| Literature DB >> 35622776 |
Khizar Hayat1,2,3, Ali Raza4, Aitzaz Anas5, Anas Sarwar Qureshi2, Sarmad Rehan2, Ameer Hamza Rabbani6, Hafiz Faseeh Ur Rehman3, Abdul Ghaffar Qamar7, Tayyab Rehman2, Farah Deeba4, Amber Salman8.
Abstract
The present study was designed to elucidate a relationship between lymphoid organs and reproductive activity in male Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) bred in a temperate region of Pakistan (30.3753° N, 69.3451° E) in response to photoperiodic changes. The research focused primarily on the relative morphological changes in primary (thymus and bursa of Fabricius) and secondary (spleen) lymphoid organs with respect to seasonal variations in the histomorphometry of testicular tissue. For this purpose, a comparable number of clinically healthy Japanese quails were exsanguinated during active (April-May), regressive (September-October) and inactive (January-February) reproductive phases. Following an extensive gross measurement of lymphoid and reproductive organs, a histomorphometric analysis was performed on sampled tissues by employing ImageJ® software. Blood was collected for hormonal and leukocytic analysis. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical comparison. Testes had the highest parenchymal development in the active phase (80.66 ± 21.22 µm) and the lowest in the inactive phase (27.80 ± 7.22 µm). Conversely, a percentage change was evident in the sizes of primary (bursa: 61.5%, thymus: 46.9%) and secondary (spleen: 23.9%) lymphoid organs during inactive and active reproductive phases. This study demonstrated that a physiological trade-off is imperative between immune and reproductive systems for optimum survivability and reproductive performance.Entities:
Keywords: androgens; avian immune system; avian reproductive system; histomorphometry; photoperiod
Year: 2022 PMID: 35622776 PMCID: PMC9147197 DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9050248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Sci ISSN: 2306-7381
Gross anatomical measurements of different organs of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) during different reproductive phases.
| Parameter | Annual Reproductive Season | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Season | Regressive Season | Nonactive Season | |
| Testes | |||
| Absolute Weight (g) | 1.28 ± 0.16 a | 0.46 ± 0.12 b | 0.44 ± 0.14 b |
| Relative Weight (%) | 1.74 ± 0.17 a | 1.2 ± 0.12 b | 0.55 ± 0.13 c |
| Length (cm) | 2.07 ± 0.12 a | 1.51 ± 0.15 b | 0.71 ± 0.1 c |
| Width (cm) | 1.66 ± 0.13 a | 1.05 ± 0.02 b | 0.57 ± 0.07 c |
| Bursa of Fabricius | |||
| Absolute Weight (g) | 0.18 ± 0.04 b | 0.19 ± 0.06 b | 0.26 ± 0.05 a |
| Relative Weight (%) | 0.25 ± 0.07 c | 0.27 ± 0.035 b | 0.36 ± 0.04 a |
| Length (cm) | 0.98 ± 0.05 b | 1.13 ± 0.02 b | 1.45 ± 0.09 a |
| Width (cm) | 0.26 ± 0.04 c | 0.49 ± 0.05 b | 0.71 ± 0.07 a |
| Thymus | |||
| Absolute Weight (g) | 0.11 ± 0.06 c | 0.23 ± 0.04 b | 0.36 ± 0.07 a |
| Relative Weight (%) | 0.16 ± 0.01 c | 0.29 ± 0.03 b | 0.45 ± 0.08 a |
| Spleen | |||
| Absolute Weight (g) | 0.19 ± 0.03 c | 0.27 ± 0.05 b | 0.54 ± 0.04 a |
| Relative Weight (%) | 0.24 ± 0.08 b | 0.31 ± 0.07 b | 0.60 ± 0.07 a |
| Diameter (cm) | 0.78 ± 0.02 c | 1.1 ± 0.06 b | 1.65 ± 0.07 a |
All values are represented as mean ± SD, whereby different superscripts (a,b,c) are used to identify a statistical significance of p < 0.05.
Figure 1Graphical representation of gross morphometric values of organs (testes, bursa of Fabricius, thymus and spleen) in different phases of a reproductive season. AW: Average weight, RW: Relative weight, L: Length, W: Width and D: Diameter. All values are represented as means ± SEM, and parameters with different superscripts (a,b,c) are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Boxplot representing histomorphometric parameters in immune organs during active (A), regressive (B) and inactive breeding phases (C). All values are represented with their median, and upper and lower quartiles are shown in the above figure. Overlapping whiskers between different seasons show a relatively lower level of significance as compared to the ones in the which the difference is greater. Parameters with different superscripts (a,b,c) are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Histomorphometric analysis of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) during different reproductive phases.
| Parameter | Annual Reproductive Season | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Phase | Regressive Phase | Nonactive Phase | |
| Testes | |||
| Diameter of seminiferous tubules (µm) | 203.37 ± 65.22 a | 151.71 ± 28.22 b | 91.04 ± 11.41 b |
| Height of spermatogenic epithelium (µm) | 80.66 ± 21.22 a | 37.06 ± 9.67 b | 27.80 ± 7.22 c |
| Lumen of seminiferous tubules (µm) | 122.71 ± 9.98 b | 114.4 ± 15.93 b | 63.24 ± 19.11 a |
| Thickness of tunica albuginea (µm) | 86.81 ± 17.75 b | 105.29 ± 22.15 b | 191.10 ± 26.85 a |
| Bursa of Fabricius | |||
| Diameter of follicles (µm) | 195.5 ± 58.54 c | 271.13 ± 69.39 b | 508.52 ± 91.06 a |
| Thickness of capsule (µm) | 213.46 ± 78.49 a | 101.42 ± 37.08 b | 48.51 ± 23.94 c |
| Epithelial height (µm) | 4.57 ± 1.09 a | 3.61 ± 0.73 a | 2.53 ± 0.4 a |
| Thymus | |||
| Mean diameter of thymic lobule (µm) | 105.63 ± 2.59 c | 156.73 ± 5.47 b | 199.01 ± 7.03 a |
| Diameter of thymic corpuscle (µm) | 12.11 ± 1.34 a | 15.16 ± 2.71 a | 18.79 ± 3.25 a |
| Spleen | |||
| Diameter of splenic nodule (µm) | 324.58 ± 33.34 b | 383.74 ± 28.86 b | 426.52 ± 29.47 a |
| Thickness of capsule (µm) | 46.68 ± 11.96 b | 57.74 ± 12.03 b | 82.19 ± 14.57 a |
All values are represented as mean ± SD, whereby different superscripts (a,b,c) are used to identify a statistical significance of p < 0.05.
Figure 3Photomicrographs of testes of Japanese quails during different breeding phases of annual reproductive cycle. (a) Active breeding phase, (b) Regressive breeding phase and (c) Inactive breeding phase. Curved black arrows demonstrate the measurement of diameter; green arrows show the lumen of seminiferous tubules, and red arrows show height of spermatogenic epithelium. (H&E 200X).
Figure 4Photomicrographs of spleen of Japanese quails during different breeding phases of annual reproductive cycle. (a) Active breeding phase, (b) Regressive breeding phase and (c) Inactive breeding phase. Red circles show the splenic nodule (present in white pulp) of spleen (H&E 200X).
Figure 5Photomicrographs of bursa of Fabricius of Japanese quails during different breeding phases of annual reproductive cycle. (a) Active breeding phase, (b) Regressive breeding phase and (c) Inactive breeding phase. Red circles show the bursal nodule; black arrows show the epithelium of bursa, and red arrows show bursal capsule (H&E 200X).
Immune and hormonal analysis of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) during different reproductive phases.
| Parameter | Annual Reproductive Season | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Phase | Regressive Phase | Nonactive Phase | |
| Immunological Analysis | |||
| Total Leukocyte Count (×103/µL) | 109.5 ± 1.95 a | 157.25 ± 2.37 b | 189.3 ± 6.53 c |
| Lymphocyte Count (×103/µL) | 79.34 ± 2.79 a | 113.94 ± 3.16 b | 137.18 ± 4.92 c |
| Hormonal Analysis | |||
| Serum Testosterone (ng/mL) | 2.45 ± 0.035 a | 0.60 ± 0.024 b | 0.27 ± 0.011 c |
All values are represented as mean ± SD, whereby different superscripts (a,b,c) are used to identify a statistical significance of p < 0.05.