Literature DB >> 35622208

Design of a Mechanobioreactor to Apply Anisotropic, Biaxial Strain to Large Thin Biomaterials for Tissue Engineered Heart Valve Applications.

Edwin Wong1,2,3, Shouka Parvin Nejad4,5, Katya A D'Costa4,5, Nataly Machado Siqueira4,5, Monica Lecce4,5, J Paul Santerre4,5,6, Craig A Simmons7,8,9.   

Abstract

Repair and replacement solutions for congenitally diseased heart valves capable of post-surgery growth and adaptation have remained elusive. Tissue engineered heart valves (TEHVs) offer a potential biological solution that addresses the drawbacks of existing valve replacements. Typically, TEHVs are made from thin, fibrous biomaterials that either become cell populated in vitro or in situ. Often, TEHV designs poorly mimic the anisotropic mechanical properties of healthy native valves leading to inadequate biomechanical function. Mechanical conditioning of engineered tissues with anisotropic strain application can induce extracellular matrix remodelling to alter the anisotropic mechanical properties of a construct, but implementation has been limited to small-scale set-ups. To address this limitation for TEHV applications, we designed and built a mechanobioreactor capable of modulating biaxial strain anisotropy applied to large, thin, biomaterial sheets in vitro. The bioreactor can independently control two orthogonal stretch axes to modulate applied strain anisotropy on biomaterial sheets from 13 × 13 mm2 to 70 × 40 mm2. A design of experiments was performed using experimentally validated finite element (FE) models and demonstrated that biaxial strain was applied uniformly over a larger percentage of the cell seeded area for larger sheets (13 × 13 mm2: 58% of sheet area vs. 52 × 31 mm2: 86% of sheet area). Furthermore, bioreactor prototypes demonstrated that over 70% of the cell seeding area remained uniformly strained under different prescribed protocols: equibiaxial amplitudes between 5 to 40%, cyclic frequencies between 0.1 to 2.5 Hz and anisotropic strain ratios between 0:1 (constrained uniaxial) to 2:1. Lastly, proof-of-concept experiments were conducted where we applied equibiaxial (εx = εy = 8.75%) and anisotropic (εx = 12.5%, εy = 5%) strain protocols to cell-seeded, electrospun scaffolds. Cell nuclei and F-actin aligned to the vector-sum strain direction of each prescribed protocol (nuclei alignment: equibiaxial: 43.2° ± 1.8°, anisotropic: 17.5° ± 1.7°; p < 0.001). The abilities of this bioreactor to prescribe different strain amplitude, frequency and strain anisotropy protocols to cell-seeded scaffolds will enable future studies into the effects of anisotropic loading protocols on mechanically conditioned TEHVs and other engineered planar connective tissues.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Biomedical Engineering Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anisotropic biaxial strain; Biaxial stretch bioreactor; Design of experiments; Heart valve tissue engineering; Parametric finite element modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35622208     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-02984-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   4.219


  40 in total

1.  The pipeline still leaks and more than you think: a status report on gender diversity in biomedical engineering.

Authors:  Naomi C Chesler; Gilda Barabino; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Strain uniformity in biaxial specimens is highly sensitive to attachment details.

Authors:  Armin Eilaghi; John G Flanagan; G Wayne Brodland; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Effects of a combined mechanical stimulation protocol: Value for skeletal muscle tissue engineering.

Authors:  Kristel J M Boonen; Marloes L P Langelaan; Roderick B Polak; Daisy W J van der Schaft; Frank P T Baaijens; Mark J Post
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Role of boundary conditions in determining cell alignment in response to stretch.

Authors:  Kellen Chen; Andrea Vigliotti; Mattia Bacca; Robert M McMeeking; Vikram S Deshpande; Jeffrey W Holmes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Next-generation tissue-engineered heart valves with repair, remodelling and regeneration capacity.

Authors:  Emanuela S Fioretta; Sarah E Motta; Valentina Lintas; Sandra Loerakker; Kevin K Parker; Frank P T Baaijens; Volkmar Falk; Simon P Hoerstrup; Maximilian Y Emmert
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Acute In Vivo Functional Assessment of a Biodegradable Stentless Elastomeric Tricuspid Valve.

Authors:  Garrett N Coyan; Lindemberg da Mota Silveira-Filho; Yasumoto Matsumura; Samuel K Luketich; William Katz; Vinay Badhwar; William R Wagner; Antonio D'Amore
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Computational modeling guides tissue-engineered heart valve design for long-term in vivo performance in a translational sheep model.

Authors:  Maximilian Y Emmert; Boris A Schmitt; Sandra Loerakker; Bart Sanders; Hendrik Spriestersbach; Emanuela S Fioretta; Leon Bruder; Kerstin Brakmann; Sarah E Motta; Valentina Lintas; Petra E Dijkman; Laura Frese; Felix Berger; Frank P T Baaijens; Simon P Hoerstrup
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Modulation of collagen fiber orientation by strain-controlled enzymatic degradation.

Authors:  S Ghazanfari; A Driessen-Mol; C V C Bouten; F P T Baaijens
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 9.  Which Biological Properties of Heart Valves Are Relevant to Tissue Engineering?

Authors:  Adrian H Chester; K Jane Grande-Allen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.