min at 37 °C and 800 rpm. After incubation, 100 μL
of sodium iodoacetate (150 mM in water) was added for carboxymethylation
of reduced cysteine residues to prevent reformation of disulfide bonds.
Subsequently, the solution was incubated for 30 min in the dark at
37 °C and 800 rpm. Afterward, the sample was filtered through
a 10 kDa Amicon ultra-centrifugal filter at 14 000 rpm for
10 min in an Eppendorf centrifuge (5417R). The residue was washed
on the filter four times with 400 μL of ABC buffer (50 mM) and
then collected and dissolved in 400 μL of water. Then, 30 μL
of trypsin solution (10 mg/mL in 50 mM acetate buffer, pH = 3.55)
was added to the dissolved residue. The sample was incubated overnight
at 37 °C and 800 rpm.In addition, the isolated protein
was dissolved in 300 μL
of pepsin solution (62.5 μg/mL formic acid). The solution was
incubated for 1.5 h at 37 °C and 800 rpm.
Sample
Preparation
After pronase
digestion, the sample was filtered through a 3 kDa Amicon ultra-centrifugal
filter at 14 000 rpm for 10 min in an Eppendorf centrifuge.
The filtrate was transferred to an LC–MS vial and analyzed
as described in Section .After trypsin and pepsin digestion, the samples were
filtrated through a 10 kDa filter at 14 000 rpm for 10 min.
To avoid pollution of the LC-Orbitrap-MS, the filtrates were purified
with reversed-phase solid-phase extraction (SPE) using a C18 column
(Bakerbond SPE). To wet the sorbent bed and activate the nonpolar
sorbents, 1 mL of methanol was percolated through the column and 1
mL of water was used to equilibrate the column. Afterward, 100 μL
of the filtrate was loaded onto the sorbent bed and washed with 1
mL of water to desalt the peptides and remove other hydrophilic compounds
from the sample matrix. The retained analytes were eluted with 1 mL
of 60% acetonitrile in water. Afterward, the sample was dried under
nitrogen and dissolved in 1 mL of water with 1% v/v formic acid. The
final elute was transferred to an LC–MS vial and analyzed as
described in section .
Chemical Analysis
LC–MS/MS
Selected Reaction Monitoring
The pronase digests were diluted
10- to 1000-fold with water depending
on the concentration prior to analysis on a Waters Acquity ultra-high
pressure liquid chromatographic (UPLC) system equipped with a Waters
Acquity HSS T3 C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm I.D., 1.8 μm).
The blanks were not further diluted, except by the addition of the
internal standard, resulting in a 1.1-fold dilution. The mobile phase
consisted of water (Eluent A) and acetonitrile (Eluent B), both with
0.2% formic acid, using a gradient at a flow of 100 μL/min.
Gradient elution started at 100% eluent A for 1 min, followed by linear
ramping to 80% eluent B in 8 min and maintaining this composition
for 2 min. After each analysis, the system was equilibrated at 100%
eluent A for 3 min. The injection volume was 5 μL at a temperature
of 8 °C. The analysis was performed at room temperature. The
UPLC system was coupled to a Waters (Milford, MA, USA) Xevo TQ-S triple-quadrupole
mass spectrometer, equipped with electrospray ionization (ESI), for
quantification of the analytes in the positive ionization mode. The
capillary voltage was set to 3.5 kV with a nitrogen cone gas flow
of 150 L/h and a cone voltage of 10 V. The collision gas argon was
set at a flow of 0.19 mL/min. Data were acquired with the selected
reaction monitoring mode. The monitored transitions were m/z 216.2 → m/z 170.3 at a collision energy (CE) of 15 eV and m/z 216.2 → m/z 135.3 (CE = 25 eV) for Cl-Tyr, m/z 250.1 → m/z 204.0 (CE =
25 eV) and m/z 250.1 → m/z 169.0 (CE = 30 eV) for di-Cl-Tyr, and m/z 222.0 → m/z 176.3 (CE = 15 eV) and m/z 222.0 → m/z 141.3 (CE =
25 eV) for the internal standard 13C6-3-chloro-l-tyrosine.
LC-HRMS/MS Data-Dependent
Acquisition
The trypsin and pepsin digests were analyzed
on an LC-HRMS/MS instrument
consisting of an Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano system (Thermo Scientific
Dionex Softron GmbH, Germany) coupled to an Orbitrap mass spectrometer
(Q Exactive plus, Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany). First, 10 μL
of the sample was injected onto an Acclaim PepMap 100 C18 μ-precolumn
(5 mm × 300 μm I.D., 5 μm, 100 Å, Thermo Fisher
Scientific) of 30 °C and washed with the loading solvent (0.05%
trifluoroacetic acid in water) at a flow of 30 μL/min for 3
min. Subsequently, the peptides were separated on an Acclaim PepMap
C18 Analytical column (250 mm × 75 μm I.D., 2 μm,
100 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a constant flow of 300 nL/min
at a temperature of 35 °C. Gradient elution started at 98% eluent
A (0.1% v/v formic acid in water), followed by a linear increase to
25% eluent B (0.1% v/v formic acid in acetonitrile) in 10 min. After
the analysis, eluent B was further increased to 80% in 5 min, and
this composition was maintained for 5 min. The column was returned
to the initial conditions in 5 min and equilibrated for 23 min. The
nanoLC system was coupled to the mass spectrometer using an EASY-spray
source. Positive ESI analysis was performed with a spray voltage of
1.5 kV. The ion-transfer capillary temperature was set at 250 °C.
A full-scan range of m/z 300–2000
was applied at a resolution of 70 000. Subsequently, data-dependent
acquisition was performed. Of each spectrum, the 10 most abundant
ions were selected for MS/MS analysis with a positive charge of 2–4
and a resolution of 17 500. The performance of the system was
checked by measuring a quality control sample of a peptide mixture
of 100 fmol BSA digest, where at least a coverage of 60% was required.
Data Analysis
The raw LC-HRMS/MS
data were analyzed using Peaks X+ software (2019, Bioinformatics Solutions
Inc., Waterloo, Canada). First, a de novo search was performed, which
calculates all theoretically possible peptides. Afterward, a PEAKS
DB Search was employed, which compared all these peptides with the
FASTA database, limiting the results to peptide sequences that were
found in the database. The de novo algorithm interprets the tandem
mass (MS/MS) spectrum of each peptide by calculating the mass differences
between fragment ions and assigning these mass differences to specific
amino acid residues. Three types of variable PTMs were selected: single
chlorination, dichlorination, and nitration of tyrosine. The maximum
allowed variable PTM per peptide was set to 8, and the maximum missed
cleavages was set to 6. The error tolerances for the precursor mass
and the fragment ion were set at 0.1 and 0.5 Da monoisotopic mass,
respectively. Each amino acid in the de novo sequence was assigned
a local confidence score. Default settings were used, while removing
peptide sequences with an average local confidence score below 50%.
From each peptide, all amino acids with a local confidence higher
than 30% were included in the de novo sequence tag of the peptides.
This tag was used for the PEAKS DB search. The resulting peptides
were exported and statistically analyzed by the open-source software
Python 3.9.5 using difflib as part of the standard python package.
The code written for this research is published under a GNU General
Public License.[38] Because spectral interpretation
was based on mass only, excluding the isotope pattern that is clearly
discernible for chlorine, the MS/MS spectra of the most relevant peptides
were also interpreted manually. Duplicate compounds, peptides with
an area smaller than 104 a.u., and peptides of nonhuman
origin were removed. In addition, only peptides that were present
in both the blank and highly exposed samples and with enhanced chlorination
in the latter were selected for further research. The percentage of
chlorinated tyrosine adducts (PoC) was calculated using eq where area0 is the response
of
the unchlorinated peptide and is
the sum of the responses of the single,
double, triple, and quadrupole chlorinated peptides, detected by LC-HRMS/MS.
The total number of observed chlorine atoms for each peptide did not
exceed 4. This calculation is based on the assumption of a uniform
MS response between native and chlorinated species of a specific peptide.
Results and Discussion
Targeted
LC–MS/MS Analysis of 3-Chlorotyrosine
and 3,5-Dichlorotyrosine
Before presenting the results of
site-specific biomarkers, the overall Cl-Tyr and di-Cl-Tyr levels
were established in a similar manner as reported by Crow et al.[21] The results of the optimization and validation
of the corresponding targeted LC–MS/MS method can be found
in Section S1 of the Supporting Information. These levels can be used to indicate for which chlorinated tyrosine
concentrations, site-specific peptides will be found, as explained
in Section . In
addition, this section will clarify that these tyrosine biomarkers
cannot always be used to distinguish victims exposed to low chlorine
levels from individuals who have not been exposed to chlorine at all.Figure shows the
detected concentrations of Cl-Tyr and di-Cl-Tyr for the various chlorine
exposure levels. The measured concentrations for the lowest exposure
level were 0.15 ± 0.04 and 0.19 ± 0.06 nmol/mg protein for
Cl-Tyr and di-Cl-Tyr, respectively. The concentration of Cl-Tyr in
this sample was only 8 times higher than the concentration in the
blank nonexposed sample. The Cl-Tyr values in the blank were above
the limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.9 pmol/mg protein and could
easily be distinguished. The di-Cl-Tyr concentration in the blank
was much lower and was consequently just below the LOQ of 0.7 pmol/mg
protein. However, it had a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of at least
6 and the ion ratio deviated less than 6% from the reference standard,
and it could therefore be identified.[39] The overall ratio between Cl-Tyr/Tyr detected by LC-HRMS/MS as depicted
in Tables S1 and S2 (Supporting Information) shows a similar tendency as the concentrations analyzed by LC–MS/MS,
although the error range of the LC-HRMS/MS results was much larger,
resulting in an overlap between medium and blank concentrations.
Figure 3
Effect
of various chlorine gas exposure levels on 3-chlorotyrosine (Cl-Tyr)
and 3,5-dichlorotyrosine
(di-Cl-Tyr) concentrations. Error bars represent ± 1SD (standard
deviation) for n = 3.
Effect
of various chlorine gas exposure levels on 3-chlorotyrosine (Cl-Tyr)
and 3,5-dichlorotyrosine
(di-Cl-Tyr) concentrations. Error bars represent ± 1SD (standard
deviation) for n = 3.To evaluate how representative these chlorotyrosine levels are
for concentrations found in the blood of exposed victims, the detected
concentrations were compared to values reported in the literature.
Nishio et al. examined the Cl-Tyr levels in an autopsy sample of a
person who possibly died of chlorine and drug poisoning and reported
a Cl-Tyr concentration of 60 ng/mL in left heart blood, analyzed by
GC–MS.[22] This is a lower concentration
than observed for the blank and the lowest exposure level in this
study (0.15 and 1.2 μg/mL blood, respectively) assuming that
blood consists of 55% plasma and the amount of protein in human plasma
is 70 mg/mL, as determined by the Bradford assay.[40] Nevertheless, many factors might influence the detected
concentration, such as the moment of sampling after death, preservation
of the samples, and matrix effects. The Cl-Tyr levels that are analyzed
by LC–MS/MS in rat and mouse models of chlorine exposure causing
labored breathing and severe lung injury[18] are slightly higher than the levels found by Nishio and are 10 times
lower than the concentrations observed at the lowest exposure level
in this study.These results show that chlorinated tyrosine
levels in an exposed
victim are not substantially higher than these values in healthy individuals.
The difference is probably even smaller for diseased people with elevated
chlorinated tyrosine levels. Being aware of the limitations of the
chlorinated tyrosine adduct method, this study aims to identify more
unambiguous biomarkers of chlorine exposure (Section .) that can be more specifically linked
to inhalation of chlorine gas.
Data-Dependent
LC-HRMS/MS Analysis of Chlorinated
Peptides
Identification of Chlorinated Peptides
In this section, the results will be described from analyzing peptide
fragments containing chlorinated tyrosine residues, rather than focusing
on the overall chlorinated tyrosine amino acid levels after pronase
digestion. In the trypsin digests, 42 peptides were identified with
LC-HRMS/MS, which could be used as potential biomarkers for chlorine
exposure. Figure shows
peptides with the average percentage of chlorinated tyrosines at various
exposure levels. A clear increase in chlorinated peptides with increasing
chlorine exposure concentration is visible. Furthermore, only a limited
number of peptides showed significant chlorination at medium chlorine
exposure as chlorination of most peptides is only observed at the
highest chlorine concentration. A vast majority of the peptides show
either no modification or a single chlorination. Double chlorination
was only observed for the peptides YQQKPGKAPK, YLYEIAR, and HYEGSTVPEK.
The same trends are visible for the eight peptides that were identified
as potential biomarkers after pepsin digestion (Figure S2 and Table
S1, Supporting Information). An extensive
overview of the identified biomarkers with the corresponding mass
and retention time can be found in Table S3 of the Supporting Information. Two chlorinated biomarkers were detected
in both the trypsin and pepsin digests, and these were chlorinated
at the same tyrosine amino acid position. Additionally, not all biomarkers
were detected in all repetitions at the highest concentration. This
might be due to variation in the sample preparation efficacy and chlorine
uptake of the plasma sample. The combination of various digestion
methods enabled the identification of more peptides than with a single
digestion method, and consequently a larger part of the protein sequence
was covered. The coverage of human serum album and haptoglobin was
56 and 33%, respectively (Figure S4, Supporting Information). It should be noted that a few chlorinated peptides
were detected in the blank and low exposure levels and not in higher
chlorine exposure levels, although the blood plasma of the same donor
was used. This unexpected finding was not investigated further as
these peptides were not considered to be suitable markers for chlorine
exposure.
Figure 4
Heatmap of peptides identified with LC-HRMS/MS after trypsin digestion
of human blood plasma, with the corresponding average percentage of
chlorinated tyrosines (PoC) for no exposure and low, medium, and high
chlorine exposure.
Heatmap of peptides identified with LC-HRMS/MS after trypsin digestion
of human blood plasma, with the corresponding average percentage of
chlorinated tyrosines (PoC) for no exposure and low, medium, and high
chlorine exposure.Table lists the
most promising chlorinated peptides as biomarkers for exogeneous chlorine
exposure. Because trypsin can cleave the protein on various amino
acids and the efficiency is not 100%, the length of some chlorinated
peptides varied slightly. The additional amino acids that were occasionally
found are indicated with a dot notation of the chlorinated peptide
sequence. All peptides were found to be unchlorinated in the blank
samples and chlorinated at high chlorine exposure levels. The chlorinated
variants of the peptides HY*EGSTVPEK, TY*ETTLEK, Y*KPGQTVK, Y*LY*EIAR,
and Y*QQKPGQAPR were detected in the medium chlorine exposure samples
as well. This indicates that these peptides might even be used in
case a lower concentration of chlorine exposure occurs. Two of these
peptides were found to have a single and double chlorinated tyrosine:
HY*EGSTVPEK with either one or two chlorines on the tyrosine and Y*LY*EIAR
with one to three chlorines attached, where the second tyrosine could
be dichlorinated. This might be a region of, respectively, the haptoglobin
or albumin protein which is more readily accessible to chlorine.
Table 1
Overview of Peptides Containing at
Least One Chlorinated Tyrosine Residue, Present in the Precipitated
Proteins from Human Plasma Exposed to Various Chlorine Concentrations
blank peptide
chlorinated
peptide
protein
accession
HYEGSTVPEK
HY(Cl)EGSTVPEK.K
haptoglobin
P00738|HPT_HUMAN
HY(Cl2)EGSTVPEK.K
haptoglobin
P00738|HPT_HUMAN
TYETTLEK
TY(Cl)ETTLEK
albumin
P02768|ALBU_HUMAN
YKPGQTVK
SI.Y(Cl)KPGQTVK
alpha-2-macroglobulin
P01023|A2MG_HUMAN
YLYEIAR
KK.Y(Cl)LYEIAR
albumin
P02768|ALBU_HUMAN
K.Y(Cl)LY(Cl)EIAR
albumin
P02768|ALBU_HUMAN
Y(Cl)LY(Cl2)EIAR
albumin
P02768|ALBU_HUMAN
YQQKPGQAPR
Y(Cl)QQKPGQAPR
immunoglobulin kappa variable 3–20
P01619|KV320_HUMAN
Interestingly,
other studies have indicated that the peptide Y*LY*EIAR
can become (mono and di) nitrated but not chlorinated under physiological
conditions.[35,42] Additionally, LAK*TYETTLEK has
also been reported as a biomarker for retrospective detection of human
exposure to the nerve agent tabun, with K* as the site of modification.[43]The Peaks X+ software facilitated rapid
analysis and evaluation
of the many MS/MS spectra. Furthermore, interpreting each MS/MS spectrum
according to the same fixed set of rules reduces human bias, which
is important from a forensic point of view. Nevertheless, both the
automated analysis and its results require critical human expert evaluation.
Error tolerance thresholds for the parent and fragment ion masses
turned out to be of significant influence on the identified peptides
and the modifications. This is essential because only mass differences
are used for identification of the chlorine PTMs, while other relevant
information, such as the isotope pattern, is not incorporated as this
can hamper protein identification rates.[44,45] In addition, the isomers of Y(Cl)LYEIAR and Y(Cl)LY(Cl2)EIAR were only found manually due to their trace level and the applied
concentration threshold settings.In future research, it would
be interesting to examine potential
differences between short-term exposure to a high concentration of
chlorine gas and long-term low-level exposure. Because of the persistence
of blood protein adducts, it is conceivable that the chlorination
is cumulative, which may result in a higher concentration of chlorinated
biomarkers for low-level long-term exposure than is expected based
on a single exposure. Hence, the degree of monochlorination versus
dichlorination and the chlorination-to-nitration ratio of tyrosine
residues might be useful to investigate exposure conditions.[21,35]Additionally, it should be emphasized that the in vitro chlorine
gas exposure setup represents a simplified model in relation to actual
human exposure and does not account for chemical and biological interactions
that take place in the various parts of the human body. It is still
under debate whether Cl2 is fully converted to HOCl and
HCl in wet tissues before it reacts with biological molecules or that
it will predominantly react with biological compounds before it can
undergo hydrolysis. A comprehensive theoretical review by Squadrito
et al. suggests that direct reaction of Cl2 with biological
molecules is kinetically favored.[46] However,
other authors state, based on in vitro experiments, that hypochlorous
acid (HOCl) reacts with amino acids and triggers an inflammatory response
in the lungs as a result of chlorine exposure.[2,47,48] For this reason, verification of the chlorinated
peptide biomarkers in samples of chlorine-exposed victims is required
to establish their value for forensic practice.
Mass Spectrometric Approach for Assigning
Chlorinated Peptides
The following section discusses the
LC-HRMS/MS analysis of two of the chlorinated peptides, that is, Y*LY*EIAR
and HY*EGSTVPEK, in more detail. Figure shows the extracted ion chromatograms (EICs)
of the mono-, di-, and trichlorinated peptide Y*LY*EIAR in plasma
exposed to the highest chlorine concentration, with the corresponding
retention times (tR). The results for
the blanks and plasma exposed to other concentrations are shown in
the Supporting Information (Figure S4).
No chlorinated peptides were detected in the blank. Two peaks are
visible at m/z 481.23 (one chlorine
atom) and m/z 515.19 (three chlorine
atoms) because either the first or the second tyrosine can exhibit
(di)chlorination. In the full scan MS spectrum of this doubly charged
peptide, a distinct chlorine pattern is visible for single, double,
and triple chlorination (Figure B–D). The unchlorinated peptide showed a single
peak as expected (Figure A). Table S4 in the Supporting Information demonstrates the excellent correlation of the measured versus theoretical
isotope ratios for the acquired data.[49]Figure shows the
MS/MS spectrum of the monochlorinated peptide Y(Cl)LYEIAR. All y-ions
were found, and their m/z ions are
shown in the spectrum. The highest m/z 961.5 corresponds to the protonated ion [M + H+] of the
peptide. The corresponding y-ions and the theoretical b-ions can be
found in Table S5 of the Supporting Information. The MS/MS spectra and the corresponding fragmentation pattern of
the di- and trichlorinated peptide YLYEIAR are shown in Figures S5–S6
and Tables S6 and S7 of the Supporting Information.
Figure 5
EICs of plasma exposed to the high chlorine exposure concentration
analyzed by LC-HRMS/MS, with YLYEIAR at m/z 464.25 and tR = 20.1–20.7
min (blue), Y(Cl)LYEIAR and YLY(Cl)EIAR at m/z 481.23 and tR = 20.8–21.0
and 21.0–21.2 min (red), K.Y(Cl)LY(Cl)EIAR at m/z 562.26 and tR = 20.6–20.8
min (orange), and Y(Cl)LY(Cl2)EIAR and Y(Cl2)LY(Cl)EIAR at m/z 515.19 and tR = 21.7–21.9 and 21.9–22.0 min
(green).
Figure 6
Full scan MS spectrum analyzed by LC-HRMS/MS
of doubly charged
chlorinated precursor Y*LY*EIAR showing the chlorine isotope pattern:
(A) no chlorination, (B) single chlorination with an isotope ratio
of around 2:1, (C) double chlorination of K.Y*LY*EIAR with an isotope
ratio of 5:4:1, and D) triple chlorination with an isotope ratio of
11:12:5:1.
Figure 7
MS/MS spectrum of the parent ion Y(Cl)LYEIAR
with an m/z 481.233 at a tR of 20.76 min, present
in the precipitated proteins from human plasma exposed to medium and
high concentrations of chlorine gas. The m/z of the y-fragments and the corresponding amino acids are
shown.
EICs of plasma exposed to the high chlorine exposure concentration
analyzed by LC-HRMS/MS, with YLYEIAR at m/z 464.25 and tR = 20.1–20.7
min (blue), Y(Cl)LYEIAR and YLY(Cl)EIAR at m/z 481.23 and tR = 20.8–21.0
and 21.0–21.2 min (red), K.Y(Cl)LY(Cl)EIAR at m/z 562.26 and tR = 20.6–20.8
min (orange), and Y(Cl)LY(Cl2)EIAR and Y(Cl2)LY(Cl)EIAR at m/z 515.19 and tR = 21.7–21.9 and 21.9–22.0 min
(green).Full scan MS spectrum analyzed by LC-HRMS/MS
of doubly charged
chlorinated precursor Y*LY*EIAR showing the chlorine isotope pattern:
(A) no chlorination, (B) single chlorination with an isotope ratio
of around 2:1, (C) double chlorination of K.Y*LY*EIAR with an isotope
ratio of 5:4:1, and D) triple chlorination with an isotope ratio of
11:12:5:1.MS/MS spectrum of the parent ion Y(Cl)LYEIAR
with an m/z 481.233 at a tR of 20.76 min, present
in the precipitated proteins from human plasma exposed to medium and
high concentrations of chlorine gas. The m/z of the y-fragments and the corresponding amino acids are
shown.The monochlorinated peptide HY*EGSTVPEKK
showed the highest intensity
compared to all chlorinated peptides in both the medium and highly
exposed samples and is present as an unchlorinated peptide in the
blank. Because of its relevance, the EICs of the mono- and dichlorinated
peptide HY*EGSTVPEKK in plasma exposed to the highest chlorine concentration
are shown in Figure . The results for the blank samples and plasma exposed to other concentrations
are presented in the Supporting Information (Figure S7). The MS/MS spectrum corresponding to HY(Cl)EGSTVPEKK
is shown in Figure . All y-fragments and the [M + H+] precursor ion were
found and depicted in Table S8 in the Supporting Information. Also, all except one of the b-fragments could
be identified in the spectrum. The MS/MS spectrum and the corresponding
fragmentation pattern of the dichlorinated peptide HY*EGSTVPEKK is
shown in Figure S8 and Table S9 of the Supporting Information.
Figure 8
EICs of plasma exposed to the highest chlorine concentration
analyzed
by LC-HRMS/MS, with HYEGSTVPEKK at m/z 637.823 and tR = 14.3–15.0 min
(blue), HY(Cl)EGSTVPEKK at m/z 654.805
and tR = 14.9–15.0 min (red), and
HY(Cl2)EGSTVPEKK at m/z 671.785 and tR = 15.2–15.3 min
(orange).
Figure 9
MS/MS spectrum of the parent ion HY(Cl)EGSTVPEKK
with an m/z 654.804 at an tR of 14.88 min, detected in the trypsin digest
of a plasma
sample exposed to medium and high concentrations of chlorine gas.
The m/z of the y-fragments and the
corresponding amino acids are shown.
EICs of plasma exposed to the highest chlorine concentration
analyzed
by LC-HRMS/MS, with HYEGSTVPEKK at m/z 637.823 and tR = 14.3–15.0 min
(blue), HY(Cl)EGSTVPEKK at m/z 654.805
and tR = 14.9–15.0 min (red), and
HY(Cl2)EGSTVPEKK at m/z 671.785 and tR = 15.2–15.3 min
(orange).MS/MS spectrum of the parent ion HY(Cl)EGSTVPEKK
with an m/z 654.804 at an tR of 14.88 min, detected in the trypsin digest
of a plasma
sample exposed to medium and high concentrations of chlorine gas.
The m/z of the y-fragments and the
corresponding amino acids are shown.
Chlorinated Sites in Human Serum Albumin
To better understand the protein structure and interactions, the
positions of the chlorinated tyrosine residues in human serum albumin
are visualized in Figure . The locations of the identified chlorinated peptides are
marked in Figure A. Figure B,C shows
a magnification of the Y138 and Y140 sites of the single chlorinated
peptides Y(Cl)LYEIAR and YLY(Cl)EIAR, respectively.
In the current study, 50
chlorinated peptides have been identified
after in vitro exposure of human plasma to chlorine. These peptides
could potentially serve as biomarkers to verify exogeneous chlorine
exposure in humans. Within this set, five chlorinated peptides were
considered to be especially promising biomarkers due to their consistent
presence in chlorine exposure samples, the occurrence of multiple
degrees of chlorination, and the presence of the unchlorinated peptide
in the blank. These peptides, HYEGSTVPEK, TYETTLEK, YKPGQTVK, YLYEIAR,
and YQQKPGQAPR, have been detected in the medium exposure concentration
samples as well and can be valuable when considering actual samples
of potential chlorine exposure victims. Since most of these peptides
are derived from proteins that are abundantly present in whole blood,
forensic scientists might be able to assess alleged chlorine exposures
in a relatively straightforward way. Because the current study works
with a simplified in vitro exposure system, subsequent validation
of these biomarkers in authentic biomedical samples is, however, pivotal.
Nonetheless, the developed method allows for robust and specific analysis
of chlorinated adducts formed in blood. Such biomarkers might be used
to discriminate between endogenous processes and exogeneous exposure,
which is particularly relevant for forensic cases with multiple plausible
explanations or in which suspected parties strongly deny the use of
chlorine gas as a chemical warfare agent.
Authors: David A Ford; Jaideep Honavar; Carolyn J Albert; Mark A Duerr; Joo Yeun Oh; Stephen Doran; Sadis Matalon; Rakesh P Patel Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Brian S Crow; Jennifer Quiñones-González; Brooke G Pantazides; Jonas W Perez; W Rucks Winkeljohn; Joshua W Garton; Jerry D Thomas; Thomas A Blake; Rudolph C Johnson Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2016-03-13 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Jie Zheng; Timothy S Strutzenberg; Adrian Reich; Venkatasubramanian Dharmarajan; Bruce D Pascal; Gogce C Crynen; Scott J Novick; Ruben D Garcia-Ordonez; Patrick R Griffin Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 6.986