| Literature DB >> 35622781 |
Carolina Beppi1,2,3,4, Marco Penner2, Dominik Straumann1,2,3,4, Stefan Yu Bögli2,3,4.
Abstract
A mild traumatic brain injury is a neurological dysfunction caused by biomechanical forces transmitted to the brain in physical impacts. The current understanding of the neuropathological cascade resulting in the manifested clinical signs and symptoms is limited due to the absence of sensitive brain imaging methods. Zebrafish are established models for the reproduction and study of neurobiological pathologies. However, all available models mostly recreate moderate-to-severe focal injuries in adult zebrafish. The present work has induced a mild brain trauma in larval zebrafish through a non-invasive biomechanical approach. A custom-made apparatus with a commercially available motor was employed to expose larvae to rapidly decelerating linear movements. The neurophysiological changes following concussion were assessed through behavioural quantifications of startle reflex locomotor distance and habituation metrics. Here we show that the injury was followed, within five minutes, by a transient anxiety state and CNS dysfunction manifested by increased startle responsivity with impaired startle habituation, putatively mirroring the human clinical sign of hypersensitivity to noise. Within a day after the injury, chronic effects arose, as evidenced by an overall reduced responsivity to sensory stimulation (lower amplitude and distance travelled along successive stimuli), reflecting the human post-concussive symptomatology. This study represents a step forward towards the establishment of a parsimonious (simple, less ethically concerning, yet sensitive) animal model of mild TBI. Our behavioural findings mimic aspects of acute and chronic effects of human concussion, which warrant further study at molecular, cellular and circuit levels. While our model opens wide avenues for studying the underlying cellular and molecular pathomechanisms, it also enables high-throughput testing of therapeutic interventions to accelerate post-concussive recovery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35622781 PMCID: PMC9140253 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1Concussion procedure.
(A) Illustration of the mounting of the cylindrical capsule (containing fish in water) on the holder, following the numerical order of the panels. The capsule’s black lid was provided, on its side exposed to water, of a convex rounded protuberance of smaller diameter than the cylindrical capsule (2). This shape allowed any air contained in the capsule to be expelled by pressure when the lid was placed on top of the capsule (containing fish in water). The lid-covered capsule was placed on the holder, which had a cylindrical cavity (size-matching the capsule’s diameter) that prevented the capsule from moving side-wise (A1-A3). The screws on the sides were then used to securely lock the capsule (3,4). (B) Illustration of the movement performed by the motor: the capsule is slowly brought up to the start position (B1) and rapidly slides down to the end position (B2) with the parameters described in the following panels. (C) Features of the linear movement plotted as a function of time (ms): position, velocity, acceleration and jerk.
Fig 2Startle responses over test-times.
Mean distance travelled (+/-1 SE) at each stimulus, for both groups (N = 72, each), at each time point (A-F). Total distance travelled after 20 vibratory stimuli (M +/-1 SE) for both groups (N = 72, each) at each time point (G). A 2x6 mixed ANOVA (Ncontrol = 72, Nconcussed = 72) was run. No significant main effect of group (F(1,142) = 0.499, p>0.05) on the mean TDT20 was found, with controls (M = 33.724, SE = 1.446) and concussed (M = 32.28, SE = 1.446) performing similarly overall. A significant main effect of time (F(4.365,619.792) = 2.559, p = 0.033) was observed, although without significant differences at the pairwise level. The effect of time was different for the control and concussed group (G), as confirmed by a significant interaction between group and time (F(4.365, 619.792) = 5.644, p<0.001). The interaction effect was then broken down through two one-way repeated-measures ANOVAs, which analysed the effect of time (six levels) for the control and concussed groups separately. For the control group (N = 72) there was a significant effect of time (F(4.137,293.712) = 4.825,p<0.001). Pairwise comparisons further indicated that the mean TDT20 was significantly higher at time 6 (24-h P-I, M = 41.885, SE = 2.655) than at time 2 (5-min P-I, M = 29.406, SE = 1.859) with p<0.001, at time 3 (40-min P-I, M = 29.975, SE = 1.898) with p = 0.004. A significant effect of time (F(4.069,288.933) = 3.403, p = 0.009) was found also for the concussed group, whose mean TDT20 was significantly lower at time 4 (70-min P-I, M = 27.547, SE = 2.018) compared to time 2 (5-min P-I, M = 39.142, SE = 3.027) with p < .001. No additional statistical differences at pairwise levels were observed.
Fig 3Population-level habituation descriptives.
Descriptive statistics for the mean (+/- 1 SE) amplitude (A, D, G), decay constant (B, E, H) and offset (C, F, I) of 500 bootstraps, for both groups (control and concussed), at baseline, 5 minutes and 24 hours P-I. Change (mean +/- 2 SE) in amplitude (J), decay constant (K) and offset (L) over the same 3 test-times.