Literature DB >> 24682843

Coronary artery disease severity and aortic stenosis: clinical outcomes according to SYNTAX score in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Giulio G Stefanini1, Stefan Stortecky1, Davide Cao1, Julie Rat-Wirtzler2, Crochan J O'Sullivan1, Steffen Gloekler1, Lutz Buellesfeld1, Ahmed A Khattab1, Fabian Nietlispach1, Thomas Pilgrim1, Christoph Huber3, Thierry Carrel3, Bernhard Meier1, Peter Jüni2, Peter Wenaweser4, Stephan Windecker1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether coronary artery disease (CAD) severity exerts a gradient of risk in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 445 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI were included into a prospective registry between 2007 and 2012. The preoperative SYNTAX score (SS) was determined from baseline coronary angiograms. In case of revascularization prior to TAVI, residual SS (rSS) was also determined. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients without CAD (n = 158), patients with low SS (0-22, n = 207), and patients with high SS (SS > 22, n = 80). The pre-specified primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI). At 1 year, CAD severity was associated with higher rates of the primary endpoint (no CAD: 12.5%, low SS: 16.1%, high SS: 29.6%; P = 0.016). This was driven by differences in cardiovascular mortality (no CAD: 8.6%, low SS: 13.6%, high SS: 20.4%; P = 0.029), whereas the risk of stroke (no CAD: 5.1%, low SS: 3.3%, high SS: 6.7%; P = 0.79) and MI (no CAD: 1.5%, low SS: 1.1%, high SS: 4.0%; P = 0.54) was similar across the three groups. Patients with high SS received less complete revascularization as indicated by a higher rSS (21.2 ± 12.0 vs. 4.0 ± 4.4, P < 0.001) compared with patients with low SS. High rSS tertile (> 14) was associated with higher rates of the primary endpoint at 1 year (no CAD:12.5%, low rSS: 16.5%, high rSS: 26.3%, P = 0.043).
CONCLUSIONS: Severity of CAD appears to be associated with impaired clinical outcomes at 1 year after TAVI. Patients with SS > 22 receive less complete revascularization and have a higher risk of cardiovascular death, stroke, or MI than patients without CAD or low SS. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Coronary artery disease; SYNTAX score; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24682843     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  19 in total

Review 1.  Coronary Revascularisation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Candidates: Why, Who, When?

Authors:  Davide Cao; Mauro Chiarito; Paolo Pagnotta; Bernhard Reimers; Giulio G Stefanini
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

2.  Revascularizing coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Rafail A Kotronias; Mamas A Mamas; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Coronary artery disease and myocardial revascularization in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Raffaele Piccolo; Anna Franzone; Thomas Pilgrim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Assessment, treatment, and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.

Authors:  Edward Danson; Peter Hansen; Sayan Sen; Justin Davies; Ian Meredith; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Pre-TAVR: Current State of the Evidence.

Authors:  Lukas S Keller; Vassili Panagides; Jules Mesnier; Jorge Nuche; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 6.  Calcific aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Marie-Annick Clavel; Patrick Mathieu; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Catherine M Otto; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 52.329

7.  A Glimpse into the Future: In 2020, Which Patients will Undergo TAVI or SAVR?

Authors:  Crochan J O'Sullivan; Peter Wenaweser
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-05

8.  Clinical Outcome of Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease Not Treated According to Current Recommendations.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Gioia; Mariano Pellicano; Gabor G Toth; Filip Casselman; Julien Adjedj; Frank Van Praet; Bernard Stockman; Ivan Degrieck; Bruno Trimarco; William Wijns; Bernard De Bruyne; Emanuele Barbato
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Impact of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Insights from the FRANCE-2 registry.

Authors:  Etienne Puymirat; Romain Didier; Hélène Eltchaninoff; Bernard Lung; Jean-Philippe Collet; Dominique Himbert; Eric Durand; Alain Leguerrier; Pascal Leprince; Jean Fajadet; Emmanuel Teiger; Karine Chevreul; Michel Lièvre; Didier Tchetché; Florence Leclercq; Stéphan Chassaing; Hervé Le Breton; Patrick Donzeau-Gouge; Thierry Lefèvre; Didier Carrié; Martine Gillard; Didier Blanchard
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 10.  Coronary Assessment and Revascularization Before Transcutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation: An Update on Current Knowledge.

Authors:  Muhammad Sabbah; Thomas Engstrøm; Ole De Backer; Lars Søndergaard; Jacob Lønborg
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.