| Literature DB >> 35621596 |
Lorenzo Bonetti1, Andrea Fiorati1,2, Agnese D'Agostino1,2, Carlo Maria Pelacani1, Roberto Chiesa1,2, Silvia Farè1,2, Luigi De Nardo1,2.
Abstract
Infection is a severe complication in chronic wounds, often leading to morbidity or mortality. Current treatments rely on dressings, which frequently contain silver as a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent, although improper dosing can result in severe side effects. This work proposes a novel methylcellulose (MC)-based hydrogel designed for the topical release of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) via an intelligent mechanism activated by the pH variations in infected wounds. A preliminary optimization of the physicochemical and rheological properties of MC hydrogels allowed defining the optimal processing conditions in terms of crosslinker (citric acid) concentration, crosslinking time, and temperature. MC/AgNPs nanocomposite hydrogels were obtained via an in situ synthesis process, exploiting MC both as a capping and reducing agent. AgNPs with a 12.2 ± 2.8 nm diameter were obtained. MC hydrogels showed a dependence of the swelling and degradation behavior on both pH and temperature and a noteworthy pH-triggered release of AgNPs (release ~10 times higher at pH 12 than pH 4). 1H-NMR analysis revealed the role of alkaline hydrolysis of the ester bonds (i.e., crosslinks) in governing the pH-responsive behavior. Overall, MC/AgNPs hydrogels represent an innovative platform for the pH-triggered release of AgNPs in an alkaline milieu.Entities:
Keywords: citric acid; crosslinking; methylcellulose; pH-responsive; silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35621596 PMCID: PMC9140787 DOI: 10.3390/gels8050298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gels ISSN: 2310-2861
Figure 1SR (%) vs. time of MC hydrogels in NSS at T = 37 °C. (A) pH = 4; (B) pH = 12. Gf (%) vs. time curves of MC hydrogels samples in NSS at T = 37 °C. (C) pH = 4; (D) pH = 12. * = p < 0.05 compared to MC control (* = MC vs. MC-L, * = MC vs. MC-M, * = MC vs. MC-H).
Figure 2SR (%) vs. time of MC hydrogels in NSS at T = 25 °C and (A) pH = 4 or (B) pH = 12; at T = 50 °C and (C) pH = 4 or (D) pH = 12. * = p < 0.05 compared to MC control (* = MC vs. MC-L, * = MC vs. MC-M, * = MC vs. MC-H).
Figure 3Representative G′ vs. γ curves for strain sweep tests on MC samples at (A) pH = 4 and (B) pH = 12. Representative G′ vs. T curves for temperature sweep tests on MC samples at (C) pH = 4 and (D) pH = 12.
Tt calculated from temperature sweep tests for each MC hydrogel formulation. * = p < 0.05 compared with MC control.
| MC | MC-L | MC-M | MC-H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH = 4 | 36.5 ± 0.7 | 32.8 ± 0.4 * | 34.0 ± 0.7 | - |
| pH = 7 | 36.8 ± 0.4 | 33.5 ± 0.7 | 35.0 ± 1.4 | - |
| pH = 12 | 33.5 ± 4.9 | 26.5 ± 0.7 | 30.5 ± 2.1 | 34.8 ± 2.5 |
Figure 41H-NMR spectrum of (A) washed MC-H sample swelled in D2O and then hydrolyzed and (B) non-washed MC-H specimens swelled at different pH (4 vs. 12). All the spectra were acquired at 30 °C. The yellow area highlights the -CH2- peaks of CA.
Figure 5(A) 1H-NMR spectrum of MC-H swelled at (A) pH = 4 and (B) at pH = 12, as function of temperature (30 vs. 50 °C).
Figure 6(A) TEM image of MC/AgNPs solution and (B) MC/AgNPs distribution analysis.
Figure 7UV–vis absorption spectra of (A) as-synthesized MC/AgNPs, (B) MC-H/AgNPs dry films, (C) swelling media at pH = 4 and 12. (D) Ag release (mgAg/gMC) from MC-H/AgNPs samples as a function of the pH obtained by ICP analyses. * = p < 0.05.