| Literature DB >> 35621982 |
Abdel Nasser B Singab1,2, Nada M Mostafa1, Yasmin A Elkhawas3, Eman Al-Sayed1, Mokhtar M Bishr4, Ahmed M Elissawy1,2, Mohamed S Elnaggar1, Iten M Fawzy5, Osama M Salama3, Yi-Hong Tsai6,7, Fang-Rong Chang6,8,9,10.
Abstract
Culex pipiens mosquitoes are vectors to many viruses and can transmit diseases such as filariasis and avian malaria. The present study evaluated the larvicidal activity of marine-derived endophytic fungi Aspergillus nomius and Aspergillus flavus from the soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi along with two known cyclodepsipeptide compounds, scopularide A (1) and B (2), isolated from A. flavus extract, against third-instar larvae of C. pipiens, using distilled water as a negative control and toosenedanin as a positive control. The structures of the isolated compounds were confirmed by various spectroscopic analyses. The lethal concentrations (LC50 and LC90) were calculated by probit analysis. Scopularide A was the most potent after 96 h treatment, with LC50 and LC90 values of 58.96 and 994.31 ppm, respectively, and with 82.66% mortality at a concentration of 300 ppm. To unravel the biochemical mechanism of the tested extracts and compounds, their effects against protease, chitinase, phenoloxidases and lipase enzymes from the whole-body tissue of C. pipiens were evaluated after 72 h treatment at LC50 dose. Superior activity was observed for A. flavus extract against all tested enzymes. A molecular docking study was conducted for scopularide A and B on the four tested enzymes, to further verify the observed activity. Results revealed good binding affinities for both compounds as compared to the docked ligands, mainly via a number of hydrogen bonds. This was the first study to report the isolation of endophytic fungi A. flavus and A. nomius from the marine soft coral S. ehrenbergi. The endophytic fungal extract of A. flavus was found to be a promising source for a natural larvicidal agent against C. pipiens populations.Entities:
Keywords: Culex pipiens; Sarcophyton ehrenbergi; chitinase; docking; endophytes; lipase; phenoloxidases; protease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35621982 PMCID: PMC9146806 DOI: 10.3390/md20050331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 6.085
1H-NMR, ATP, COSY, and HMBC spectral data of compound 1.
| Position | δC (ppm) | δH (ppm), Multiplicity, and | COSY | HMBC | Position | δC (ppm) | δH (ppm), Multiplicity, and | COSY | HMBC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenylalanine | Valine | ||||||||
|
| 172.66 | -- |
| 171.79 | -- | ||||
|
| 53.25 | 4.83 (m) | 3 | 1, 3, 4, Ala-1 |
| 57.93 | 4.21 (m) | 3 | 1, 3, 4, 5 |
|
| 38.55 | 3.12 (d, | 2 | 1, 2, 4, 5/9 |
| 31.11 | 2.18 (m) | 2, 4, 5 | 1, 2, 4, 5 |
|
| 135.76 | -- |
| 18.21 | 0.93 (d, | 3 | 2, 3, 5 | ||
|
| 129.10 | 7.16 (m) | 6/8 | 3, 5/9, 7 |
| 19.60 | 0.93 (d, | 3 | 2, 3, 4 |
|
| 128.52 | 7.28 (m) | 5/9 | 4, 6/8 |
| ||||
|
| 127.07 | 7.21 (m) | 6/8 | 5/9 |
| 171.17 | -- | ||
|
|
| 43.14 | 3.44 (dd, | 1, HMDA-1 | |||||
|
| 172.70 | -- |
| ||||||
|
| 49.53 | 4.24 (m) | 3 | 1, 3, Leu-1 |
| 172.81 | -- | ||
|
| 17.50 | 1.29 (d, | 2 | 2, 3 |
| 40.98 | 2.40 (m) | 3 | |
|
|
| 78.14 | 4.64 (m) | 2, 4 | |||||
|
| 173.28 | -- |
| 37.92 | 1.58 (m) | 3, 5, 11 | 3, 5, 6, 11 | ||
|
| 54.00 | 4.16 (m) | 3 |
| 32.12 | 0.91 (m) | 4, 6 | 3, 4, 7, 11 | |
|
| 39.15 | 1.58 (m) | 2,4 |
| 29.24 | 1.21 (m) | 5, 7 | 4, 8 | |
|
| 24.66 | 1.68 (m) | 3, 5, 6 |
| 29.06 | 1.21 (m) | 6, 8 | 5, 6, 8, 9 | |
|
| 22.43 | 0.95 (d, | 4 |
| 33.20 | 1.28 (m) | 7, 9 | 6, 7, 9, 10 | |
|
| 22.01 | 0.91 (d, | 4 |
| 22.69 | 1.22 (m) | 8, 10 | 7, 8, 10 | |
|
| 13.92 | 0.85 (t) | 9 | 8, 9 | |||||
|
| 13.52 | 0.78 (d, | 4 | 3, 4, 5 | |||||
1H-NMR, ATP, and COSY spectral data of compound 2.
| Position | δC (ppm) | δH (ppm), Multiplicity, and | HMBC | Position | δC (ppm) | δH (ppm), Multiplicity, and | HMBC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenylalanine | Valine | ||||||
|
| 172.29 | -- |
| 171.81 | -- | ||
|
| 53.49 | 4.72–4.64 (m) | 1, 3, 4, Ala-1 |
| 58.05 | 4.21 (t) | 1, 3, 4, 5 |
|
| 40.93 | 2.98 (dd, | 1, 2, 4, 5/9 |
| 28.25 | 2.27 (m) | 1, 2, 4, 5 |
|
| 135.74 | -- |
| 18.39 | 0.97 (d, | 2, 3, 5 | |
|
| 129.13 | 7.17 (m) | 3, 5/9, 7 |
| 19.65 | 0.97 (d, | 2, 3, 4 |
|
| 128.55 | 7.26 (m) | 4, 6/8 |
| |||
|
| 127.09 | 7.22 (m) | 5/9 |
| 1711.11 | -- | |
|
|
| 43.21 | 4.46 (d, | 1, HMOA-1 | |||
|
| 172.64 | -- |
| ||||
|
| 49.43 | 4.14 (q) | 1, 3, Leu-1 |
| 172.91 | -- | |
|
| 17.89 | 1.29 (d, | 2,3 |
| 41.2 | 2.41(m) | |
|
|
| 77.98 | 4.80 (m) | 2, 5, 9 | |||
|
| 172.94 | -- |
| 37.74 | 1.50 (m) | 3, 5, 6, 9 | |
|
| 53.23 | 4.27 (t) | 1, 3, 4, Val-1 |
| 32.48 | 1.19 (m) | 3, 4, 7, 9 |
|
| 39.06 | 1.60–1.57 (m) | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 |
| 29.34 | 1.10 (m) | 4, 7, 8 |
|
| 24.52 | 1.64 (m) | 2, 3, 5, 6 |
| 22.59 | 1.24 (m) | 5, 6, 8 |
|
| 22.02 | 0.97 (d, | 3, 4, 6 |
| 13.67 | 0.87 (t) | 6, 7 |
|
| 22.55 | 0.95 (d, | 3, 4, 5 |
| 14.05 | 0.75 (d, | 3, 4, 5 |
Figure 1Chemical structure of isolated cyclodepsipeptides.
Susceptibility of third-instar larvae C. pipiens to isolated compounds at different time intervals.
| Percentage Mortality (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentrations (ppm) | Scopularide A | Scopularide B | ||||||
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h | |
|
| 21.33 | 25.33 | 80 | 82.66 | 20 | 24 | 78.66 | 80 |
|
| 17.33 | 20 | 69.33 | 72 | 16 | 18.66 | 68 | 70.66 |
|
| 13.33 | 16 | 53.33 | 56 | 12 | 14.66 | 52 | 53.33 |
|
| 10.66 | 13.33 | 34.66 | 37.33 | 9.33 | 12 | 33.33 | 36 |
|
| 9.33 | 12 | 24 | 26.66 | 8 | 10.66 | 22.66 | 25.33 |
|
| 74,714.96 | 51,225.03 | 69.96 | 58.96 | 65,489.96 | 50,583.51 | 76.17 | 66.14 |
|
| 254,765,445.4 | 306,771,168.1 | 1167.2097 | 994.31 | 121,222,443.6 | 183,614,892.8 | 1256.21 | 1180.08 |
|
| 0.3628 ± 0.14 | 0.3393 ± 0.13 | 1.0485 ± 0.1203 | 1.0446 ± 0.1193 | 0.3922 ± 0.1493 | 0.36 ± 0.13 | 1.0529 ± 0.12 | 1.0241 ± 0.11 |
Susceptibility of third-instar larvae C. pipiens crude extracts of A. flavus and A. nomius at different time intervals.
| Percentage Mortality (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conc (ppm) | ||||||||
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h | |
|
| 18.66 | 22.66 | 76 | 78.66 | 17.33 | 20 | 73.33 | 74.66 |
|
| 14.66 | 17.33 | 66.66 | 69.33 | 13.33 | 14.66 | 64 | 65.33 |
|
| 10.66 | 13.33 | 49.33 | 49.33 | 9.33 | 12 | 46.66 | 48 |
|
| 8 | 10.66 | 32 | 34.66 | 6.66 | 8 | 29.33 | 30.66 |
|
| 6.66 | 9.33 | 20 | 24 | 5.33 | 6.66 | 17.33 | 18.66 |
|
| 52,659.3 | 46,847.74 | 87.2 | 74.3 | 40,102.7 | 32,051.5 | 102.8 | 94.8 |
|
| 49,875,033.8 | 98,192,084.9 | 1366.5 | 1328.8 | 19,084,973.0 | 20,417,679.0 | 1522.9 | 1449.9 |
|
| 0.4306 ± 0.15 | 0.3859 ± 0.14 | 0.1437 ± 0.12 | 1.0232 ± 0.12 | 0.4787 ± 0.16 | 0.457 ± 0.15 | 1.0947 ± 0.12 | 1.0818 ± 0.12 |
Figure 2Toxicity regression lines of crude extracts of A. flavus, A. nomius, and isolated compounds against third-instar larvae of C. pipiens after 72 h exposure.
Figure 3Toxicity regression lines of crude extracts of A. flavus, A. nomius, and isolated compounds against third-instar larvae of C. pipiens after 96 h exposure.
Effect of LC50 values of the tested samples on chitinase activity of C. pipiens larvae.
| Sample | (mg | % Change |
|---|---|---|
|
| 118 ± 8.6 a | 9.3 |
|
| 95 ± 3.2 b | −12.0 |
|
| 86 ± 2.5 b | −20.4 |
|
| 82 ± 2.4 b | −24.1 |
|
| 108 ± 5.1 a |
Means bearing different scripts are significantly different from control at p < 0.01 (Duncan’s multiple range test).
Effect of LC50 values of the tested samples on phenoloxidase activity of C. pipiens.
| Sample | (O.D. Units ×103/min/mg Protein) Mean ± SD | % Change |
|---|---|---|
|
| 1579 ± 14.5 c | −11.88 |
|
| 1772 ± 15.9 a | −1.11 |
|
| 1598 ± 13 bc | −10.82 |
|
| 1631 ± 9 b | −8.98 |
|
| 1792 ± 15.6 a |
Means bearing different scripts are significantly different from control at p < 0.01 (Duncan’s multiple range test).
Effect of LC50 values of the tested samples on lipase activity of C. pipiens larvae.
| Sample | (µM Oleic Acid Liberated/min/gram Body Weight) Mean ± SD | % Change |
|---|---|---|
|
| 4.6 ± 0.22 a | −52.7 |
|
| 2.9 ± 0.1 c | 0.3 |
|
| 3.8 ± 0.16 b | −26 |
|
| 3.9 ± 0.15 b | −28.3 |
|
| 3 ± 0.12 c |
Means bearing different scripts are significantly different from control at p < 0.01 (Duncan’s multiple range test).
Effect of LC50 values of the tested samples on protease activity of C. pipiens larvae.
| Sample | (ng D,L Alanine/min/mg Protein) | % Change |
|---|---|---|
|
| 3235 ± 106 ab | 5.6 |
|
| 2873 ± 61 c | 16.1 |
|
| 3116 ± 78 b | 9.0 |
|
| 2277 ± 42 d | 33.5 |
|
| 3426 ± 88 a |
Means bearing different scripts are significantly different from control at p < 0.01 (Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 4Two-dimensional interaction diagram between scopularide (A,B) and chitinase.
Figure 5Two-dimensional interaction diagram between scopularide (A,B) and protease.